ESMO: New Agent, Aldoxorubicin (INNO-206), Shows Activity in Soft-Tissue Sarcoma


Results from a phase Ib/II trial presented at the ESMO 2012 Congress found that a tumor-targeting doxorubicin conjugate, aldoxorubicin (INNO-206), showed activity in relapsed soft-tissue sarcoma patients.

Results from a phase Ib/II trial presented at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) 2012 Congress found that a tumor-targeting doxorubicin conjugate, aldoxorubicin (formerly INNO-206), showed activity in relapsed soft-tissue sarcoma patients. According to the study, the agent works by attaching itself to an “acid-sensitive linker that binds covalently to cysteine-34 in circulating albumin.”

Intermediate magnification micrograph of a pleomorphic undifferentiated sarcoma, H&E stain; source: Nephron, Wikimedia Commons

The trial, ESMO abstract #1483PD, studied the safety and tumor response of aldoxorubicin in 19 patients, 13 of whom had metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma of various types whose disease had progressed following prior chemotherapy.

Aldoxorubicin was administered every 21 days intravenously at a 350 mg/m2 dose for up to eight cycles. Treatment was continued until toxicity became unacceptable or tumor progression was seen. Response to treatment was monitored every other month.

In the group of patients with soft-tissue sarcoma, five objective partial responses were seen, and seven patients had stable disease (median 6.43 months). One patient had tumor progression after the first evaluation.

“Although the trial data are derived from a small patient group, the fact that clinical benefit was seen in 77% of these patients is noteworthy, particularly given the advanced stage of disease,” said the trial’s principal investigator Sant P. Chawla, MD, FRACP, in a press release. “Further, of the eight evaluable patients who were previously treated with doxorubicin and had either not responded or relapsed, five showed clinical benefit with aldoxorubicin. Among these, three showed prolonged partial responses with greater than 30% tumor shrinkage.”

The trial achieved a cumulative doxorubicin dose equivalent to 2000 mg/m2, more than three times the peak cumulative dose of standard doxorubicin.

During the first cycle, the majority of the 19 patients had grade 3 or 4 neutropenias that were resolved with and without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor treatment prior to the next cycle. No participants experienced nonhematologic grade 3 or 4 events. Using MUGA and cardiac ultrasound, no relevant cardiotoxicity was observed. Two patients died during the first cycle (one from sepsis and one from disease progression); other serious adverse events included mucositis and febrile neutropenia.

The study investigators concluded that aldoxorubicin “is an active drug for the treatment of patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma who have failed prior chemotherapy.”

CytRx Corporation, the biopharmaceutical company that conducted the trial, plans to discuss a potential phase III pivotal trial for aldoxorubicin in the treatment of relapsed or refractory soft-tissue sarcoma with the US Food and Drug Administration.

Related Videos
The difference in adverse effect profiles between sorafenib and nirogacestat may make one treatment more appealing than the other for certain patients with desmoid tumors, says Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD.
The August CancerNetwork Snap Recap takes a look back at key FDA news updates, as well as expert perspectives on the chemotherapy shortage.
Future developments in the sarcoma space may also involve research on circulating tumor DNA and metabolic therapies, according to Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD.
Current research in the sarcoma space includes the development of treatment options such as T-cell therapies, and combinations such as TKIs/immunotherapy, according to Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD.
Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD, states that sitravatinib appears to be active and well tolerated among patients with dedifferentiated or well-differentiated liposarcoma.
Brian Van Tine, MD, PhD, also discusses how the treatment of desmoid tumors has evolved following data supporting the use of sorafenib in this population.
CAR T-cell therapies and immunotherapy agents may offer up new options and even become standard of care in certain sarcoma subtypes.
There are several novel treatments that may be beneficial in several sarcoma subtypes including CAR T-cell therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors, according to Sandra P. D’Angelo, MD.
Data from a ctDNA analysis of the phase 3 INTRIGUE study indicate that KIT mutational status may be associated with response to certain Tyrosine kinase inhibitors in GIST, according to an expert from the Yale Cancer Center in New Haven, Massachusetts.