Ethnicity and Pain Reviewed

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 11 No 1
Volume 11
Issue 1

ALBUQUERQUE-"Ethnicity is a relatively understudied concept in pain medicine," David B. Morris, PhD, writes in his review of ethnicity and pain (Pain Clinical Updates vol. IX, no. 4, November 2001). Existing research, he said, has provided "few firm generalizations" about the relationship between ethnicity and pain. This is due, in part, to the fact that both pain and ethnicity are "multidimensional, malleable, and shaped by culture."

ALBUQUERQUE—"Ethnicity is a relatively understudied concept in pain medicine," David B. Morris, PhD, writes in his review of ethnicity and pain (Pain Clinical Updates vol. IX, no. 4, November 2001). Existing research, he said, has provided "few firm generalizations" about the relationship between ethnicity and pain. This is due, in part, to the fact that both pain and ethnicity are "multidimensional, malleable, and shaped by culture."

Some studies suggest that minorities are less likely to receive adequate treatment for pain. Dr. Morris pointed to a US study that found no differences in the amount of opioid self-administered for acute pain among different ethnic groups, but significant differences in the amount of opioid prescribed.

Even when the prescription is adequate, he noted, "ethnic groups face inequalities that translate into poorly controlled pain." For example, pharmacies in poor, nonwhite neighborhoods may not stock adequate supplies of opioids.

Finally, Dr. Morris emphasized that although there may be measurable differences in how different ethnic groups experience pain, there are also "deep similarities." Studies of specific conditions, from cancer to childbirth, have found "major similarities among various ethnocultural groups in pain perception and response," he said.

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
“This is something where this is written by the trainees, for the trainees, and, of course, for all the other clinicians who take care of patients,” said Kiran Turaga, MD, MPH.
“Everyone—patients, doctors—we all want the same thing. We want [patients] to live longer,” said Kiran Turaga, MD, MPH, on patients with peritoneal surface malignancies.
Data from the phase 3 DeLLphi-304 trial at ASCO 2025 revealed a survival advantage with tarlatamab vs chemotherapy in second-line ES-SCLC.
The new peritoneal surface malignancy care guidelines had clinicians gather from every disease state to show increased representation.
The FDA approval of tarlatamab in SCLC has received much press attention, according to Daniel R. Carrizosa, MD, MS.
These new guidelines aim to alleviate some of the problems caused by patients with peritoneal metastases being diagnosed with the disease in late stages.
A combined cohort composed of patients from the TROPION-Lung01 and TROPION-Lung-05 trials showed a survival advantage with dato-DXd vs docetaxel.
The National ICE-T Conference may inspire future collaboration between community and academic oncologists in the management of different cancers.
4 experts in this video