Ethnicity and Pain Reviewed

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 11 No 1
Volume 11
Issue 1

ALBUQUERQUE-"Ethnicity is a relatively understudied concept in pain medicine," David B. Morris, PhD, writes in his review of ethnicity and pain (Pain Clinical Updates vol. IX, no. 4, November 2001). Existing research, he said, has provided "few firm generalizations" about the relationship between ethnicity and pain. This is due, in part, to the fact that both pain and ethnicity are "multidimensional, malleable, and shaped by culture."

ALBUQUERQUE—"Ethnicity is a relatively understudied concept in pain medicine," David B. Morris, PhD, writes in his review of ethnicity and pain (Pain Clinical Updates vol. IX, no. 4, November 2001). Existing research, he said, has provided "few firm generalizations" about the relationship between ethnicity and pain. This is due, in part, to the fact that both pain and ethnicity are "multidimensional, malleable, and shaped by culture."

Some studies suggest that minorities are less likely to receive adequate treatment for pain. Dr. Morris pointed to a US study that found no differences in the amount of opioid self-administered for acute pain among different ethnic groups, but significant differences in the amount of opioid prescribed.

Even when the prescription is adequate, he noted, "ethnic groups face inequalities that translate into poorly controlled pain." For example, pharmacies in poor, nonwhite neighborhoods may not stock adequate supplies of opioids.

Finally, Dr. Morris emphasized that although there may be measurable differences in how different ethnic groups experience pain, there are also "deep similarities." Studies of specific conditions, from cancer to childbirth, have found "major similarities among various ethnocultural groups in pain perception and response," he said.

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Specialties including neurosurgery, radiation oncology, and neuro-rehabilitation all play a notable role in the care of patients with brain tumors.
Treatment-related toxicities during neuro-oncology therapy appear well managed with dose modifications and treatment cycle holds.
The phase 3 NIVOSTOP trial evaluated an anti–PD-1 immunotherapy, nivolumab, in a patient population similar in the KEYNOTE-689 trial.
CAR T-cell therapies appear to be an evolving modality in the treatment of those with intracranial tumors, said Sylvia Kurz, MD, PhD.
Opportunities to further reduce relapses include pembrolizumab-based combination therapy and evaluating the agent’s contribution before and after surgery.
For patients with locally advanced head and neck cancers, the current standard of care for curative therapy has a cure rate of less than 50%.
Related Content