Frontline Ibrutinib/Venetoclax Provides High Rates of Undetectable MRD in CLL


First-line treatment with ibrutinib plus venetoclax provided high rates of undetectable minimal residual disease in peripheral blood and bone marrow of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Frontline ibrutinib (Imbruvica) plus venetoclax (Venclexta) provided high rates of undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD) in peripheral blood and bone marrow of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), according to findings from the MRD-cohort of the phase II CAPTIVATE trial presented at the 2019 ASH Annual Meeting.1

The all-oral, once-daily, chemotherapy-free regimen led to a 75% uMRD rate in peripheral blood and 72% in bone marrow.

“These excellent results validate synergism shown in preclinical studies,” lead study author Constantine S. Tam, MBBS, MD, hematologist and disease group lead, Low Grade Lymphoma and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, said in a presentation during the meeting. “The favorable [safety] profile of the combination with a low rate of discontinuation because of an adverse event (AE)-5% of patients had to stop because of an AE-and [the fact that] 90% of patients completed the intended treatment, really underscores this treatment as a viable option for [these patients].”

In the international, multicohort, phase II CAPTIVATE trial (NCT02910583), investigators enrolled 164 treatment-naïve patients with CLL who required treatment as per International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia criteria. Patients must have been <70 years old and had an ECOG performance status of 0 to 1.

Ibrutinib was initially administered alone in a lead-in stage at 420 mg daily for the first 3 cycles. After this stage, venetoclax was added and eventually escalated to a 400-mg daily dose. MRD was defined as <0.01% CLL cells by flow cytometry in the peripheral blood after 6 cycles of combination therapy and measured again by bone marrow after 12 cycles of ibrutinib plus venetoclax. Data presented at the 2019 ASH Annual Meeting were from the pre-randomization phase of the double-blind CAPTIVATE-MRD cohort.

Findings from the MRD-guided randomization phase of the trial are not yet available. In this phase, patients are randomized 1:1 to receive ibrutinib or placebo (undetectable MRD) or ibrutinib or ibrutinib/venetoclax (detectable MRD). Time-limited therapy with 12 cycles of ibrutinib combined with venetoclax are to be evaluated in a separate fixed-duration cohort (n = 159).

In the data presented at the 2019 ASH Annual Meeting, results showed that after 3 cycles of ibrutinib lead-in, hospitalization for tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) was avoided in 76% of at-risk patients. Among patients who had high baseline TLS risk, 90% became medium or low risk, and 74% were not hospitalized when initiating venetoclax. Additionally, no patients with medium or low TLS risk became high risk, Tam noted

Five patients discontinued ibrutinib prior to starting venetoclax; 4 were because of AEs and 1 was due to Richter’s transformation. Seven patients discontinued the combination treatment due to AEs (n = 4), as well as disease progression, patient withdrawal, and investigator decision (n = 1 each). Ninety percent of patients (n = 152) completed all 12 cycles of ibrutinib/venetoclax combination therapy, with a median treatment duration of 14.7 months (range, 0.5-19.9) and 12 months (range, 0.8-12.7) with ibrutinib and venetoclax. No patients have died.

uMRD was evaluated in peripheral blood (n = 163) and bone marrow (n = 155). Results also showed that in patients with undetectable MRD at cycle 16 in the peripheral blood with matched bone marrow samples, 93% had uMRD in both peripheral blood and bone marrow.

In the intent-to-treat population (n = 164), uMRD was achieved in 74% and 68% of patients in peripheral blood and bone marrow, respectively, with ≤12 cycles of combination treatment.

High rates of uMRD were sustained over time in MRD-evaluable patients, according to Tam. “It is important to note that high rates [of uMRD] were achieved irrespective of adverse clinical characteristics, including those with del17p, TP53 abnormalities, those who are unmutated in IGHV status, and those with complex karyotype,” Tam said.

Regarding safety, the most common AEs with single-agent ibrutinib were diarrhea, arthralgia, fatigue, headache, nausea, upper respiratory tract infection, vomiting, hypertension, and thrombocytopenia, with neutropenia accounting for the majority of grade 3/4 AEs.

The most common AEs associated with the combination were primarily grade 1/2. Grade 3/4 AEs were most frequent during the first 3 cycles of combination treatment (39%) and then decreased to 15% in the last 3 to 4 cycles. Fifty-seven percent of patients experienced grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs (TRAEs), and serious TRAEs occurred in 11% of patients.

With the combination, grade 3/4 neutropenia was an AE of interest. Grade 3/4 atrial fibrillation, major hemorrhage, febrile neutropenia, and laboratory TLS were infrequent; 2 cases of atrial fibrillation occurred in the ibrutinib lead-in phase, and 1 case was reported during combination treatment. No patients developed clinical TLS; laboratory TLS was reported in 3 patients as an AE, 1 of whom met Howard criteria.

“Diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and neutropenia are probably additional AEs caused by [the addition of] venetoclax to ibrutinib,” said Tam.

AEs that led to the discontinuation of either ibrutinib lead-in or ibrutinib/venetoclax combination therapy occurred in 8 patients (5%). Fourteen percent of AEs led to dose reductions of ibrutinib therapy compared with 9% of those that led to reductions of venetoclax. The rate of AEs that led to treatment discontinuation were 6% and 4% on ibrutinib and venetoclax, respectively.

Pharmacokinetics were also evaluated with the combination of ibrutinib and venetoclax. In his presentation, Tam noted that the venetoclax mean plasma area under the curve (AUC; n = 151) was higher when given with ibrutinib (58.6 μg·h/mL) versus the BCL-2 inhibitor alone (32.8 μg·h/mL); however, this was within the AUC range that was observed in prior study doses. The increase in venetoclax AUC also did not lead to any new safety findings. The mean AUC with ibrutinib (n = 112) did not change with concurrent venetoclax (646 ngh/mL) versus single-agent ibrutinib lead-in (641 ngh/mL).


1. Tam CS, Siddiqi T, Allan JN, et al. Ibrutinib (ibr) plus venetoclax (ven) for first-line treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL): results from the MRD cohort of the phase 2 CAPTIVATE study. Presented at: 2019 ASH Annual Meeting; December 7 to 10, 2019; Orlando, FL. Abstract 35.


This article originally appeared on OncLive, titled “Frontline Ibrutinib/Venetoclax Combo Leads to High Rates of Undetectable MRD in CLL.”

Related Videos
Rahul Gosain, MD; Nitin Jain, MD; and Rohit Gosain, MD, presenting slides
Rahul Gosain, MD; Nitin Jain, MD; and Rohit Gosain, MD, presenting slides
Rahul Gosain, MD; Nitin Jain, MD; and Rohit Gosain, MD, presenting slides
Rahul Gosain, MD; Nitin Jain, MD; and Rohit Gosain, MD, presenting slides
Some patients with large B-cell lymphoma may have to travel a great distance for an initial evaluation for CAR T-cell therapy.
Education is essential to referring oncologists manage toxicities associated with CAR T-cell therapy for patients with large B-cell lymphoma.
There is no absolute age cutoff where CAR T cells are contraindicated for those with large B-cell lymphoma, says David L. Porter, MD.
David L. Porter, MD, emphasizes referring patients with large B-cell lymphoma early for CAR T-cell therapy consultation.
It may be applicable to administer CAR T-cell therapy to patients with large B-cell lymphoma in a community or outpatient setting.
Related Content