Fulvestrant Plus Capivasertib Improved Survival Vs Fulvestrant/Placebo in ER+, HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer

Article

Findings from the phase 1/2 FAKTION trial indicated that survival had increased following the addition of capivasertib to fulvestrant for patients with aromatase inhibitor–resistant, estrogen receptor–positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.

The addition of capivasertib to fulvestrant (Faslodex) prolonged survival in patients with aromatase inhibitor–resistant, estrogen receptor–positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer compared with fulvestrant and placebo, according to results from the phase 1/2 FAKTION trial (NCT01992952) published in Lancet Oncology.

The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.3 months (95% CI, 5.0-13.4) in fulvestrant plus capivasertib arm vs 4.8 months (95% CI, 3.1-7.9) in the placebo arm (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39-0.84; 2-sided P = .0044). Moreover, median overall survival (OS) in the fulvestrant plus capivasertib arm was 29.3 months (95% CI, 23.7-39.0) vs 23.4 months (95% CI, 18.7-32.7) in the placebo arm (aHR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.45-0.97; 2-sided P = .035). In the intent-to-treat population (ITT), 71% of patients in the fulvestrant plus capivasertib group died vs 83% in the placebo group.

A total of 183 patients were screened for eligibility, of whom 140 enrolled and were randomly assigned to either the fulvestrant plus capivasertib arm (n = 69) or the placebo arm (n = 71). The median follow-up was 58.5 months in the fulvestrant plus capivasertib arm and 62.3 months in the placebo arm.

Moreover, 54% of patients had PIK3CA, AKT1, and PTEN alterations and 25% had alterations identified in tumors previously believed to be non-altered. Both groups were balanced for the proportion of patients with PIK3CA mutations vs AKT1 mutations vs PTEN alterations.

For those in the expanded altered pathway subgroup, the median follow-up was 54.3 months in the fulvestrant plus capivasertib group and 62.3 months in the placebo group. For those in the expanded pathway non-altered group, the median follow-up was 60.9 months in the fulvestrant plus capivasertib group and 70.3 months in the placebo group.

In the pathway-altered subgroup, the PFS was 12.8 (95% CI, 6.6-18.8) months in the fulvestrant plus capivasertib group vs 4.6 months (95% CI, 2.8-7.9) in the placebo group (aHR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.26-0.72; 2-sided P = .0014). In the expanded pathway non-altered group, the median PFS was 7.7 months (95% CI, 3.1-13.2) in the fulvestrant plus capivasertib group vs 4.9 months (95% CI, 3.2-10.5) in the placebo group (aHR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.40-1.25; P = .23).

Of those in the expanded pathway altered group, 64% in the fulvestrant plus capivasertib group had died vs 86% in the placebo group. In the non-altered group, 80% of patients in both groups, respectively, had died.

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) and digital droplet PCR results were obtained from 79% of patients in the placebo group, 81% of patients in the fulvestrant plus capivasertib group, and 80% in the ITT population. Of those who did not have an additional plasma or tissue sample available and did not undergo NGS, 19% were in the fulvestrant plus capivasertib arm and 21% were in the placebo arm. Of note, the NGS identified several PIK3CA mutations, AKT1, or PTEN loss of function alterations that were not reported in initial testing.

The most common grade 3/4 adverse effects (AEs) in the fulvestrant plus capivasertib and placebo groups, respectively, were hypertension (32% vs 25%), diarrhea (14% vs 4%), and rash (20% vs 0%). Serious AEs included pneumonia in the fulvestrant plus capivasertib arm. There was 1 death due to atypical pulmonary infection in the fulvestrant plus capivasertib group which may have been related to treatment. Another death in the same treatment arm occurred 1 year after treatment due to a thrombotic cerebrovascular accident. Deaths with an unknown cause included 4 in the fulvestrant plus capivasertib group and 3 in the placebo group, with the remaining 43 and 56 deaths, respectively, being disease related.

Reference

Howell SJ, Casbard A, Carucci M, et al. Fulvestrant plus capivasertib versus placebo after relapse or progression on an aromatase inhibitor in metastatic, oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer (FAKTION): overall survival, updated progression-free survival, and expanded biomarker analysis from a randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2022;23(7):851-864. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00284-4

Related Videos
Sara M. Tolaney, MD, MPH, an expert on breast cancer
Sara M. Tolaney, MD, MPH, an expert on breast cancer
The August CancerNetwork Snap Recap takes a look back at key FDA news updates, as well as expert perspectives on the chemotherapy shortage.
Ann H. Partridge, MD, MPH, talks about how fertility preservation can positively impact the psychosocial health in patients with breast cancer.
Daniel G. Stover, MD, describes how findings from the phase 3 NATALEE trial may support expanding the portion of patients who receive CDK 4/6 inhibitors as a treatment for hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.
Daniel G. Stover, MD, suggests that stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes may serve as a biomarker of immune activation and can potentially help optimize therapy with microtubule-targeting agents for patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Sara M. Tolaney, MD, MPH, discusses how, compared with antibody-drug conjugates, chemotherapy produces low response rates and disease control in the treatment of those with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.
Hope Rugo, MD, speaks to the importance of identifying patients with aromatase inhibitor–resistant, hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who are undergoing treatment with capivasertib/fulvestrant who may be at a high risk of developing diabetes or hyperglycemia.
Sara M. Tolaney, MD, MPH, describes the benefit of sacituzumab govitecan for patients with HER2-low metastatic breast cancer seen in the final overall survival analysis of the phase 3 TROPiCS-02 study.
An expert from Dana-Farber Cancer Institute describes which patients hormone receptor-positive,  HER2-negative breast cancer will benefit most from treatment with sacituzumab govitecan.
Related Content