High Intensity Interval Training Helped Men With Localized Prostate Cancer Achieve Increased Cardiorespiratory Fitness


High intensity interval training yielded decreased prostate-specific antigen levels and velocity, as well as lowering prostate cell growth in men with localized prostate cancer.

Men with localized prostate cancer who used high intensity interval training (HIIT) as a form of exercise were able to increase their cardiorespiratory fitness levels, as well as other benefits relating to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and velocity, according to results from the phase 2 ERASE trial (NCT03203460) that was published in JAMA Oncology.

Patients who adhered to the HIIT regimen had a peak oxygen consumption (VO2) increase by 0.9 mL/kg/min and usual care group experienced a decrease by 0.5 mL/kg/min (adjusted mean difference between groups, 1.6 mL/kg/min (95% CI, 0.3-2.9; P = .01). Patients in the HIIT group experienced decreased PSA levels (-1.1 μg/L; 95% CI, -2.1 to 0.0; P = .04), PSA velocity (-1.3 μg /L/y; 95% CI, -2.5 to -0.1; P = .04), and LNCaP cell growth (-0.13 optical density unit; 95% CI, -0.25 to -0.02; P = .02). Additionally, investigators did not identify statistically significant differences in PSA doubling time or testosterone. In addition to experiencing a significant increase in peak VO2 in liter per minute patients in the HIIT cohort experienced upper body strength and lower body flexibility.

“To our knowledge, the ERASE trial was the first randomized clinical trial to examine the efficacy of HIIT in men with localized prostate cancer undergoing active surveillance. As we hypothesized, a supervised 12-week HIIT program significantly improved cardiorespiratory fitness and indicators of prostate cancer biochemical progression,” the study’s investigators wrote.

The trial enrolled 52 eligible male patients, 26 of whom were randomized to the HIIT group and 26 to the usual care group. The average age was 63.4 years, and 89% (n = 46) of patient’s self-identified as White. In total, 88% (n = 46) of patients completed the postintervention peak VO2 assessment and 94% (n = 49) of patients completed the postintervention blood draw.

The mean baseline resistance exercise behavior was unbalanced between groups with the HIIT group utilizing an 18 (42) min/wk and the usual care group utilizing a 44 (62) min/wk, which was adjusted for analyses because of prognostic association with PSA and fitness outcomes.

This study was completed 2 weeks earlier than anticipated at 10-weeks for the last 6 participants—3 per each group—due to the impending closures of facilities during the COVID-19 outbreak.

Investigators reported a 100% adherence rate to intensity and duration, and patients attended 96% (n = 880) of planned exercise sessions. In total, 15% (n = 8) of patients reported aggravation of previous medical issues, including joint pain (n = 6), chest discomfort (n = 1), and light-headedness (n = 1); the medical issues were related to HIIT. Additionally, 1 patient reported stomach bleeding of a Dieulafoy lesion that was not related to HITT.

The PSA doubling time was better in the HIIT group, although it did not reach statistical significance (adjusted between-group mean difference, 17.9 months; 95% CI, -3.8 to 39.6; P = .10). Investigators did not identify an adjusted between-group mean difference in testosterone (1.0 nmol/L; 95% CI, -0.7 to 2.6; P = .24). The LNCap cell growth was significantly inhibited in the HIIT group vs the usual care group, with the adjusted between-group mean difference being -0.13 optical density unit (95% CI, -0.25 to -0.02; P = .02; or -5.1%).

“These improvements appear to be meaningful and may translate into better outcomes for patients with prostate cancer who are being managed by active surveillance,” the investigators concluded.


Kang DW, Fairey AS, Boulé NG, Field CJ, Wharton SA, Courneya KS. Effects of exercise on cardiorespiratory fitness and biochemical progression in men with localized prostate cancer under active surveillance: The ERASE randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. Published online, August 19, 2021. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.3067

Related Videos
Two women in genitourinary oncology discuss their experiences with figuring out when to begin a family and how to prioritize both work and children.
Over the past few decades, the prostate cancer space has evolved with increased funding for clinical trial creation and enrollment.
Rohit Gosain, MD; Rahul Gosain, MD; and Rana R. McKay, MD, presenting slides
Rohit Gosain, MD; Rahul Gosain, MD; and Rana R. McKay, MD, presenting slides
Rohit Gosain, MD; Rahul Gosain, MD; and Rana R. McKay, MD, presenting slides
Rohit Gosain, MD; Rahul Gosain, MD; and Rana R. McKay, MD, presenting slides
Anemia in patients who receive talazoparib plus enzalutamide for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer appears to be manageable without any compromises in patient-reported outcomes and quality of life.
Artificial intelligence models may be “seamlessly incorporated” into clinical workflow in the management of prostate cancer, says Eric Li, MD.
Robust genetic testing guidelines in the prostate cancer space must be supported by strong clinical research before they can be properly implemented, says William J. Catalona, MD.
Related Content