Long-Term Survival Benefit Reported for Pembrolizumab/Axitinib Combo in RCC

Article

As frontline therapy, pembrolizumab plus axitinib led to a statistically significant survival benefit over standard-of-care therapy, according to data presented at the 2021 ASCO Annual Meeting.

With 3.5 years of follow-up to the phase 3 KEYNOTE-426 trial (NCT02853331), frontline treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with the combination of pembrolizumab (Keytruda) plus axitinib (Inlyta) led to a survival benefit over sunitinib (Sutent), according to a presentation of the results at the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting.

At a median follow-up of 42.8 months, the median overall survival (OS) was 45.7 months (95% CI, 43.6–not reached) with pembrolizumab/axitinib compared with 40.1 months (95% CI, 34.3-44.2) with sunitinib (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.60-0.88; P <.001). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 15.7 months (95% CI, 13.6-20.2) versus 11.1 months (95% CI, 8.9-12.5), respectively (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.58-0.80; P <.0001).

“With a median follow-up of 42.8 months, KEYNOTE-426 represents the longest follow-up of a checkpoint inhibitor combined with a VEGF/VEGFR inhibitor for first-line clear cell RCC,” said lead study author Brian I. Rini, MD, a professor of medicine and the inaugural chief of Clinical Trials at Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center.

“Results of the final analysis of KEYNOTE-426 continue to support pembrolizumab plus axitinib as standard of care for patients with previously untreated advanced clear cell RCC,” added Rini.

The international, open-label study included 861 patients aged ≥18 years with treatment-naïve, advanced RCC. All patients had clear cell histology. Patients were randomized between October 24, 2016, and January 24, 2018, to either pembrolizumab plus axitinib (n = 432) or single-agent sunitinib (n = 429).

Baseline characteristics were well balanced across the study arms. “This was a typical frontline RCC population,” said Rini. In the combination arm, the median age was 62 years (range, 30-89), 71.3% of patients were male, and IMDC risk categories were favorable for 31.9%, intermediate for 55.1% and poor for 13%.

Previous nephrectomy had been received by 82.6% of the combination arm, and 72.9% of patients in this arm had ≥2 sites of metastases. Regarding PD-L1 status, 59.5% of 407 evaluated patients in the pembrolizumab/axitinib arm had a combined positive score ≥1.

In the combination arm, patients received pembrolizumab at 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks for up to 35 cycles plus axitinib at 5 mg orally twice daily. In the control arm, patients were treated with sunitinib at 50 mg orally once daily for the first 4 weeks of each 6-week cycle. Treatment was administered until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or if patients dropped out of the trial. OS and PFS were the primary study end points.

The follow-up range for the data reported at the ASCO meeting was a minimum of 35.6 months to a high of 50.6 months. At the time of follow-up, 14.5% of patients in the combination arm were still receiving treatment, compared with 9.4% of patients in the sunitinib arm.

In the combination arm, 58.4% of patients received subsequent anticancer therapy, compared with 73% in the sunitinib arm. In the pembrolizumab/axitinib arm, “About 20% received a PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor, nearly 90% received some form of VEGF inhibition, and one-third of patients received other therapies,” said Rini. These rates were 74.4%, 68.7%, and 22.8%, respectively, in the control arm.

Objective response rate at 42.8 months was 60.4% in the combination arm compared with 39.6% in the sunitinib arm. The complete response and partial response rates were 10% versus 3.5% and 50.5% versus 36.1%, respectively.

The median time to response was 2.8 months with the combination versus 3.0 months with sunitinib. The median duration of response was 23.6 months versus 15.3 months, respectively.

Regarding safety, Rini said, “The safety profile was comparable between arms and no new safety signals emerged.”

Updated safety data showed treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) across all grades occurred in 96.3% of the combination arm compared with 97.6% of patients in the sunitinib arm. “The only addition to this from previous presentations is proteinuria has now reached 20% overall incidence in the pembrolizumab plus axitinib arm,” said Rini.

The rates of grade 3 to 5 TRAEs were 67.8% versus 63.8%, respectively. There were 4 patient deaths in the pembrolizumab/axitinib arm compared with 7 in the sunitinib arm.

Based on prior data from the KEYNOTE-426 trial, the FDA approved pembrolizumab plus axitinib in April 2019 for use in the frontline setting for patients with advanced RCC.

Reference

Rini B, Plimack R, Stus V, et al. Pembrolizumab (pembro) plus axitinib (axi) versus sunitinib as first-line therapy for advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC): Results from 42-month follow-up of KEYNOTE-426. J Clin Oncol 39, 2021 (suppl 15; abstr 4500). doi: 10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.4500

Related Videos
Barbara Smith, MD, PhD, spoke about the potential use of pegulicianine-guided breast cancer surgery based on reports from the phase 3 INSITE trial.
Patient-reported symptoms following surgery appear to improve with the use of perioperative telemonitoring, says Kelly M. Mahuron, MD.
Treatment options in the refractory setting must improve for patients with resected colorectal cancer peritoneal metastasis, says Muhammad Talha Waheed, MD.
Although immature, overall survival data from the KEYNOTE-868 trial may support the use of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in patients with endometrial cancer.
Dostarlimab plus chemotherapy appears to yield favorable overall survival in patients with mismatch repair proficient endometrial cancer.
Some patients with large B-cell lymphoma may have to travel a great distance for an initial evaluation for CAR T-cell therapy.
Brian Slomovitz, MD, MS, FACOG discusses the use of new antibody drug conjugates for treating patients with various gynecologic cancers.
Education is essential to referring oncologists manage toxicities associated with CAR T-cell therapy for patients with large B-cell lymphoma.
There is no absolute age cutoff where CAR T cells are contraindicated for those with large B-cell lymphoma, says David L. Porter, MD.
David L. Porter, MD, emphasizes referring patients with large B-cell lymphoma early for CAR T-cell therapy consultation.
Related Content