Minimally Invasive Surgery and Laparotomy Yield Similar OS in Ovarian Cancer

Video

Minimally invasive surgery for interval debulking resulted in a lower mortality at the 30- and 90-day time points compared with laparotomy in advanced ovarian cancer.

Data indicate that there is no notable difference in survival when using minimally invasive surgery for interval debulking vs laparotomy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer, according to Kirsten Jorgensen, MD.

In an interview with CancerNetwork® during The Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) 2023 Annual Meeting on Women’s Cancer, Jorgensen, a fellow at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, also detailed that despite undergoing more extensive surgery, laparotomy did not provide an additional mortality benefit and that the minimally invasive group was discharged from the hospital faster with a shorter treatment interval.

Moreover, mortality was lower in the minimally invasive group vs the laparotomy group at the 30- and 90-day time points.

Transcript:

The major finding was that there was no worse overall survival for minimally invasive surgery when compared with laparotomy. This also included no worse overall survival at the 5-year estimated overall survival and the overall analysis.

Additionally, we did find that for the laparotomy group, there was more extensive surgery, but this didn’t come with any added mortality benefit. They [also] had higher rates of residual disease. Similar to prior studies, we also found that the minimally invasive group got out of the hospital faster and had shorter treatment time in the hospital.

We did find that there was lower mortality at the 30- and 90-day mark in the minimally invasive group. However, this was a rare outcome overall in both of our groups. Similarly, both groups had low rates of readmission. We were unable to measure complications from surgery directly due to the limitations of the dataset. We are hopeful that this is an avenue for future research, especially prospective research.

Reference

Jorgensen K, Wu FC, Nitecki R, et al. Laparotomy vs minimally invasive surgery for interval debulking surgery among patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Presented at: 2023 Annual Meeting on Women’s Cancer; March 25-28; Tampa, Florida.

Related Videos
Tailoring neoadjuvant therapy regimens for patients with mismatch repair deficient gastroesophageal cancer represents a future step in terms of research.
Not much is currently known about the factors that may predict pathologic responses to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in this population, says Adrienne Bruce Shannon, MD.
Data highlight that patients who are in Black and poor majority areas are less likely to receive liver ablation or colorectal liver metastasis in surgical cancer care.
Findings highlight how systemic issues may impact disparities in outcomes following surgery for patients with cancer, according to Muhammad Talha Waheed, MD.
Pegulicianine-guided breast cancer surgery may allow practices to de-escalate subsequent radiotherapy, says Barbara Smith, MD, PhD.
Adrienne Bruce Shannon, MD, discussed ways to improve treatment and surgical outcomes for patients with dMMR gastroesophageal cancer.
Barbara Smith, MD, PhD, spoke about the potential use of pegulicianine-guided breast cancer surgery based on reports from the phase 3 INSITE trial.
Patient-reported symptoms following surgery appear to improve with the use of perioperative telemonitoring, says Kelly M. Mahuron, MD.
Treatment options in the refractory setting must improve for patients with resected colorectal cancer peritoneal metastasis, says Muhammad Talha Waheed, MD.
Although immature, overall survival data from the KEYNOTE-868 trial may support the use of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in patients with endometrial cancer.
Related Content