MRI-Guided Focused Ultrasound Focal Therapy Safe, Efficacious in Grade Group 2 or Higher Prostate Cancer

Article

At 24 months of follow-up, MRI-guided focused ultrasound focal therapy was found to be safe and effective for patients with grade group 2 or 3 prostate cancer.

Patients with group 2 or 3 prostate cancer who were treated with MRI-guided focused ultrasound focal therapy experienced promising efficacy and a manageable safety profile, according to the 24-month biopsy outcomes from a phase 2b study (NCT01657942) published in The Lancet Oncology.

At 6 months, 95% of patients (n = 96/101; 95% CI, 89%-98%) showed no evidence of grade group 2 or higher disease following MRI-targeted and systemic biopsy in the treated prostate gland area. Moreover, 88% (n = 78/89; 95% CI, 79%-94%) of patients had no evidence of grade group 2 or higher disease at 24 months in the treated area. At the 6-month biopsy, it was reported that 19% of patients (n = 19/101; 95% CI, 12%-28%) had newly found grade group 2 disease.

A total of 194 patients were assessed for eligibility and 101 underwent treatment. The median age patient age was 63 years. In terms of previous treatments, 52% of patients had treatment in the apex, 80% in the mid-gland, 44% in the base, and 26% had treatment directed anteriorly in the transition zone.

Moreover, 78% of patients in the trial had grade group 2 disease, with a median concentration of prostate-specific antigen of 5.7 ng/mL. Following treatment, patients had a mean decrease in PSA of –3.0 ng/mL (95% CI, –3.6 to –2.4) at 6 months and –2.6 ng/mL (95% CI, –3.3 to –2.0) at 24 months.

The mean Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) score difference was worse 24 months vs baseline with a mean score difference of –3.5 (95% CI, –5.4 to –1.6). The same was noted for mean intercourse satisfaction (–1.8; 95% CI, –2.9 to –0.8), and overall satisfaction scores (–0.8; 95% CI, –1.3 to –0.3).

Of the patients who reported having functional erections at baseline (n = 58), 69% of patients responded at the 24-month follow-up, with 45% (95% CI, 29%-62%) reporting grade 0 erectile dysfunction, 18% (95% CI, 7%-33%) reporting grade 1 events, 28% (95% CI, 15%-44%) reporting grade 2 events, and 10% (95% CI, 3%-24%) reporting grade 3 events. Between baseline and 24 months, the mean IIEF score difference was –0.16 (95% CI, –3.2 to 2.8) among patients with a score of less than 24 at baseline.

Lower urinary tract symptoms were comparable from baseline (n = 99) to 24 months (n = 79) with a mean difference of 1.1 (95% CI, 0.33-1.8), along with International Prostate Symptom Score quality of life scores which had a mean difference of 0.07 (95% CI, –0.12 to 0.27).

Overall, 18% of patients had grade 2 or lower incontinence. No patients reported having stress urinary incontinence necessitating a pad across the study period. The ICIQ-UI-SF score determined the probability of excellent urinary continence—defined as a score of less than 10—was 100% at 24 months after treatment for those who reported continence at baseline. At 24 months, overall Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate scores were similar compared with baseline, with a mean change of –2.6 (95% CI, –5.6 to 0.4).

Investigators observed 1 grade 3 treatment-related adverse effect (AE) of urinary tract infection related to the device or procedure but was resolved within 3 days. Grade 2 or lower common AEs were hematuria (24%) and urinary retention (15%). After treatment, urinary retention was found and resolved within 7 days. A urethral stricture was observed at 90 days and resolved after a single dilation.

Reference

Ehdaie B, Tempany CM, Holland F, et al. MRI-guided focused ultrasound focal therapy for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer: a phase 2b, multicentre study. Lancet Oncol. 2022;23(7):910-918. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00251-0

Related Videos
Two women in genitourinary oncology discuss their experiences with figuring out when to begin a family and how to prioritize both work and children.
Over the past few decades, the prostate cancer space has evolved with increased funding for clinical trial creation and enrollment.
Rohit Gosain, MD; Rahul Gosain, MD; and Rana R. McKay, MD, presenting slides
Rohit Gosain, MD; Rahul Gosain, MD; and Rana R. McKay, MD, presenting slides
Rohit Gosain, MD; Rahul Gosain, MD; and Rana R. McKay, MD, presenting slides
Rohit Gosain, MD; Rahul Gosain, MD; and Rana R. McKay, MD, presenting slides
Anemia in patients who receive talazoparib plus enzalutamide for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer appears to be manageable without any compromises in patient-reported outcomes and quality of life.
Artificial intelligence models may be “seamlessly incorporated” into clinical workflow in the management of prostate cancer, says Eric Li, MD.
Robust genetic testing guidelines in the prostate cancer space must be supported by strong clinical research before they can be properly implemented, says William J. Catalona, MD.
Related Content