Novel PSMA-TRT-based Triplet Regimen Appears Effective in Prostate Cancer


All patients with chemo-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer experienced PSA decline, and half the cohort experienced a PSA decline greater than 50% after treatment with a novel PSMA-targeted radionuclide therapy.

The use of an alpha prostate-specific membrane antigen-targeted radionuclide therapy (PSMA-TRT, 225Ac-J591), an androgen receptor (AR) signaling inhibitor, and pembrolizumab (Keytruda) elicited preliminary responses in patients with chemo-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), investigators reported.1

Novel Therapy Elicits PSA Decline in a Group of Patients Chemo-naïve Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Experienced PSA Decline

All patients with chemo-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer experienced PSA decline, and half the cohort experienced a PSA decline greater than 50% after treatment with a novel PSMA-targeted radionuclide therapy.

The preliminary findings of a phase 1/2 study were presented at the Society of Urologic Oncology Annual Meeting in San Diego by Michael Sun, MD, a hematology-oncology fellow at Weill Cornell Medicine in New York City.

“Immunotherapy generally results in modest responses for prostate cancer. Radiation, though, may increase the proportion of patients that respond to immunotherapy,” Sun explained.

In addition, PSMA-TRT is able to radiate multiple sites of disease simultaneously, and AR signaling inhibitors upregulate PSMA expression, may lead to increased PD-L1 expression, and can also radiosensitize prostate cancer.

“We hypothesize that triple therapy with [PSMA-TRT], pembrolizumab, and an [AR signaling inhibitor] will have a synergistic effect and lead to better responses and outcomes relative to immunotherapy plus [AR signaling inhibitor] alone,” Sun said.

The study enrolled patients with progressive mCRPC as defined by Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 criteria (at least 1 AR pathway inhibitor and no chemotherapy in the mCRPC setting). During the phase 1 portion of the study, patient received physician’s choice of AR signaling inhibitor along with pembrolizumab (400 mg every 6 weeks) along with a single infusion of 225Ac-J591 in 2 different cohorts of 6 patients (65 KBq/kg or 80 KBq/kg).

The phase 1 portion’s primary end point was the determination of 225Ac-J591 dose for the phase 2 portion of the study.

Median patient age was 66.5 years, and median prostate-specific antigen level was 7.75 ng/mL. Six patients (50%) had Cancer and Leukemia Group B intermediate-risk disease, 4 (33%) had low-risk disease, and 11 patients (92%) had bone metastases. All patients had received at least 1 prior AR pathway inhibitor. Five patients (42%) had received prior sipuleucel-T (Provenge), 1 (8%) had received prior radium-223 (Xofigo), 6 (50%) had received prior enzalutamide (Xtandi), 7 had received prior abiraterone acetate (Zytiga), and 2 (17%) had received prior PSMA-TRT.

AR signaling inhibitors used in the study included enzalutamide in 7 patients (58%), apalutamide (Erleada) in 3 patients (25%) and darolutamide (Nubeqa) in 2 patients (17%).

All of the patients experienced PSA decline, and half the cohort experienced a PSA decline greater than 50%. At more than 6 months’ follow-up, 4 patients (all from the 80 KBq/kg cohort) are still progression free and on study.

Regarding adverse events (AEs), “7 patients (58%) developed an unexpected inflammatory syndrome 7-14 days following treatment (C1D1) characterized by morbilliform rash, fever higher than 101°F, and low blood counts,” wrote the authors in their poster.

All-grade AEs included thrombocytopenia in 9 patients (75%), neutropenia in 7 patients (58%), nausea in 6 patients (50%), fatigue in 8 patients (67%), xerostomia in 9 patients (75%), and AST increase in 8 patients (67%).

Based on the findings of the phase 1 portion, the investigators selected the 80 KBq/kg dose of 225Ac-J591 for the phase 2 portion of the study, Sun reported at the meeting. That phase of the study is currently under way.

“Phase 2 is multicenter. Patients are randomized to triplet vs doublet [therapy],” Sun said. “The stratification criteria is based on presence or absence of visceral metastases, PSMA-PET imaging intensity, and [circulating blood cell (CBC)] count at baseline.

“The primary end point is response…which is a composite of radiographic response by RECIST criteria, conversion of unfavorable CBC counts to favorable, or PSA 50.”


1. Sun M, Nauseef J, Huicochea Castellanos S, et al. Phase I results of a phase I/II trial of pembrolizumab and AR signaling inhibitor (ARSI) +/- 225Ac-J591 for chemo-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Presented at: Society for Urologic Oncology (SUO) 23rd Annual Meeting; November 30-December 2, 2022; San Diego, California. Poster 76.

Related Videos
Considering cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer may help with managing the shortage of Bacillus Calmette-Guerin, according to Joshua J. Meeks, MD, PhD, BS.
Anemia in patients who receive talazoparib plus enzalutamide for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer appears to be manageable without any compromises in patient-reported outcomes and quality of life.
Patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer and visceral disease may particularly benefit from enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab, according to Amanda Nizam, MD.
High-grade adverse effects with zanidatamab plus palbociclib and fulvestrant seem to be uncommon in patients with HER2-positive, hormone receptor–positive, metastatic breast cancer, according to Sara Hurvitz, MD, FACP.
Black male patients with breast cancer appear to experience worse survival outcomes compared with White patients when controlling for clinicopathological variables, according to Jason (Jincong) Q. Freeman, MPH, MS.
Results from the ECOG-ACRIN E4112 trial appear to support the use of DCIS scores for identifying patients with breast cancer who may be eligible to omit radiotherapy following MRI-guided surgery.
Providers should inform patients with breast cancer that selecting later-line therapies following prior treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors is a “developing area,” says Abigail M. Johnston, JD.
Data from the phase 3 NATALEE trial highlight a positive toxicity profile for ribociclib as an adjuvant therapy for patients with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, says Neil M. Iyengar, MD.
Future research will focus on ctDNA dynamics change over time in the full translational cohort of patients with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer in the phase 3 monarchE study, says Stephanie L. Graff, MD.
Findings from a National Cancer Database analysis highlight no statistically significant differences in survival outcomes with chemotherapy for patients over 81 years old with triple-negative breast cancer compared with those who do not receive chemotherapy.
Related Content