Percutaneous RFA an Option for Some Lung Met Patients

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 15 No 8
Volume 15
Issue 8

Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of lung metastases of colorectal cancer may be a useful treatment option in patients who are not candidates for surgery, but the benefit varies with the size of the metastases

ASCO — Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of lung metastases of colorectal cancer may be a useful treatment option in patients who are not candidates for surgery, but the benefit varies with the size of the metastases, Tristan D. Yan, MBBS, reported at the 2006 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting (abstract 3502). Dr. Yan and his colleagues at St. George Hospital, Sydney, Australia, conducted a prospective, nonrandomized phase II study of percutaneous RFA among 55 adults with pulmonary metastases of colorectal cancer who were not candidates for surgery or who refused surgery. Patients must have undergone complete resection of their colorectal cancer and any liver metastases.

RFA was not associated with any deaths, Dr. Yan said, but 42% of patients had at least one complication. With a median follow-up of 24 months, he said, 66% of patients experienced a progression of their cancer at any systemic site. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 15 months. In multivariate analysis, only a lung lesion measuring greater than 3 cm was independently associated with an increased risk of progression (HR 5.1).

Overall, 38% of patients had a local progression. The median local PFS had not been reached at the time of analysis. In multivariate analysis, the two factors independently associated with a higher risk of local progression were a lung lesion measuring greater than 3 cm (HR 8.3) and a CEA level of more than

5 ng/mL at 1 month after RFA (HR 3.5). Median overall survival was 33 months, with 1-, 2-, and 3-year rates of 85%, 64%, and 46%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, only a lung lesion greater than 3 cm was independently associated with increased risk of death (HR 4.5).

"The 55 patients may not be a true representation of the target population," Dr. Yan said. "We see more patients presenting with colorectal liver metastases before their lung metastases in our hospital. A lot of these patients were judged to be nonsurgical candidates because they had two-organ metastases." Another limitation was the difficulty of assessing the response to RFA. "During the early period after RFA, there is a large area of consolidation that gradually resolves over time. Especially during the first 3 months, it is difficult to assess whether the tumor has progressed," he said.

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Treatment with KRAS inhibitors may help mitigate a common driver of genetic alteration across a majority of pancreatic cancers.
Updated results from the BREAKWATER study seemed to be most impactful to the CRC space, according to Michael J. Pishvaian, MD, PhD.
Future research will aim to assess the efficacy of PIPAC-MMC plus systemic therapy vs systemic therapy alone in patients with peritoneal tumors.
Although small incision surgery may serve as a conduit to deliver PIPAC-MMC, it may confer benefits in the staging and treatment of peritoneal tumors.
Patients with peritoneal metastases were historically associated with limited survival and low consideration for clinical trials.
Combining sotorasib with panitumumab may reduce the burden of disease in patients with KRAS G12C-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer.
Findings from the CodeBreak 300 study have cemented sotorasib/panitumumab as a third-line treatment option for KRAS G12C-mutated colorectal cancer.
Sotorasib plus panitumumab may offer improved survival compared with previously approved treatment options in KRAS G12C-mutated colorectal cancer.
Additional local, regional, or national policy may bolster access to screening for colorectal cancer, according to Aasma Shaukat, MD, MPH.
Related Content