QOL Analysis Confers Nivolumab Tolerability Versus Placebo for Esophageal, Gastroesophageal Cancer

Article

Similar results with nivolumab and a matched placebo are reported with preliminary health-related quality-of-life data from the CheckMate 577 trial.

Preliminary findings from the phase 3 CheckMate 577 trial (NCT02743494) presented at the 2021 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium show trends toward improved esophageal-specific and health-related quality of life with nivolumab (Opdivo) in patients with esophageal/gastroesophageal cancer, closely correlating with results observed in a placebo group.

“It was previously reported that nivolumab is the first adjuvant therapy to provide a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in disease-free survival versus a placebo in resected esophageal cancer/gastroesophageal junction cancer following neoadjuvant therapy,” said Eric Van Cutsem, MD, PhD, professor of internal medicine at the University of Leuven in Belgium and head of digestive oncology at the University Hospital Gasthuisberg in Leuven, during the virtual presentation.

The primary end point of this study was disease-free survival (DFS), with secondary end points of overall survival (OS) and OS rates at 1, 2, and 3 years. Investigators enrolled 794 patients, of whom 532 were randomly assigned nivolumab and 262 randomly assigned placebo.

To assess health-related quality of life, general- and disease-related symptoms, and functioning disease burden, investigators used the FACT-E and EQ-5D-3L patient-reported outcome questionnaires. The questionaries were administered at baseline, every 4 weeks during the 12-month treatment, and at post-treatment follow-up visits. Completion rates for patient reports at baseline were 95%, and approximately 90% at 12 months.

At baseline, mean health-related quality of life scores were similar in both groups, and both groups saw an increase in these scores after 1 year.

Scores were similar in the nivolumab and placebo groups for the following: FACT-E total score (133.4 vs. 134.03, respectively), EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (70.4 vs. 69.1, respectively) and EQ-5D Utility Index (0.82 vs. 0.831, respectively). The investigators also observed similarities in scores for the esophageal cancer subscale (50.2 vs. 50.1).

Increases in these scores occurred from baseline through most time points through 49 weeks in both groups.

“Patients treated with [nivolumab] did not experience a reduction in [health-related] QoL, further supporting clinical data to demonstrate benefit and tolerability for adjuvant [nivolumab] in patients with resected [esophageal cancer/ gastroesophageal junction cancer],” the investigators concluded in their abstract.

Reference:

Van Cutsem E, Singh P, Cleary JM, et al. Checkmate 577: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in a randomized, double-blind phase III study of nivolumab (NIVO) versus placebo (PBO) as adjuvant treatment in patients (pts) with resected esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer (EC/GEJC). Presented at: 2021 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium; January 15-17, 2021; virtual. Abstract 167.

Recent Videos
Paolo Tarantino, MD discusses updated breast cancer trial findings presented at ESMO 2024 supporting the use of agents such as T-DXd and ribociclib.
Higher, durable rates of response to frontline therapy are needed to potentially improve long-term survival among patients with non–small cell lung cancer.
Although no responses were observed in 11 patients receiving abemaciclib monotherapy, combination therapies with abemaciclib may offer clinical benefit.
Findings show no difference in overall survival between various treatments for metastatic RCC previously managed with immunotherapy and TKIs.
An epigenomic profiling approach may help pick up the entire tumor burden, thereby assisting with detecting sarcomatoid features in those with RCC.
Future meetings may address how immunotherapy, bispecific agents, and CAR T-cell therapies can further impact the AML treatment paradigm.
Treatment with revumenib appeared to demonstrate efficacy among patients with KMT2A-rearranged acute leukemia in the phase 2 AUGMENT-101 study.
Advocacy groups such as Cancer Support Community and the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society may help support patients with CML undergoing treatment.
Paolo Tarantino, MD, discusses the potential utility of agents such as datopotamab deruxtecan and enfortumab vedotin in patients with breast cancer.
Related Content