Questionnaires Are Comparable in Assessing Lymphedema in Endometrial Cancer

Article

The lower extremity lymphedema screening questionnaire and gynecological cancer lymphedema questionnaire appear to demonstrate comparable utility in assessing lymphedema in patients with advanced endometrial cancer.

Use of the gynecological cancer lymphedema questionnaire (GCLQ) and the lower extremity lymphedema screening questionnaire (LELSQ) yielded concordant results in the assessment of lymphedema in patients with advanced endometrial cancer, according to findings from a retrospective analysis presented at The Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) 2023 Annual Meeting on Women’s Cancer.

“In this retrospective, cross-sectional study, the GCLQ and LELSQ demonstrated strong correlation between total scores," according to the study authors.

“In this retrospective, cross-sectional study, the GCLQ and LELSQ demonstrated strong correlation between total scores," according to the study authors.

Among 1848 women with endometrial cancer, 61% responded to the survey. Among these, 946 were able to respond to both the GCLQ and LESQ. There were 5 cutoff points for the LELSQ and 4 cutoff points for the GCLQ. At the time of analysis, 414 (44%) and 471 (50%) patients tested positive for lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) with the LELS and GCLQ assessments, respectively.

Moreover, Spearman’s correlation coefficient between the GCLQ and the LELSQ scores was 0.83 (P < .001). According to the study authors, this indicates a very strong relationship.

Cohen’s Kappa analysis also showed substantial agreement between these cutoffs (0.63) as well as moderate to substantial agreement for all evaluated cutoffs (range, 0.53-0.66).

“In this retrospective, cross-sectional study, the GCLQ and LELSQ demonstrated strong correlation between total scores,” study authors wrote in the poster. “However, subgroup analysis showed variations in agreement.”

Study authors noted in the poster that LEL is a common complication for many patients who undergo treatment for gynecological cancers. Despite this, no gold standard for diagnosing LEL exists, and several different questionnaires set to identify LEL through self-reporting have subsequently been integrated into clinical practice. The goal of this study, therefore, was to compare the dichotomous 20-item GCLQ against the grade 13-item LELSQ in endometrial cancer survivors. Patients were also queried about their comorbidities.

The study looked at women who had undergone primary surgery for assumed early-stage endometrial cancer between January 2006, and December of 2021. These women were invited to complete a questionnaire which included the GCLQ, the LELSQ, along with questions on their demographics. Patients were able to respond electronically or by mail. The common cutoff for self-reported LEL was 4 with the GCLQ and 5 for the LELSQ. Other cutoffs were assessed during the original validation process of these questionaries, and for subgroups. Agreement between the 2 questionnaires were evaluated through Cohen’s kappa while correlations between the toral scores were assessed via Spearman’s correlation coefficient. Investigators also evaluated the patient’s comorbidities data.

The median age of the responders was 71.3 years, and the mean self-reported body mass index was 28.0 kg/m2. The median time between surgery and survey was 6 years, with most patients (62%) having received surgery over 5 years prior to analysis.

Eighty-four percent of the patients had stage I disease; 5% has stage II, 3% had stage IIIA/B, 8% had stage IIIC, and1% had stage IV. Moreover, 75% of patients had endometrioid histology. Thirty-six percent had no nodal assessment, 22% had sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy and 42% had lymphadenectomy. In terms of prior treatment, 64% had not received adjuvant therapy, 36% had received adjuvant chemotherapy, and less than 1% had received adjuvant radiotherapy. Most patients had musculoskeletal complaints (59%).

In exploring the various reference cutoffs across subgroups investigators observed a shift from substantial to moderate agreement, according to Cohen’s Kappa, in the following domains: a body mass index greater than 30, less than 5 years since surgery, SLN as nodal assessment, receiving adjuvant therapy, and musculoskeletal complaints.

Reference

Trent PB, Falk RS, Staff AC, Thorsen L, Engeskaug I, Opheim L, Eriksson AGZ. Head-to-head comparison of the gynecological cancer questionnaire and the lower extremity lymphedema screening questionnaire in a cohort of endometrial carcinoma survivors. Presented at: Society for Gynecologic Oncology Annual Meeting on Women’s Cancer; March 25-28; Tampa, Florida.

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Success with the 177Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy would be transformative for the clear cell renal cell carcinoma treatment landscape.
An ongoing phase 1 trial seeks to prove XmAb819 as an effective treatment and ENPP3 as a plausible target in patients with relapsed or refractory RCC.
“The therapy is designed to prevent both CAR T-cell inactivation and to restore the anti-tumor immunity of the white blood cells that have gotten through the tumor,” said Marasco, MD, PhD.
Ongoing studies aim to combine base immunotherapy regimens with novel agents to potentially improve outcomes among patients with kidney cancer.
Investigators have found a way to reduce liver and biliary toxicity when targeting the molecule CAIX in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Neoantigen-targeting vaccines resulted in an absence of recurrence in 9 patients with high-risk kidney cancer, according to David A. Braun, MD, PhD.
The Kidney Cancer Research Consortium may allow collaborators to form more mechanistic and scientifically driven efforts in the field.
Wayne A. Marasco, MD, PhD, stated that by targeting 2 molecules instead of 1, higher levels of tumor cell killing can be achieved in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Leading experts in the breast cancer field highlight the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, and other treatment modalities.
Related Content