Questionnaires Are Comparable in Assessing Lymphedema in Endometrial Cancer

Article

The lower extremity lymphedema screening questionnaire and gynecological cancer lymphedema questionnaire appear to demonstrate comparable utility in assessing lymphedema in patients with advanced endometrial cancer.

Use of the gynecological cancer lymphedema questionnaire (GCLQ) and the lower extremity lymphedema screening questionnaire (LELSQ) yielded concordant results in the assessment of lymphedema in patients with advanced endometrial cancer, according to findings from a retrospective analysis presented at The Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) 2023 Annual Meeting on Women’s Cancer.

“In this retrospective, cross-sectional study, the GCLQ and LELSQ demonstrated strong correlation between total scores," according to the study authors.

“In this retrospective, cross-sectional study, the GCLQ and LELSQ demonstrated strong correlation between total scores," according to the study authors.

Among 1848 women with endometrial cancer, 61% responded to the survey. Among these, 946 were able to respond to both the GCLQ and LESQ. There were 5 cutoff points for the LELSQ and 4 cutoff points for the GCLQ. At the time of analysis, 414 (44%) and 471 (50%) patients tested positive for lower extremity lymphedema (LEL) with the LELS and GCLQ assessments, respectively.

Moreover, Spearman’s correlation coefficient between the GCLQ and the LELSQ scores was 0.83 (P < .001). According to the study authors, this indicates a very strong relationship.

Cohen’s Kappa analysis also showed substantial agreement between these cutoffs (0.63) as well as moderate to substantial agreement for all evaluated cutoffs (range, 0.53-0.66).

“In this retrospective, cross-sectional study, the GCLQ and LELSQ demonstrated strong correlation between total scores,” study authors wrote in the poster. “However, subgroup analysis showed variations in agreement.”

Study authors noted in the poster that LEL is a common complication for many patients who undergo treatment for gynecological cancers. Despite this, no gold standard for diagnosing LEL exists, and several different questionnaires set to identify LEL through self-reporting have subsequently been integrated into clinical practice. The goal of this study, therefore, was to compare the dichotomous 20-item GCLQ against the grade 13-item LELSQ in endometrial cancer survivors. Patients were also queried about their comorbidities.

The study looked at women who had undergone primary surgery for assumed early-stage endometrial cancer between January 2006, and December of 2021. These women were invited to complete a questionnaire which included the GCLQ, the LELSQ, along with questions on their demographics. Patients were able to respond electronically or by mail. The common cutoff for self-reported LEL was 4 with the GCLQ and 5 for the LELSQ. Other cutoffs were assessed during the original validation process of these questionaries, and for subgroups. Agreement between the 2 questionnaires were evaluated through Cohen’s kappa while correlations between the toral scores were assessed via Spearman’s correlation coefficient. Investigators also evaluated the patient’s comorbidities data.

The median age of the responders was 71.3 years, and the mean self-reported body mass index was 28.0 kg/m2. The median time between surgery and survey was 6 years, with most patients (62%) having received surgery over 5 years prior to analysis.

Eighty-four percent of the patients had stage I disease; 5% has stage II, 3% had stage IIIA/B, 8% had stage IIIC, and1% had stage IV. Moreover, 75% of patients had endometrioid histology. Thirty-six percent had no nodal assessment, 22% had sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy and 42% had lymphadenectomy. In terms of prior treatment, 64% had not received adjuvant therapy, 36% had received adjuvant chemotherapy, and less than 1% had received adjuvant radiotherapy. Most patients had musculoskeletal complaints (59%).

In exploring the various reference cutoffs across subgroups investigators observed a shift from substantial to moderate agreement, according to Cohen’s Kappa, in the following domains: a body mass index greater than 30, less than 5 years since surgery, SLN as nodal assessment, receiving adjuvant therapy, and musculoskeletal complaints.

Reference

Trent PB, Falk RS, Staff AC, Thorsen L, Engeskaug I, Opheim L, Eriksson AGZ. Head-to-head comparison of the gynecological cancer questionnaire and the lower extremity lymphedema screening questionnaire in a cohort of endometrial carcinoma survivors. Presented at: Society for Gynecologic Oncology Annual Meeting on Women’s Cancer; March 25-28; Tampa, Florida.

Recent Videos
The addition of radiotherapy to CAR T-cell therapy may particularly benefit patients with localized disease, according to Timothy Robinson, MD, PhD.
Timothy Robinson, MD, PhD, discusses how radiation may play a role as bridging therapy to CAR T-cell therapy for patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL.
James Ninia, MD, discussed treatment options for patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer undergoing metastasis-directed radiotherapy.
Paolo Tarantino, MD discusses updated breast cancer trial findings presented at ESMO 2024 supporting the use of agents such as T-DXd and ribociclib.
Higher, durable rates of response to frontline therapy are needed to potentially improve long-term survival among patients with non–small cell lung cancer.
Ritu Salani, MD, discussed investigational endometrial cancer treatment options for patients with varying subtypes of endometrial cancer.
The second interim analysis of the phase 3 RUBY trial found the safety profile was consistent with the first interim analysis and no new deaths due to AEs were observed.
The phase 3 RUBY trial evaluated dostarlimab in combination with carboplatin/paclitaxel in patients with primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer.
Although no responses were observed in 11 patients receiving abemaciclib monotherapy, combination therapies with abemaciclib may offer clinical benefit.
Related Content