Radiotherapy Versis Chemotherapy as ConsolidativeTreatment for Stage IIIB-IV Hodgkin’s Disease in First Complete Remission or Good Partial Response: A Study of 559 Patients (H89 Protocol)

OncologyONCOLOGY Vol 13 No 3
Volume 13
Issue 3

The role of radiotherapy in combination with chemotherapy in advanced-stage Hodgkin’s disease remains controversial.


The role of radiotherapy in combination with chemotherapy in advanced-stage Hodgkin’s disease remains controversial. Between July 1989 and December 1996, 559 patients less than 66 years of age with stage IIIB-IV previously untreated Hodgkin’s disease were randomized, at diagnosis, to receive six cycles of ABVPP (Adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, procarbazine, and prednisone; group A) or a MOPP/ABV (mechlorethamine, Oncovin, procarbazine, and prednisone/Adriamycin, bleomycin, and vinblastine) hybrid (group B).

Patients in complete remission (CR) or partial remission (PR) ³ 75% after six cycles were then randomized to receive either two additional cycles of the same regimen or radiation therapy: (sub)total nodal irradiation (30 Gy + 5 Gy) to initially involved areas + 5 Gy to the residual mass. Patients not in CR or PR ³ 75% after four to six cycles received intensive salvage therapy with the MINE regimen (mitoguazone, ifosfamide, Navelbine, and etoposide) followed by BEAM (BCNU, etoposide, Ara-C, and melphalan) and autologous bone marrow or peripheral blood stem-cell transplantation.

The analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis. Histologic review was achieved in 91% of patients at the date of analysis, and 533 patients were eligible.

Patient characteristics did not differ between the treatment groups: age (median, 32 years), stage (III = 40%; IV = 60%), tumoral mass >10 cm (24%), MT ratio (mass/transverse diameter of the thorax) > 0.45 (9%), bone marrow involvement (20%), number of extranodal sites ³ 2 (27%), anemia (29%), lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) > 1 N (44%).

The CR + PR ³ 75% rate after four cycles was 85% (group A, 85%; group B, 85%) and after six cycles was 86% (group A, 88%; group B, 85%).

A total of 418 patients in CR or PR ³ 75% were randomized to receive consolidative chemotherapy (208 patients) or radiotherapy (210 patients). At a median follow-up of 46 months (range, 8-109 months), 152 patients (28%) had progressed and 90 had died, 43 of Hodgkin’s disease and 47 due to other causes, including solid tumors (7 patients), non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL; 5 patients), and acute myelocytic leukemia (AML; 1 patient). Three other patients developed secondary AML and are alive without Hodgkin’s disease.

Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were: Cox regression analysis, including the variables of the international prognostic score for advanced Hodgkin’s disease and consolidative treatment, showed a qualitative interaction between induction regimen and consolidative treatment for OS. After ABVPP and radiotherapy, the risk of death was higher than after chemotherapy (relative risk [RR], 4.37; P = .01). After MOPP/ABV, the benefit of radiotherapy was not significant.

CONCLUSION: These results suggest a role of the induction regimen in tumor control. Chemotherapy alone allows the same or a better survival as chemotherapy plus radiotherapy. A longer follow-up and the analysis of fatal events and of salvage from relapse after radiation therapy will be required to arrive at a definitive conclusion.

Click here for Dr. Bruce Cheson’s commentary on this abstract.

Articles in this issue

WHO Declares Lymphatic Mapping to Be the Standard of Care for Melanoma
Rituximab: Phase II Retreatment Study in Patients With Low-Grade or Follicular Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
Response Criteria for NHL: Importance of “Normal” Lymph Node Size and Correlations With Response
Chemotherapy Plus Radiation Improves Survival in Patients With Cervical Cancer
A Randomized Trial of Fludarabine, Mitoxantrone (FM) Versus Doxorubicin, Cyclophosphamide, Vindesine, Prednisone (CHEP) as First Line Treatment in Patients With Advanced Low-Grade Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: A Multicenter Study by GOELAMS Group
Navelbine Increased Elderly Lung Cancer Patients’ Survival
Fludarabine Versus Conventional CVP Chemotherapy in Newly C Diagnosed Patients With Stages III and IV Low-Grade Malignant Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma: Preliminary Results From a Prospective, Randomized Phase III Clinical Trial in 381 Patients
Multicenter, Phase III Study of Iodine-131 Tositumomab (Anti-B1 Antibody) for Chemotherapy-Refractory Low-Grade or Transformed Low-Grade Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
T-Cell–Depleted Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplant From HLA-Matched Sibling Donors for Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
Consensus Statement on Prevention and Early Diagnosis of Lung Cancer
In Vivo Purging and Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Rituximab During PBSC Transplant For NHL
Fludarabine and Cyclophosphamide: A Highly Active and Well-Tolerated Regimen for Patients With Previously Untreated Indolent Lymphomas
Campath-1H Monoclonal Antibody in Therapy for Advanced Low-Grade Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphomas: A Phase II Study
AIDS Drugs Effective Against Most Common HIV Strain
Rituximab Therapy in Previously Treated Waldenström’s Macroglobulinemia: Preliminary Evidence of Activity
Related Videos
Some patients with large B-cell lymphoma may have to travel a great distance for an initial evaluation for CAR T-cell therapy.
Education is essential to referring oncologists manage toxicities associated with CAR T-cell therapy for patients with large B-cell lymphoma.
There is no absolute age cutoff where CAR T cells are contraindicated for those with large B-cell lymphoma, says David L. Porter, MD.
David L. Porter, MD, emphasizes referring patients with large B-cell lymphoma early for CAR T-cell therapy consultation.
It may be applicable to administer CAR T-cell therapy to patients with large B-cell lymphoma in a community or outpatient setting.
Related Content