A Randomized Trial of Fludarabine, Mitoxantrone (FM) Versus Doxorubicin, Cyclophosphamide, Vindesine, Prednisone (CHEP) as First Line Treatment in Patients With Advanced Low-Grade Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: A Multicenter Study by GOELAMS Group

Publication
Article
OncologyONCOLOGY Vol 13 No 3
Volume 13
Issue 3

The combination of fludarabine and mitoxantrone (FM) has been shown to be an effective regimen for indolent lymphoma (J

The combination of fludarabine and mitoxantrone (FM) has been shown to be an effective regimen for indolent lymphoma (J Clin Oncol 12:575, 1994). From December 1995, patients (age, 55 to 75 years) with newly diagnosed stage II bulky or stage III or IV low-grade NHL (mantle cell lymphoma excluded), and with at least one adverse prognostic parameter, were included in the GOELAMS 05.2 protocol.

After randomization, patients were allocated to a FM or CHEP arm. In the FM arm, patients received fludarabine (20 mg/m²/d intravenously [IV] on days 1-5) and mitoxantrone (10 mg/m² IV on day 1). In the CHEP arm, patients received doxorubicin 25 mg/m² IV on day 1), cyclophosphamide (750 mg/m² IV on day 1), vindesine (3 mg/m² IV on day 1 and on days 1-5), and prednisone (50 mg/m²/d orally). In both arms, patients were to undergo 6 monthly courses of treatment and then courses every other month for 6 months (ie, 9 courses for 1 year). Prophylaxis for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) and herpes zoster was mandated by protocol for patients receiving FM.

Response to treatment was defined according to three categories: complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and failure. Any response less than a PR was considered a treatment failure for this analysis.

From 100 patients registered, 75 were evaluable for response at 6 months and 55 for response at 1 year and for toxicity. At each end point, the two groups were balanced, especially with regard to age, sex, histologic feature (follicular or not), stage, B-symptoms, lactic dehydrogenase level (normal or not), and performance status.

At 6 months, CR, PR, and failure rates were, respectively: 42%, 48%, and 10% for the FM arm vs 9%, 54%, and 37% for the CHEP arm (P = .0008). At 1 year, CR, PR, and failure rates were, respectively: 55%, 30%, and 15% for the FM arm vs 11%, 39%, and 50% for the CHEP arm (P = .003).

Myelosuppression was the most frequent side effect observed in the two arms. The FM regimen was discontinued in two patients due to hemolysis and thrombocytopenia, and almost all of the patients on this arm experienced severe lymphopenia. Three local herpes zoster infections were observed, one in the CHEP arm and two in the FM arm. No PCP infection occurred. There were no toxicity-related deaths.

CONCLUSION: These results confirm the efficacy of FM for untreated patients with low-grade NHL. Prophylactic antibiotics may explain the rarity of opportunistic infections, especially PCP. The FM combination seems to be a promising new regimen for patients with indolent lymphoma.

Click here for Dr. Bruce Cheson’s commentary on this abstract.

Articles in this issue

WHO Declares Lymphatic Mapping to Be the Standard of Care for Melanoma
Rituximab: Phase II Retreatment Study in Patients With Low-Grade or Follicular Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
Response Criteria for NHL: Importance of “Normal” Lymph Node Size and Correlations With Response
Chemotherapy Plus Radiation Improves Survival in Patients With Cervical Cancer
A Randomized Trial of Fludarabine, Mitoxantrone (FM) Versus Doxorubicin, Cyclophosphamide, Vindesine, Prednisone (CHEP) as First Line Treatment in Patients With Advanced Low-Grade Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: A Multicenter Study by GOELAMS Group
Navelbine Increased Elderly Lung Cancer Patients’ Survival
Fludarabine Versus Conventional CVP Chemotherapy in Newly C Diagnosed Patients With Stages III and IV Low-Grade Malignant Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma: Preliminary Results From a Prospective, Randomized Phase III Clinical Trial in 381 Patients
Multicenter, Phase III Study of Iodine-131 Tositumomab (Anti-B1 Antibody) for Chemotherapy-Refractory Low-Grade or Transformed Low-Grade Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
T-Cell–Depleted Allogeneic Bone Marrow Transplant From HLA-Matched Sibling Donors for Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma
Consensus Statement on Prevention and Early Diagnosis of Lung Cancer
In Vivo Purging and Adjuvant Immunotherapy With Rituximab During PBSC Transplant For NHL
Fludarabine and Cyclophosphamide: A Highly Active and Well-Tolerated Regimen for Patients With Previously Untreated Indolent Lymphomas
Campath-1H Monoclonal Antibody in Therapy for Advanced Low-Grade Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphomas: A Phase II Study
AIDS Drugs Effective Against Most Common HIV Strain
Rituximab Therapy in Previously Treated Waldenström’s Macroglobulinemia: Preliminary Evidence of Activity
Related Videos
Some patients with large B-cell lymphoma may have to travel a great distance for an initial evaluation for CAR T-cell therapy.
Education is essential to referring oncologists manage toxicities associated with CAR T-cell therapy for patients with large B-cell lymphoma.
There is no absolute age cutoff where CAR T cells are contraindicated for those with large B-cell lymphoma, says David L. Porter, MD.
David L. Porter, MD, emphasizes referring patients with large B-cell lymphoma early for CAR T-cell therapy consultation.
It may be applicable to administer CAR T-cell therapy to patients with large B-cell lymphoma in a community or outpatient setting.
Findings from a study highlight that 7/8 mismatched unrelated donor posttransplant cyclophosphamide may be a suitable alternative treatment option for those with graft-vs-host disease.
Related Content