Risk Modeling Can Reduce Hospitalizations of Breast Cancer Patients

Publication
Article
OncologyONCOLOGY Vol 16 No 5
Volume 16
Issue 5

Investigators recently reported the results of a study suggesting the benefits of identifying subgroups of breast cancer patients at high risk for hospitalization due to febrile neutropenia. Once identified, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF, Neupogen) might be administered prophylactically to these patients to help decrease the incidence of the side effect. The data were presented at the 24th annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.

Investigators recently reported the results of a studysuggesting the benefits of identifying subgroups of breast cancer patients athigh risk for hospitalization due to febrile neutropenia. Once identified,granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF, Neupogen) might be administeredprophylactically to these patients to help decrease the incidence of the sideeffect. The data were presented at the 24th annual San Antonio Breast CancerSymposium.

"Research has shown that about 20% of early-stage breast cancer patientsreceive a modified regimen of chemotherapy in terms of lowered dose or treatmentdelays because they have developed or are at risk for developing negativeneutropenic events requiring hospitalization," said Dr. Edgardo Rivera,study author and assistant professor, breast medical oncology, M. D. AndersonCancer Center in Houston. "This study suggests that physicians can usevalidated risk models to identify patients who may be at higher risk forchemotherapy-induced neutropenia and then take preventive action to help avoidderailing their chemotherapy."

Chemotherapy Schedule Maintained

The large, open-label, prospective study showed that 95.3% of high-riskpatients who received G-CSF vs 79.9% of high-risk patients in the control groupwere able to receive an effective regimen of chemotherapy on schedule. More thanfour times as many control patients (20.1%) as G-CSF recipients (4.7%) receiveda reduced regimen of chemotherapy due to neutropenia. More than twice as manycontrol patients (7.1%) as G-CSF recipients (2.7%) were hospitalized withfebrile neutropenia.

The study enrolled 624 stage I-III breast cancer patients who received oneof the following adjuvant chemotherapy regimens: doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide(Cytoxan, Neosar), cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/fluorouracil, orcyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/fluorouracil. Following the Silber risk model,patients whose absolute neutrophil count (ANC) reached a nadir of £ 500/mm³ after the first cycle of chemotherapy were assigned to thehigh-risk group, and all other patients were assigned to the low-risk group.

High-risk patients received G-CSF for all subsequent cycles of chemotherapy,starting 24 hours after the administration of chemotherapy and continuing for amaximum of 14 days until their ANC reached ³ 10,000/mm³. Low-risk patientsreceived G-CSF in subsequent chemotherapy cycles only if they developedneutropenia with a fever or had a delay in chemotherapy due to neutropenia. Theother low-risk patients became the control group.

Related Videos
The August CancerNetwork Snap Recap takes a look back at key FDA news updates, as well as expert perspectives on the chemotherapy shortage.
Ann H. Partridge, MD, MPH, talks about how fertility preservation can positively impact the psychosocial health in patients with breast cancer.
Daniel G. Stover, MD, describes how findings from the phase 3 NATALEE trial may support expanding the portion of patients who receive CDK 4/6 inhibitors as a treatment for hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.
Daniel G. Stover, MD, suggests that stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes may serve as a biomarker of immune activation and can potentially help optimize therapy with microtubule-targeting agents for patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Sara M. Tolaney, MD, MPH, discusses how, compared with antibody-drug conjugates, chemotherapy produces low response rates and disease control in the treatment of those with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.
Hope Rugo, MD, speaks to the importance of identifying patients with aromatase inhibitor–resistant, hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who are undergoing treatment with capivasertib/fulvestrant who may be at a high risk of developing diabetes or hyperglycemia.
Sara M. Tolaney, MD, MPH, describes the benefit of sacituzumab govitecan for patients with HER2-low metastatic breast cancer seen in the final overall survival analysis of the phase 3 TROPiCS-02 study.
An expert from Dana-Farber Cancer Institute describes which patients hormone receptor-positive,  HER2-negative breast cancer will benefit most from treatment with sacituzumab govitecan.
An expert from Dana-Farber Cancer Institute highlights the unmet needs that sacituzumab govitecan meets in the treatment of advanced hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.
An expert from Dana-Farber Cancer Institute highlights data that supported the FDA’s approval of sacituzumab govitecan for advanced hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.
Related Content