Tamoxifen Shows No Notable Long-Term Physical Health Decline in BC Survivors

News
Video

“The idea is that the patients are informed of the long-term consequences [of the treatments] so they can have some [input in] decision making,” Clara Bodelon, PhD, MS, stated.

Endocrine therapy showed more favorable results than chemotherapy concerning declining physical health after the treatment of patients with breast cancer. Of methods of endocrine therapy, however, tamoxifen showed even more favorable results than aromatase inhibitors.

CancerNetwork® spoke with Clara Bodelon, PhD, MS, senior principal scientist of survivor research at the American Cancer Society and lead study author, and she spoke about a need to get additional data on the long-term effects of tamoxifen as a treatment. The level of awareness of the long-term effects in relation to physical health decline needs to be increased, she said.

Ultimately, Bodelon emphasized that the goal is for everyone—patients, physicians, and care team members alike—to be well informed on the long-term effects of these treatments, and if tamoxifen doesn’t have any notable decline in long-term physical health, it should be in consideration.

Transcript:

The numbers [on why tamoxifen didn’t show a notable decline in physical health] were small, so we want to continue in the future looking more into that, but tamoxifen has shown in other studies that the consequences—the long-term effects—of tamoxifen may differ…and they may not have an increased risk of cardiovascular disease among women who take tamoxifen, for instance. With aromatase inhibitors, this is less clear. We wanted to distinguish those 2 because the mechanisms of action of these 2 drugs differ. It seems like…because…clinical trials have shown a better outcome on recurrences with aromatase inhibitors, it’s possible that women who receive endocrine therapy may start receiving more aromatase inhibitors. We need to understand what the consequences [are]. The physician needs to understand what all the consequences of these drugs [are] and what the long-term effects [are]. It’s additional information that the physicians need to take care to account [for].

The idea is that the patients are informed of the long-term consequences [of the treatments] so they can have some [input in] decision making, as well as [making sure the] primary care physicians and the entire cancer care team are knowledgeable about the long-term consequences of each treatment, and they can make the appropriate decisions for each woman.

Reference

Bodelon C, Masters M, Bloodworth DE, et al. Physical health decline after chemotherapy or endocrine therapy in breast cancer survivors. JAMA Netw Open. 2025;8(2):e2462365. Published 2025 Feb 3. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.62365

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
“It’s a drug that I’m very comfortable with, and it is a drug I’ll likely use primarily in the first-line setting,” stated Jorge Nieva, MD, on taletrectinib in non–small cell lung cancer.
Those being treated for peritoneal carcinomatosis may not have to experience the complication rates or prolonged recovery associated with surgical options.
For patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, integrating PIPAC into a treatment regimen does not interrupt their systemic therapy.
According to Benjamin J. Golas, MD, PIPAC could be used as a bridging therapy before surgical debulking or between subsequent large surgical operations.
“If you have a [patient in the] fourth or fifth line, [JNJ-5322] could be a valid drug of choice,” said Rakesh Popat, BSc, MBBS, MRCP, FRCPath, PhD.
The trispecific antibody JNJ-5322 demonstrated superior efficacy vs approved agents in multiple myeloma in results shared at the 2025 EHA Congress.
“Dendritic cell vaccines, CAR T-cell therapy, and things of that nature are holding some promise,” said Andrew Brenner, MD, PhD.
Related Content