Tanios Bekaii-Saab, MD, on the Past Year in Gastrointestinal Cancer Research

Video

The medical oncologist at the Mayo Clinic in Phoenix, spoke about the progress seen in gastrointestinal cancer research in 2020, as well as what improvements he hopes will occur in 2021.

Though this year brought many challenges, including navigating the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, advancements in gastrointestinal cancer research still persisted.

In April, during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, the FDA approved pemigatinib (Pemazyre) for advanced cholangiocarcinoma – a first for this patient population. Just a month later, the FDA also approved atezolizumab (Tecentriq) in combination with bevacizumab (Avastin) for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who have not received prior systemic therapy. Moreover, the FDA is still reviewing a slew of agents for the treatment of gastrointestinal cancer.

In an interview with CancerNetwork®, Tanios Bekaii-Saab,MD, a medical oncologist at the Mayo Clinic in Phoenix, Arizona, discussed the advancements made in gastrointestinal cancer in 2020, as well as what improvements he hopes will occur in 2021.

This segment comes from the CancerNetwork® portion of the MJH Life Sciences Medical World News, airing daily on all MJH Life Sciences channels.

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Those being treated for peritoneal carcinomatosis may not have to experience the complication rates or prolonged recovery associated with surgical options.
For patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, integrating PIPAC into a treatment regimen does not interrupt their systemic therapy.
According to Benjamin J. Golas, MD, PIPAC could be used as a bridging therapy before surgical debulking or between subsequent large surgical operations.
According to Benjamin Golas, MD, PIPAC is emerging as minimally invasive laparoscopic approach for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis.
According to Ronan J. Kelly, deciding whether to give nivolumab- or durvalumab-based regimens in gastric cancers may rely on a patient’s frailty.
Five-year follow-up revealed that patients treated with nivolumab vs placebo in the phase 3 CheckMate 577 trial experienced a “doubling” of survival.
Patients treated with nivolumab in the phase 3 CheckMate 577 trial were less likely to experience progression-related treatment discontinuation vs placebo.
Testing a patient’s genetics may influence decisions such as using longer courses of radiotherapy, says Rachit Kumar, MD.
Spatial transcriptomics and multiplex immunohistochemistry from samples may elucidate outcomes for patients who undergo surgical care for cancer.
Related Content