Tislelizumab Shows Improvements in Efficacy Vs Chemo in Esophageal Cancer

Commentary
Video

The toxicity profile of tislelizumab also appears to look better compared with chemotherapy in metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Treatment with tislelizumab-jsgr (Tevimbra) has led to improvements in efficacy outcomes compared with standard chemotherapy for patients with advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), according to Syma Iqbal, MD.

Iqbal spoke with CancerNetwork® about efficacy and safety findings from the phase 3 RATIONALE 302 trial (NCT03430843) that supported the FDA approval of tislelizumab in unresectable or metastatic ESCC following prior systemic chemotherapy. In addition to demonstrating superior efficacy compared with chemotherapy, Iqbal highlighted the agent’s safety profile and said that there were no unexpected toxicities observed during the trial.

Data from the RATIONALE 302 trial indicated a median overall survival of 8.6 months (95% CI, 7.5-10.4) in the tislelizumab arm vs 6.3 months (95% CI, 5.3-7.0) in the chemotherapy arm (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.57-0.85; P = .0001). Common adverse effects associated with tislelizumab included anemia, fatigue, musculoskeletal pain, and laboratory abnormalities.

Iqbal is an associate professor of clinical medicine and the section chief of Gastrointestinal Oncology in the Division of Medical Oncology and a cancer physician in chief at Norris Comprehensive Cancer/Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern California.

Transcript:

RATIONALE 302 is a randomized study for patients who had progressed on chemotherapy who had advanced or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. These patients were entered into study and subsequently randomly assigned to tislelizumab vs standard-of-care chemotherapy. There was superiority in terms of efficacy end points in the patients who received tislelizumab. In fact, the toxicity profile looks better for those patients, as well.

The toxicity profile looked better than chemotherapy; it didn’t necessarily improve the outcomes. But when you compare the toxicity of the 2 arms, overall, it looked better for the patients who received the tislelizumab. There weren’t any adverse events that were unexpected from these checkpoint inhibitors. The toxicities that we’re seeing are similar to what we see with other checkpoint inhibitors, so it’s just those class effects. There weren’t other untoward or unexpected toxicities.

Reference

BeiGene receives FDA approval for TEVIMBRA for the treatment of advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after prior chemotherapy. News release. BeiGene. March 14, 2024. Accessed April 4, 2024. https://shorturl.at/bzZ37

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Extravasation with beta emitters may elicit more drastic adverse effects due to their higher radiation dose.
Increasing the use of patient-reported outcomes may ensure that practitioners can fully ascertain the impact of treatment for rare lymphomas.
Photographic and written documentation can help providers recognize inflammatory breast cancer symptoms across diverse populations.
The use of guideline-concordant care in breast cancer appears to be more common in White populations than Black populations.
Retrospective and real-world registry studies may be necessary to guide clinical decision-making for rarer lymphomas with insufficient prospective data.
Extravasation results in exposing healthy tissue to radiation, which can be highly dosed depending on the isotope used for treatment.
Ongoing studies seek to evaluate immunotherapy in earlier lines of therapy for patients with early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma.
Strict inclusion criteria may disproportionately exclude racial minority populations from participating in breast cancer trials.
Related Content