Tislelizumab Shows Improvements in Efficacy Vs Chemo in Esophageal Cancer

Commentary
Video

The toxicity profile of tislelizumab also appears to look better compared with chemotherapy in metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Treatment with tislelizumab-jsgr (Tevimbra) has led to improvements in efficacy outcomes compared with standard chemotherapy for patients with advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), according to Syma Iqbal, MD.

Iqbal spoke with CancerNetwork® about efficacy and safety findings from the phase 3 RATIONALE 302 trial (NCT03430843) that supported the FDA approval of tislelizumab in unresectable or metastatic ESCC following prior systemic chemotherapy. In addition to demonstrating superior efficacy compared with chemotherapy, Iqbal highlighted the agent’s safety profile and said that there were no unexpected toxicities observed during the trial.

Data from the RATIONALE 302 trial indicated a median overall survival of 8.6 months (95% CI, 7.5-10.4) in the tislelizumab arm vs 6.3 months (95% CI, 5.3-7.0) in the chemotherapy arm (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.57-0.85; P = .0001). Common adverse effects associated with tislelizumab included anemia, fatigue, musculoskeletal pain, and laboratory abnormalities.

Iqbal is an associate professor of clinical medicine and the section chief of Gastrointestinal Oncology in the Division of Medical Oncology and a cancer physician in chief at Norris Comprehensive Cancer/Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern California.

Transcript:

RATIONALE 302 is a randomized study for patients who had progressed on chemotherapy who had advanced or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus. These patients were entered into study and subsequently randomly assigned to tislelizumab vs standard-of-care chemotherapy. There was superiority in terms of efficacy end points in the patients who received tislelizumab. In fact, the toxicity profile looks better for those patients, as well.

The toxicity profile looked better than chemotherapy; it didn’t necessarily improve the outcomes. But when you compare the toxicity of the 2 arms, overall, it looked better for the patients who received the tislelizumab. There weren’t any adverse events that were unexpected from these checkpoint inhibitors. The toxicities that we’re seeing are similar to what we see with other checkpoint inhibitors, so it’s just those class effects. There weren’t other untoward or unexpected toxicities.

Reference

BeiGene receives FDA approval for TEVIMBRA for the treatment of advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after prior chemotherapy. News release. BeiGene. March 14, 2024. Accessed April 4, 2024. https://shorturl.at/bzZ37

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
“It’s a drug that I’m very comfortable with, and it is a drug I’ll likely use primarily in the first-line setting,” stated Jorge Nieva, MD, on taletrectinib in non–small cell lung cancer.
Those being treated for peritoneal carcinomatosis may not have to experience the complication rates or prolonged recovery associated with surgical options.
For patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, integrating PIPAC into a treatment regimen does not interrupt their systemic therapy.
According to Benjamin J. Golas, MD, PIPAC could be used as a bridging therapy before surgical debulking or between subsequent large surgical operations.
“If you have a [patient in the] fourth or fifth line, [JNJ-5322] could be a valid drug of choice,” said Rakesh Popat, BSc, MBBS, MRCP, FRCPath, PhD.
The trispecific antibody JNJ-5322 demonstrated superior efficacy vs approved agents in multiple myeloma in results shared at the 2025 EHA Congress.
“Dendritic cell vaccines, CAR T-cell therapy, and things of that nature are holding some promise,” said Andrew Brenner, MD, PhD.
Related Content