Toni Choueiri, MD, on What Multidisciplinary Stakeholders Should Know About CheckMate 9ER

Video

In the phase 3 CheckMate 9ER trial, investigators found that nivolumab plus cabozantinib demonstrated improved efficacy and prolonged survival among patients with previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Results from the phase 3 CheckMate 9ER trial (NCT03141177) presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) 2021 Genitourinary Cancer Symposium revealed that nivolumab (Opdivo) plus cabozantinib (Cabometyx) demonstrated improved efficacy and prolonged survival compared with sunitinib (Sutent) among patients with previously untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), regardless of sarcomatoid status.1

In an interview with CancerNetwork®, Toni Choueiri, MD, director of the Lank Center for Genitourinary (GU) Oncology at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women’s Hospital and the Jerome and Nancy Kohlberg Chair and professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School, explained how these results impact multidisciplinary stakeholders in the oncology community.

Transcription:

During [the Genitourinary Cancers Symposium], we presented the patient-reported outcomes for the combination of cabozantinib [plus] nivolumab versus sunitinib. Recently, that combination was approved in January 2021 by the FDA. [At the meeting, we] presented very extensive and new health-related quality of life instrument measures in this study; FKSI-19 [Kidney Symptom Index 19] and many subsets of FKSI-19, as well EQ-5D-3L, VAS [visual analog scale], and others are all patient-reported outcomes and have been for some time. And I’m glad that these were presented in a comprehensive way.

Like the initial presentation, which had some quality-of-life data during [the European Society for Medical Oncology 2020 Congress],2 this extensive presentation continued to show that the combination of cabozantinib at 40 mg per day and the PD-1 inhibitor nivolumab provided consistent, really healthy quality-of-life benefit over sunitinib with statistically significant differences between the treatment arm favoring the combination. There was a delay in deterioration and significant decreased risk of confirmed deterioration in the health-related quality of life measures and scores, including in disease-related kidney cancer symptoms. If you couple this with the efficacy data that Dr. Motzer updated during ASCO GU 2021, you do have now a superior clinical efficacy with the combination coupled with additional benefit of better health-related quality of life. This supports the acceptable tolerability profile of that combination in advanced renal cell cancer.

References:

1. Motzer RJ, Choueiri TK, Powles T, et al. Nivolumab + cabozantinib (NIVO+CABO) versus sunitinib (SUN) for advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC): Outcomes by sarcomatoid histology and updated trial results with extended follow-up of CheckMate 9ER. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(suppl 6):308. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2021.39.6_suppl.308

2. Choueiri T, Powles T, Burotto M, et al. Nivolumab + cabozantinib vs sunitinib in first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma: First results from the randomized phase III CheckMate 9ER trial. Ann Oncol. 2020;31(suppl 4):S1142-S1215. doi: 10.1016/annonc/annonc325

Recent Videos
Paolo Tarantino, MD discusses updated breast cancer trial findings presented at ESMO 2024 supporting the use of agents such as T-DXd and ribociclib.
Higher, durable rates of response to frontline therapy are needed to potentially improve long-term survival among patients with non–small cell lung cancer.
A review of patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma shows radiological tumor burden as an independent prognostic factor for survival.
A phase 2 trial is assessing ubamatamab in patients with MUC16-expressing SMARCB1-deficient renal medullary carcinoma and epithelioid sarcoma.
Analysis of 2 phase 1 trials compared gut biome diversity between standard of care with or without CBM588 in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Although no responses were observed in 11 patients receiving abemaciclib monotherapy, combination therapies with abemaciclib may offer clinical benefit.
Findings show no difference in overall survival between various treatments for metastatic RCC previously managed with immunotherapy and TKIs.
An epigenomic profiling approach may help pick up the entire tumor burden, thereby assisting with detecting sarcomatoid features in those with RCC.
Future meetings may address how immunotherapy, bispecific agents, and CAR T-cell therapies can further impact the AML treatment paradigm.
Related Content