Global BulletinAll NewsFDA Approval AlertWomen in Oncology
Expert InterviewsAround the PracticeBetween the LinesFace OffFrom All AnglesMeeting of the MindsOncViewPodcastsTraining AcademyTreatment Algorithms with the Oncology BrothersVideos
Conferences
All JournalsEditorial BoardFor AuthorsYear in Review
Frontline ForumSatellite Sessions
CME/CE
Awareness MonthInteractive ToolsNurse Practitioners/Physician's AssistantsPartnersSponsoredSponsored Media
Career CenterSubscribe
Adverse Effects
Brain Cancer
Breast CancerBreast CancerBreast Cancer
Gastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal Cancer
Genitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary Cancers
Gynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic Cancers
Head & Neck Cancer
Hematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic Oncology
InfectionInfection
Leukemia
Lung CancerLung CancerLung Cancer
Lymphoma
Neuroendocrine Tumors
Oncology
Pediatric Cancers
Radiation Oncology
Sarcoma
Screening
Skin Cancer & Melanoma
Surgery
Thyroid Cancer
Spotlight -
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Surgery
Adverse Effects
Brain Cancer
Breast CancerBreast CancerBreast Cancer
Gastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal Cancer
Genitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary Cancers
Gynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic Cancers
Head & Neck Cancer
Hematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic Oncology
InfectionInfection
Leukemia
Lung CancerLung CancerLung Cancer
Lymphoma
Neuroendocrine Tumors
Oncology
Pediatric Cancers
Radiation Oncology
Sarcoma
Screening
Skin Cancer & Melanoma
Surgery
Thyroid Cancer
    • Conferences
    • CME/CE
    • Career Center
    • Subscribe

Your AI-Trained Oncology Knowledge Connection!

scout
Advertisement

Treatment-Related Regret Varys by Approach in Prostate Cancer

March 25, 2022
By Ariana Pelosci
Article

Patients with prostate cancer who received surgery had the highest rate of treatment-related regret followed by radiotherapy and active surveillance.

Treatment-related regret was reported in 1 in 10 patients with localized prostate cancer, with rates of regret being dependent on the approach, according to results from a cohort study published in JAMA Oncology.

Five years following diagnosis, treatment-related regret was most common in patients who underwent surgery (16%) followed by radiotherapy (11%) and active surveillance (7%). Patients receiving active treatment vs active surveillance had an increase of regret among those underwent surgery (adjusted OR, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.44-4.01) and not radiotherapy (adjusted OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 0.88-2.66). In particular, change in sexual function from baseline was significantly associated with regret, although similar associations were not identified with regard to other patient-reported functional outcomes, (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.52-0.81).

A total of 3277 patients from the prospective, population-based comparative effectiveness analysis of surgery and radiation (CEASAR) cohort were included, of whom 2072 were included in the analysis. Within this cohort, 1136 men had surgery, 667 had radiotherapy, and 269 had active surveillance. At the time of diagnosis, the median age was 64 years.

At 5 years, 13% (95% CI, 12%-15%) of patients said they had treatment regret. This was commonly seen among 71% of patients (95% CI, 55%-87%) who subjectively judged treatment effectiveness and 48% of patients (95% CI, 41%-55%) who thought treatment adverse effects were worse than expected.

Compared with active survellience, patients with low-risk disease who underwent surgery were more likely to regret their decision (adjusted OR, 2.73; 95% CI, 1.45-5.14), although the same could not be said for those receiving radiotherapy (adjusted OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 0.90-3.68). The same was found for the intermediate-risk population for both surgery (adjusted OR, 2.26; 95% CI, 0.85-6.05) and radiotherapy (adjusted OR, 1.56; 95% CI, 0.56-4.32). Finally, those with high-risk disease had a nonsignificant lower likelihood of regret when receiving surgery (adjusted OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.09-2.99) or radiotherapy (adjusted OR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.03-1.27). However, statistical significance was only confirmed in the low-risk group who underwent surgery (P = .002).

As treatment-related regret was likely altered via functional outcomes, the analysis was repeated with the inclusion of longitudinal change in patient-reported functional outcomes, treatment-related health problems, and patients’ perceptions of treatment efficacy. Patients low-risk disease on active treatment continued to have the highest likelihood of regret among those undergoing surgery (adjusted OR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.05-4.13) but not radiotherapy (adjusted OR, 1.69; 95% CI, 0.79-3.62). Similar findings were reported in the intermediate-risk group for both surgery (adjusted OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 0.51-4.43) and radiotherapy (adjusted OR, 1.42; 95% CI, 0.47-4.35). Additionally, patients with high-risk disease who underwent radiotherapy (adjusted OR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.02-0.92) and surgery (adjusted OR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.04-1.81) had a lower likelihood of regret.

Compared with other examined variables such as expectations, patient perspective of treatment effectiveness (adjusted OR, 5.40; 95% CI, 2.51-13.56) and treatment adverse effects (adjusted OR, 5.83; 95% CI, 3.97-8.58) were more notably associated with regret.

With regard to characteristics that were evaluated at baseline including participatory decision-making tool (PDM-7) scores (adjusted OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.69-0.92), social support (adjusted OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.67-0.90), and age (adjusted OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62-0.97) were independently inversely correlated with regret.

Investigators found that social support and age at diagnosis were no longer significantly associated with developing regret, although higher education status was protective (adjusted OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.51-0.93).

Reference

Wallis CJD, Zhao Z, Huang LC, et al. Association of treatment modality, functional outcomes, and baseline characteristics with treatment-related regret among men with localized prostate cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2022;8(1):50-59. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.5160

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Subscribe Now!
Recent Videos
Prior studies, like the phase 3 VISION trial, may support the notion of combining radiopharmaceuticals with best supportive care.
Beta emitters like 177Lu-rosopatamab may offer built-in PSMA imaging during the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Related Content

The FDA has accepted a new drug application for the prostate-specific membrane antigen PET imaging agent.

FDA Accepts NDA for New Formulation of PSMA PET Injection in Prostate Cancer

Tim Cortese
August 12th 2025
Article

Sharpening the Prostate Cancer Toolkit: Practical Insights on PSMA Imaging

Sharpening the Prostate Cancer Toolkit: Practical Insights on PSMA Imaging

Manojkumar Bupathi, MD, MS;Benjamin Garmezy, MD;Mike Lattanzi, MD;Damian N. Sorce, MD
August 12th 2025
Podcast

Findings from the phase 3 TALAPRO-2 trial showed that the safety profile of talazoparib was consistent with its known profile in metastatic CRPC.

Talazoparib Combo Significantly Improves Overall Survival in Metastatic CRPC

Roman Fabbricatore
August 12th 2025
Article

1 expert in this video

Prolaris in Practice: Guiding ADT Benefits, Clinical Application, and Expert Insights From ACRO 2025

Steven Finkelstein, MD, DABR, FACRO
August 12th 2025
Podcast

More detailed overall survival results from the phase 3 EMBARK trial for patients with nmHSPC will be shared at an upcoming medical conference.

Enzalutamide Prolongs Survival in nmHSPC With Biochemical Recurrence

Tim Cortese
August 12th 2025
Article

Discover the latest advancements in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer care, including personalized treatment strategies and emerging therapies.

3 Things You Should Know About Advancing mCRPC Care: Targeted Sequencing, Epigenetics, and Emerging Strategies

ONCOLOGY Staff
August 12th 2025
Article
Related Content

The FDA has accepted a new drug application for the prostate-specific membrane antigen PET imaging agent.

FDA Accepts NDA for New Formulation of PSMA PET Injection in Prostate Cancer

Tim Cortese
August 12th 2025
Article

Sharpening the Prostate Cancer Toolkit: Practical Insights on PSMA Imaging

Sharpening the Prostate Cancer Toolkit: Practical Insights on PSMA Imaging

Manojkumar Bupathi, MD, MS;Benjamin Garmezy, MD;Mike Lattanzi, MD;Damian N. Sorce, MD
August 12th 2025
Podcast

Findings from the phase 3 TALAPRO-2 trial showed that the safety profile of talazoparib was consistent with its known profile in metastatic CRPC.

Talazoparib Combo Significantly Improves Overall Survival in Metastatic CRPC

Roman Fabbricatore
August 12th 2025
Article

1 expert in this video

Prolaris in Practice: Guiding ADT Benefits, Clinical Application, and Expert Insights From ACRO 2025

Steven Finkelstein, MD, DABR, FACRO
August 12th 2025
Podcast

More detailed overall survival results from the phase 3 EMBARK trial for patients with nmHSPC will be shared at an upcoming medical conference.

Enzalutamide Prolongs Survival in nmHSPC With Biochemical Recurrence

Tim Cortese
August 12th 2025
Article

Discover the latest advancements in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer care, including personalized treatment strategies and emerging therapies.

3 Things You Should Know About Advancing mCRPC Care: Targeted Sequencing, Epigenetics, and Emerging Strategies

ONCOLOGY Staff
August 12th 2025
Article
Advertisement
About
Advertise
CureToday.com
OncLive.com
OncNursingNews.com
TargetedOnc.com
Editorial
Contact
Terms and Conditions
Privacy
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Contact Info

2 Commerce Drive
Cranbury, NJ 08512

609-716-7777

© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.