Global BulletinAll NewsFDA Approval AlertWomen in Oncology
Expert InterviewsAround the PracticeBetween the LinesFace OffFrom All AnglesMeeting of the MindsOncViewPodcastsTraining AcademyTreatment Algorithms with the Oncology BrothersVideos
Conferences
All JournalsEditorial BoardFor AuthorsYear in Review
Frontline ForumSatellite Sessions
CME/CE
Awareness MonthNurse Practitioners/Physician's AssistantsPartnersSponsoredSponsored Media
Career CenterSubscribe
Adverse Effects
Brain Cancer
Breast CancerBreast CancerBreast Cancer
Gastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal Cancer
Genitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary Cancers
Gynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic Cancers
Head & Neck Cancer
Hematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic Oncology
InfectionInfection
Leukemia
Lung CancerLung CancerLung Cancer
Lymphoma
Neuroendocrine Tumors
Oncology
Pediatric Cancers
Radiation Oncology
Sarcoma
Screening
Skin Cancer & Melanoma
Surgery
Thyroid Cancer
Spotlight -
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Surgery
Adverse Effects
Brain Cancer
Breast CancerBreast CancerBreast Cancer
Gastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal CancerGastrointestinal Cancer
Genitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary CancersGenitourinary Cancers
Gynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic CancersGynecologic Cancers
Head & Neck Cancer
Hematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic OncologyHematologic Oncology
InfectionInfection
Leukemia
Lung CancerLung CancerLung Cancer
Lymphoma
Neuroendocrine Tumors
Oncology
Pediatric Cancers
Radiation Oncology
Sarcoma
Screening
Skin Cancer & Melanoma
Surgery
Thyroid Cancer
    • Conferences
    • CME/CE
    • Career Center
    • Subscribe

Your AI-Trained Oncology Knowledge Connection!

scout
Advertisement

(P044) Comparison of Toxicity-Related Breaks in Treatment Utilizing Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) vs Three-Dimensional (3D) Conformal Techniques in the Treatment of Anal Cancer

April 15, 2016
Publication
Article
OncologyOncology Vol 30 No 4_Suppl_1
Volume 30
Issue 4_Suppl_1
Conference|Annual Meeting of the American Radium Society (ARS)

In our small cohorts, no significant difference was seen in toxicity-related treatment breaks between IMRT and three-dimensional conformal RT.

Eric Kemmerer, MD, Abhishek Mishra, Shreyas Ranganna,  Roderick Price, Lydia Komarnicky, MD, Jaganmohan Poli, MD; Drexel University

PURPOSE: The definitive treatment of patients with anal cancer using radiation therapy (RT) and concurrent 5-fluoropyrimidine (5-FU) and mitomycin-C (MMC) is associated with acute toxicities during treatment, which may necessitate a break in RT. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trial 0529 reported a significant decrease in grade ≥ 3 dermatologic and gastrointestinal acute toxicities with the use of dose-painted intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) vs three-dimensional conformal RT (3DCRT) techniques. Here, we investigate whether IMRT use may result in fewer toxicity-related treatment breaks in a cohort of patients treated at our institution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2005–2015, a total of 22 patients with T1–4N0–3M0 squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal treated with IMRT (n = 12) or 3DCRT (n = 10) were identified. Median total dose to the primary tumor overall was 50.4 Gy, with a median dose of 45 Gy (range: 45–55.8 Gy) in the 3DCRT cohort and 50.4 Gy (range: 46.8–54 Gy) in the IMRT cohort. Median age was 51 years. Further, 79% of patients received 5-FU and MMC, two patients (9%) received 3DCRT with 5-FU only, and one patient (4.5%) received 3DCRT without chemotherapy. Patients who had a documented treatment break for grade ≥ 3 acute toxicity were identified, as was the corresponding elapsed day of treatment on which the first break occurred. Time to first treatment break was examined using Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank testing.

RESULTS: Overall, cumulatively, 16 patients (73%) required a treatment break, at a median of 18 days of elapsed treatment. Also, 92% and 50% of IMRT and 3DCRT patients required treatment breaks, respectively (log-rank test P = .141).

CONCLUSION: In our small cohorts, no significant difference was seen in toxicity-related treatment breaks between IMRT and 3DCRT.  

Proceedings of the 98th Annual Meeting of the American Radium Society -americanradiumsociety.org

Articles in this issue

(S002) A 15-Year Review of Radiation Therapy for Keloids at Two Institutions
(S003) Single-Fraction Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma Bony Metastases Provides Pain Control and Decreases Time to Chemotherapy
(S001) Prognostic Value of Pretreatment Serum Inflammatory Markers in Patients Receiving Radiation Therapy for Oropharyngeal Cancer
(S004) Trend in Second Malignancy Risk for Head and Neck Cancer With Increased Utilization of IMRT: Analysis of SEER Database
(S005) Comparison of Legal Needs of a Group of Patients With Cancer: Economic and Geographic Factors
(S006) Mission Improvement: Lessons From Initiating a Resident-Led Quality Improvement Project on Smoking Cessation at a County Hospital

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Subscribe Now!
Recent Videos
Related Content

A statistically significant difference was observed between the 2 groups in patients who received second-line therapy.

Cisplatin/Carboplatin Plus Etoposide Yield Similar Real-World Efficacy in ES-SCLC

Tim Cortese
September 17th 2025
Article

A panel of clinical pharmacists discussed strategies for mitigating toxicities across different multiple myeloma, lymphoma, and leukemia populations.

Navigating AE Management for Cellular Therapy Across Hematologic Cancers

Tiba Al Sagheer, PharmD, BCOP, BCACP;Rebecca Gonzalez, PharmD, BCOP, FASTCT;Syeda Saba Kareem PharmD, BCOP
September 17th 2025
Podcast

Numerically higher ORRs were reported in those who received treatment in the second line vs third line, in those with a CTFI of 90 days or more, and those without CNS metastasis.

Lurbinectedin Yields Responses in Various ES-SCLC Subgroups

Tim Cortese
September 17th 2025
Article

Experts share their perspectives on updated clinical trial results, personalized cancer vaccine research, and other notable developments in kidney cancer.

Key Advances Across Kidney Cancer Research and Management at KCRS 2025

Thomas Powles, MBBS, MCRP, MD;David Braun, MD, PhD;Wenxin (Vincent) Xu, MD;Eric Jonasch, MD
September 17th 2025
Podcast

All efficacy-evaluable patients with ES-SCLC treated with surufatinib, durvalumab, etoposide, and chemotherapy responded to treatment.

Surufatinib Combo Displays Promising Efficacy in Frontline ES-SCLC

Roman Fabbricatore
September 17th 2025
Article

The second takeaway is that the type of responses and efficacy that we have seen with these combinations rival what we have in our standard of care armamentarium.

How Promising Are Immunotherapy Combos in Indolent Lymphoma?

Tim Cortese
September 17th 2025
Article
Related Content

A statistically significant difference was observed between the 2 groups in patients who received second-line therapy.

Cisplatin/Carboplatin Plus Etoposide Yield Similar Real-World Efficacy in ES-SCLC

Tim Cortese
September 17th 2025
Article

A panel of clinical pharmacists discussed strategies for mitigating toxicities across different multiple myeloma, lymphoma, and leukemia populations.

Navigating AE Management for Cellular Therapy Across Hematologic Cancers

Tiba Al Sagheer, PharmD, BCOP, BCACP;Rebecca Gonzalez, PharmD, BCOP, FASTCT;Syeda Saba Kareem PharmD, BCOP
September 17th 2025
Podcast

Numerically higher ORRs were reported in those who received treatment in the second line vs third line, in those with a CTFI of 90 days or more, and those without CNS metastasis.

Lurbinectedin Yields Responses in Various ES-SCLC Subgroups

Tim Cortese
September 17th 2025
Article

Experts share their perspectives on updated clinical trial results, personalized cancer vaccine research, and other notable developments in kidney cancer.

Key Advances Across Kidney Cancer Research and Management at KCRS 2025

Thomas Powles, MBBS, MCRP, MD;David Braun, MD, PhD;Wenxin (Vincent) Xu, MD;Eric Jonasch, MD
September 17th 2025
Podcast

All efficacy-evaluable patients with ES-SCLC treated with surufatinib, durvalumab, etoposide, and chemotherapy responded to treatment.

Surufatinib Combo Displays Promising Efficacy in Frontline ES-SCLC

Roman Fabbricatore
September 17th 2025
Article

The second takeaway is that the type of responses and efficacy that we have seen with these combinations rival what we have in our standard of care armamentarium.

How Promising Are Immunotherapy Combos in Indolent Lymphoma?

Tim Cortese
September 17th 2025
Article
Advertisement
About
Advertise
CureToday.com
OncLive.com
OncNursingNews.com
TargetedOnc.com
Editorial
Contact
Terms and Conditions
Privacy
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Contact Info

259 Prospect Plains Rd, Bldg H,
Monroe, NJ 08831

609-716-7777

© 2025 MJH Life Sciences

All rights reserved.