37 Estimating the Direct and Indirect Resource Burden of Treatment Management With Current Standard of Care or Elacestrant for ER+, HER2–, ESR1-Mutated Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients: A Population- Level Provider Model

Publication
Article
Miami Breast Cancer Conference® Abstracts Supplement41st Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference® - Abstracts
Volume 38
Issue 4
Pages: 41-42

37 Estimating the Direct and Indirect Resource Burden of Treatment Management With Current Standard of Care or Elacestrant for ER+, HER2–, ESR1-Mutated Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients: A Population- Level Provider Model

37 Estimating the Direct and Indirect Resource Burden of Treatment Management With Current Standard of Care or Elacestrant for ER+, HER2–, ESR1-Mutated Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients: A Population- Level Provider Model

Background

Breast cancer continues to have a large impact on the global burden in terms of morbidity and health care resource utilization (HRU). Endocrine therapy (ET) plus CDK4/6 inhibitor is the mainstay for the management of estrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/HER2- negative (HER2–) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) as first-line therapy; however, tumors eventually develop resistance to ET. ESR1 mutations represent a type of acquired resistance in up to 40% of patients that predominantly occurs after ET, particularly aromatase inhibitors, reducing the efficacy of available regimens. In the phase 3 EMERALD study, elacestrant was associated with significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and a manageable safety profile vs standard of care (SOC) ET in patients with ER+/HER2–, ESR1 mutations advanced mBC, leading to the first oral selective estrogen receptor degrader (SERD) being approved. Patients receiving elacestrant demonstrated a median PFS of 3.8 months vs 1.9 months with SOC ET (Bidard, 2022). Patients who received at least 12 months of prior CDK4/6 inhibitors experienced a PFS of 8.6 months with elacestrant vs
1.9 months with SOC ET. Understanding the resource implications of elacestrant as a novel treatment strategy is essential for health care decision-makers, providers, and patients.

Methods

A decision analytic model estimated the clinical events and HRU offsets resulting from treating patients with elacestrant over a 3-year time horizon. This analysis estimated the average number of patients with disease progression following at least 1 line of ET treated at a facility each year. Outcomes included the number of deaths, adverse effects (AEs), hospital days due to AEs, fulvestrant administration, outpatient visits, inpatient visits, emergency department (ED) visits, and lost hours avoided, including the number of patients requiring subsequent treatment. The model analyzed a scenario in which the current treatment mix of eligible patients converted to elacestrant.

Results

Among about 500 patients with breast cancer per facility, 21 patients were estimated to be eligible for treatment each year, totaling 64 patients over the modeled time horizon. Elacestrant led to a reduction in the number of clinical events, with 1 death and 27 grade 3 or higher AEs avoided. Reductions in HRU were observed with 131 fewer hospital days; 791 fewer fulvestrant administrations; and a reduction in 1449 outpatient, 215 inpatient, and 55 ED visits. The number of hours of missed work avoided and activity impairment avoided were estimated to be 5853 hours and 6082 hours, respectively.

Conclusions

This decision analytic model demonstrated that treating patients with elacestrant resulted in a meaningful reduction in the number of clinical and health care resource utilization events while showing improvements in work productivity and activities of daily living.

Articles in this issue

31 Adjuvant Abemaciclib Plus Endocrine Therapy for HR+, HER2–, High-Risk Early Breast Cancer: Results From a Preplanned MonarchE Overall Survival Interim Analysis, Including 5-Year Efficacy Outcomes
31 Adjuvant Abemaciclib Plus Endocrine Therapy for HR+, HER2–, High-Risk Early Breast Cancer: Results From a Preplanned MonarchE Overall Survival Interim Analysis, Including 5-Year Efficacy Outcomes
32 Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Chemotherapy Followed by Adjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo for Early-Stage Triple- Negative Breast Cancer: Updated Event-Free Survival Results From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-522 Study
32 Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Chemotherapy Followed by Adjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo for Early-Stage Triple- Negative Breast Cancer: Updated Event-Free Survival Results From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-522 Study
33 MammaPrint® and BluePrint® Predict Anthracycline Chemosensitivity in Patients With HR+HER2– Early-Stage Breast Cancer Enrolled in FLEX
33 MammaPrint® and BluePrint® Predict Anthracycline Chemosensitivity in Patients With HR+HER2– Early-Stage Breast Cancer Enrolled in FLEX
34 How Mobile Computing Devices Offer Support for Classic and Molecular Multidisciplinary and Tumor Boards
34 How Mobile Computing Devices Offer Support for Classic and Molecular Multidisciplinary and Tumor Boards
35 Impact of Comorbidities on Real-World (rw) Clinical Outcomes of Patients (pts) With Hormone Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative (HR+/HER2–) Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC) Treated With Palbociclib (PAL) and Enrolled in POLARIS
35 Impact of Comorbidities on Real-World (rw) Clinical Outcomes of Patients (pts) With Hormone Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative (HR+/HER2–) Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC) Treated With Palbociclib (PAL) and Enrolled in POLARIS
36 MONARCH 3: Final Overall Survival Results of Abemaciclib Plus a Nonsteroidal Aromatase Inhibitor as First-Line Therapy for HR+/HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer
36 MONARCH 3: Final Overall Survival Results of Abemaciclib Plus a Nonsteroidal Aromatase Inhibitor as First-Line Therapy for HR+/HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer
37 Estimating the Direct and Indirect Resource Burden of Treatment Management With Current Standard of Care or Elacestrant for ER+, HER2–, ESR1-Mutated Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients: A Population- Level Provider Model
37 Estimating the Direct and Indirect Resource Burden of Treatment Management With Current Standard of Care or Elacestrant for ER+, HER2–, ESR1-Mutated Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients: A Population- Level Provider Model
38 Influence of Race on Attainment of Textbook Oncologic Outcome Following Modified Radical Mastectomy for Breast Cancer
38 Influence of Race on Attainment of Textbook Oncologic Outcome Following Modified Radical Mastectomy for Breast Cancer
39 The Influence of Reconstruction Type on Outcomes in Women Undergoing Mastectomy With Immediate Reconstruction:  A Nationwide Study
39 The Influence of Reconstruction Type on Outcomes in Women Undergoing Mastectomy With Immediate Reconstruction: A Nationwide Study
40 Ethnic Disparities in Complication Rates and Outcomes  of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy:  A Comprehensive Analysis
40 Ethnic Disparities in Complication Rates and Outcomes of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: A Comprehensive Analysis
41 A Case Series of Sarcomas
41 A Case Series of Sarcomas
42 Transitional Lymphedema: Understanding the Temporal Dynamics Post-Axillary Surgery
42 Transitional Lymphedema: Understanding the Temporal Dynamics Post-Axillary Surgery
43 Impact of Lymphatic Microsurgical Preventing Healing Approach (LYMPHA) on Postoperative Complication Rates in Mastectomy With Immediate Prosthetic-Based Breast Reconstruction
43 Impact of Lymphatic Microsurgical Preventing Healing Approach (LYMPHA) on Postoperative Complication Rates in Mastectomy With Immediate Prosthetic-Based Breast Reconstruction
44 Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS) Genetic Testing Results and Mastectomy Choice in Lumpectomy-Eligible Patients
44 Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS) Genetic Testing Results and Mastectomy Choice in Lumpectomy-Eligible Patients
45 Application of the 7-Gene Biosignature in Palpable Versus Nonpalpable Ductal Carcinoma In Situ in a Black Patient Population: Does Palpability Suggest a More Aggressive Genomic Risk?
45 Application of the 7-Gene Biosignature in Palpable Versus Nonpalpable Ductal Carcinoma In Situ in a Black Patient Population: Does Palpability Suggest a More Aggressive Genomic Risk?
Recent Videos
Paolo Tarantino, MD, discusses the potential utility of agents such as datopotamab deruxtecan and enfortumab vedotin in patients with breast cancer.
Paolo Tarantino, MD, highlights strategies related to screening and multidisciplinary collaboration for managing ILD in patients who receive T-DXd.
Pegulicianine-guided breast cancer surgery may allow practices to de-escalate subsequent radiotherapy, says Barbara Smith, MD, PhD.
Barbara Smith, MD, PhD, spoke about the potential use of pegulicianine-guided breast cancer surgery based on reports from the phase 3 INSITE trial.
Carey Anders, MD, an expert on breast cancer
Related Content