53 Comparison of Surgical Complications With Direct-to-Implant vs Tissue Expander Reconstruction After Wise Pattern Skin-Sparing Mastectomy

Publication
Article
Miami Breast Cancer Conference® Abstracts Supplement42nd Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference® - Abstracts
Volume 39
Issue 4
Pages: 48-49

53 Comparison of Surgical Complications With Direct-to-Implant vs Tissue Expander Reconstruction After Wise Pattern Skin-Sparing Mastectomy

53 Comparison of Surgical Complications With Direct-to-Implant vs Tissue Expander Reconstruction After Wise Pattern Skin-Sparing Mastectomy

Background

Wise Pattern Mastectomy is a common incision utilized in patients with large, ptotic breasts undergoing skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction (IBR). This incision pattern is associated with an increased risk of delayed wound healing and skin necrosis, which may be further influenced by the type of IBR performed. We compared surgical complications in patients undergoing IBR with Direct-to-Implant (DTI) vs Tissue Expander (TE) after Wise Pattern Skin-Sparing Mastectomy (WSSM).

Materials and Methods

Patients who underwent WSSM and IBR from 2019 to 2023 were selected. Patient characteristics, clinical features, and surgical complications were compared between patients who underwent DTI vs TE IBR. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with major complications (surgical site infection [SSI], skin necrosis requiring reoperation, and reconstruction loss) and any 30-day complication controlling for patient age, race, ethnicity, body mass index (BMI), presence of diabetes, tobacco use, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, reason for mastectomy, axillary surgery, mastectomy weight, and type of reconstruction.

Status

A total of 144 patients who underwent 217 mastectomies were evaluated: 73 bilateral (51%) and 71 unilateral (49%); 117 DTI (54%) and 100 TE (46%). (Table) Most patients were ≥ 50 years old (64%), White (83%), Hispanic (64%), and had a BMI < 30 kg/m2 (58%). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was utilized in 35% of patients. The reason for mastectomy was cancer in 64%, and axillary surgery was performed in 66% of cases. The mastectomy weight was ≥ 1000 grams in 41% of cases. Major complications occurred in 21% of cases: SSI in 12% (DTI 15% vs TE 9%), skin necrosis requiring reoperation in 11% (DTI 12% vs TE 10%), and reconstruction loss in 13% (DTI 15% vs TE 10%). SSI and skin necrosis requiring reoperation were associated with reconstruction loss (SSI, P ≤.001; skin necrosis, P ≤.001). Multivariable analysis showed that breast weight ≥ 1000 grams was associated with major complications (OR, 2.82; 95% CI 1.27-6.26; P = .011) and Hispanic ethnicity, current smoking, and DTI reconstruction were associated with any 30-day complication (Hispanic ethnicity: OR, 3.33; 95% CI 1.62-6.87; P = .001; current smoking: OR, 5.57; 95% CI 1.05-29.02; P = .044; DTI, OR, 2.40; 95% CI 1.31-4.40; P = .005).

Table. Patient Characteristics, Clinical Features, and Surgical Outcomes

Table. Patient Characteristics, Clinical Features, and Surgical Outcomes

Articles in this issue

53 Comparison of Surgical Complications With Direct-to-Implant vs Tissue Expander Reconstruction After Wise Pattern Skin-Sparing Mastectomy
53 Comparison of Surgical Complications With Direct-to-Implant vs Tissue Expander Reconstruction After Wise Pattern Skin-Sparing Mastectomy
54 The Treatment of Breast Cancer With Percutaneous Thermal Ablation: Results of the THERMAC Trial
54 The Treatment of Breast Cancer With Percutaneous Thermal Ablation: Results of the THERMAC Trial
55 Do Genetic Counseling and Testing Affect Rates of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Patients Without Clinically Actionable Mutations?
55 Do Genetic Counseling and Testing Affect Rates of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Patients Without Clinically Actionable Mutations?
56 Paternal vs Maternal Inheritance of a BRCA Mutation: Is There a Difference in Presentation and Stage of Breast Cancer at Diagnosis?
56 Paternal vs Maternal Inheritance of a BRCA Mutation: Is There a Difference in Presentation and Stage of Breast Cancer at Diagnosis?
57 Tumor Morphology Concordance in Multifocal/Multicentric Triple- Negative and HER2+ Breast Cancers
57 Tumor Morphology Concordance in Multifocal/Multicentric Triple- Negative and HER2+ Breast Cancers
59 Are Choosing Wisely Guidelines Applicable to Patients With a High Ki-67 Proliferation Index and Magee Equation Score?
59 Are Choosing Wisely Guidelines Applicable to Patients With a High Ki-67 Proliferation Index and Magee Equation Score?
60 Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in Patients With BRCA and Other Breast Cancer–Related Gene Mutations
60 Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in Patients With BRCA and Other Breast Cancer–Related Gene Mutations
61 Can the Use of Tumor Margin Markers for Intraoperative Specimen Radiographs Decrease the Rate of Margin Positivity During Breast Conservation Therapy?
61 Can the Use of Tumor Margin Markers for Intraoperative Specimen Radiographs Decrease the Rate of Margin Positivity During Breast Conservation Therapy?
63 Intraoperative Radiation and External Beam Radiation After Breast-Conserving Surgery in an Ethnic Minority Population: Patient Reported Outcomes Using BREAST-Q
63 Intraoperative Radiation and External Beam Radiation After Breast-Conserving Surgery in an Ethnic Minority Population: Patient Reported Outcomes Using BREAST-Q
64 A Prospective Study to Accurately Define the Nipple-Ward Margins in Patients Undergoing Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer
64 A Prospective Study to Accurately Define the Nipple-Ward Margins in Patients Undergoing Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer
65 The Outcomes of Nipple Sparing Goldilocks Mastectomy in a Primarily Overweight and Obese Population
65 The Outcomes of Nipple Sparing Goldilocks Mastectomy in a Primarily Overweight and Obese Population
67 Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM) for Intraoperative Histopathological Margin Assessment in Breast Conservation Surgery
67 Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM) for Intraoperative Histopathological Margin Assessment in Breast Conservation Surgery
68 Upper Extremity Disability Assessment Following Breast Cancer Surgery Using QuickDASH in an Ethnic Minority Population
68 Upper Extremity Disability Assessment Following Breast Cancer Surgery Using QuickDASH in an Ethnic Minority Population
70 Malignancy Upgrade Rates of Discordant Breast Lesions
70 Malignancy Upgrade Rates of Discordant Breast Lesions
71 Beyond the Surface: Suspicious Nipple Lesions
71 Beyond the Surface: Suspicious Nipple Lesions

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Multidisciplinary care can help ensure that treatment planning does not deviate from established guidelines for inflammatory breast cancer management.
Photographic and written documentation can help providers recognize inflammatory breast cancer symptoms across diverse populations.
The use of guideline-concordant care in breast cancer appears to be more common in White populations than Black populations.
Strict inclusion criteria may disproportionately exclude racial minority populations from participating in breast cancer trials.
Related Content