20 Impact of Ribociclib Dose Reduction on Efficacy in Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Early Breast

Publication
Article
Miami Breast Cancer Conference® Abstracts Supplement42nd Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference® - Abstracts
Volume 39
Issue 4
Pages: 11-12

20 Impact of Ribociclib Dose Reduction on Efficacy in Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Early Breast

20 Impact of Ribociclib Dose Reduction on Efficacy in Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Early Breast

Background

The NATALEE trial showed statistically significant and clinically meaningful invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) with ribociclib plus a nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) vs NSAI in patients with stage II/III hormone receptor–positive (HR+)/HER2-negative (HER2–) early breast cancer (EBC; HR, 0.715; 95% CI, 0.609-0.840; 4-year absolute benefit, 4.9%; median follow-up, 44.2 months). We present an exploratory analysis of efficacy in patients with and without dose reduction.

Materials and Methods

Men and pre- and postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2− EBC were randomized 1:1 to receive ribociclib (400 mg/day; 3 wks on/1 week off for 36 months) plus NSAI or NSAI alone. Key inclusion criteria were stage II/III disease (AJCC 8th edition); patients with node-negative stage IIA disease (T2N0) were required to have additional high-risk criteria (grade 2 with Ki-67 ≥ 20% or high genomic risk; or grade 3). Only 1 ribociclib dose reduction (400 mg/day to 200 mg/day) was allowed for the management of adverse effects (AEs). Relative dose intensity (RDI; actual cumulative dose per duration of exposure [adjusted for 3-weeks-on/1-week-off schedule] divided by planned dose intensity of 400 mg/day) was analyzed by grouping patients into low, medium, or high RDI tertiles and summarized using Kaplan Meier methods. A stratified Cox proportional hazards model was used to compare iDFS rates with ribociclib across tertiles. The data cutoff date was Apr 29, 2024 (median follow-up, 44.2 mo).

Results

Among 2526 patients who received treatment in the ribociclib plus NSAI arm, 27.2% had a ribociclib dose reduction, and 72.8% did not. The median time for the dose reduction was 3.3 months. The most common reason for dose reduction was an AE (23.0%); the most common AEs leading to dose reduction included neutropenia (14.0%), alanine aminotransferase increased (1.9%), and fatigue (1.0%). Baseline characteristics were balanced. Duration of ribociclib exposure was similar among patients with and without a dose reduction (median, 35.7 months in both groups). RDI did not impact iDFS rates. Patients with low, medium, and high RDI had similar iDFS rates.

Conclusion

This post hoc exploratory analysis of NATALEE demonstrated that iDFS benefit was maintained among patients who had a dose reduction of RIB and were not impacted by ribociclib RDI. These data suggest it may be possible to implement a dose reduction of ribociclib to 200 mg/day when needed to manage AEs without compromising efficacy for patients with HR+/HER2− EBC.

Articles in this issue

20 Impact of Ribociclib Dose Reduction on Efficacy in Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Early Breast
20 Impact of Ribociclib Dose Reduction on Efficacy in Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Early Breast
21 Distant Disease-Free Survival Across Key Subgroups From the Phase 3 NATALEE Trial of Ribociclib Plus a Nonsteroidal Aromatase Inhibitor in Patients With HR+/HER2− Early Breast Cancer
21 Distant Disease-Free Survival Across Key Subgroups From the Phase 3 NATALEE Trial of Ribociclib Plus a Nonsteroidal Aromatase Inhibitor in Patients With HR+/HER2− Early Breast Cancer
22 Efficacy and Safety of Ribociclib + Nonsteroidal Aromatase Inhibitor in Younger Patients With HR+/HER2− Early Breast Cancer in NATALEE
22 Efficacy and Safety of Ribociclib + Nonsteroidal Aromatase Inhibitor in Younger Patients With HR+/HER2− Early Breast Cancer in NATALEE
23 Clinical Outcomes in Patients With HR+/HER2− Early Breast Cancer By Prior Systemic Treatment: A Subgroup Analysis of the NATALEE Trial
23 Clinical Outcomes in Patients With HR+/HER2− Early Breast Cancer By Prior Systemic Treatment: A Subgroup Analysis of the NATALEE Trial
TPS 24 Phase Ib Dose-Finding Study of [177Lu]Lu-NeoB + Ribociclib + Fulvestrant in Patients With ER+/HER2− Advanced Breast Cancer With GRPR Expression With Early Relapse FromAdjuvant Endocrine Therapy or Progression on ET + CDK4/6i for ABC
TPS 24 Phase Ib Dose-Finding Study of [177Lu]Lu-NeoB + Ribociclib + Fulvestrant in Patients With ER+/HER2− Advanced Breast Cancer With GRPR Expression With Early Relapse FromAdjuvant Endocrine Therapy or Progression on ET + CDK4/6i for ABC
TPS 25 Phase 1/2 Study of the Novel Radioligand Therapy [177Lu]Lu-NeoB Plus Capecitabine in Patients With ER+/HER2− Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC) With GRPR Expression After Progression on Prior Endocrine Therapy Plus a CDK4/6 Inhibitor for ABC
TPS 25 Phase 1/2 Study of the Novel Radioligand Therapy [177Lu]Lu-NeoB Plus Capecitabine in Patients With ER+/HER2− Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC) With GRPR Expression After Progression on Prior Endocrine Therapy Plus a CDK4/6 Inhibitor for ABC
26 Risk of Recurrence in Real-World NATALEE- and monarchE-Eligible Populations of Patients With HR+/HER2− Early Breast Cancer in an Electronic Health Record-Derived Database
26 Risk of Recurrence in Real-World NATALEE- and monarchE-Eligible Populations of Patients With HR+/HER2− Early Breast Cancer in an Electronic Health Record-Derived Database
27 Elacestrant vs Standard of Care in ER+, HER2- Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer With ESR1-Mutated Tumors: ESR1 Allelic Frequencies and Clinical Activity From the Phase 3 EMERALD Trial
27 Elacestrant vs Standard of Care in ER+, HER2- Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer With ESR1-Mutated Tumors: ESR1 Allelic Frequencies and Clinical Activity From the Phase 3 EMERALD Trial
TPS 28 ELEGANT: Elacestrant VS Standard Endocrine Therapy in Women and Men With Node-Positive, Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative, Early Breast Cancer With High Risk of Recurrence in a Global, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Phase 3 Study
TPS 28 ELEGANT: Elacestrant VS Standard Endocrine Therapy in Women and Men With Node-Positive, Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative, Early Breast Cancer With High Risk of Recurrence in a Global, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Phase 3 Study
29 A Real-World Exploratory Analysis to Identify Disparities in Breast Cancer Tumor Biopsy Practice at Community Oncology Clinics in the United States
29 A Real-World Exploratory Analysis to Identify Disparities in Breast Cancer Tumor Biopsy Practice at Community Oncology Clinics in the United States
30 Imlunestrant, an Oral Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader, as Monotherapy and Combined With Abemaciclib, for Patients with ER+, HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer, Pretreated With Endocrine Therapy: Results of the Phase 3 EMBER-3 Trial
30 Imlunestrant, an Oral Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader, as Monotherapy and Combined With Abemaciclib, for Patients with ER+, HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer, Pretreated With Endocrine Therapy: Results of the Phase 3 EMBER-3 Trial
TPS 31 Real-World Sacituzumab Govitecan Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Second-Line or Later Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Leveraging Electronic Health Records and Manual Curation of a US Database
TPS 31 Real-World Sacituzumab Govitecan Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Second-Line or Later Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Leveraging Electronic Health Records and Manual Curation of a US Database
36 Expert Perspectives in the Management of Breast Cancer Brain Metastases: A Survey of 32 International Specialists
36 Expert Perspectives in the Management of Breast Cancer Brain Metastases: A Survey of 32 International Specialists
TPS 38 ELCIN: Elacestrant in Women and Men With CDK4/6 Inhibitor-Naive Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: An Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase 2 Study
TPS 38 ELCIN: Elacestrant in Women and Men With CDK4/6 Inhibitor-Naive Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: An Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase 2 Study
39 Development and Validation of a Questionnaire to Assess Motivation and Satisfaction in Mastectomy Patients With or Without Reconstruction
39 Development and Validation of a Questionnaire to Assess Motivation and Satisfaction in Mastectomy Patients With or Without Reconstruction

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Breast oncologist Jade E. Jones, MD, says she tries to send patients with BRCA-mutant HR-positive TNBC to clinical trials that use PARP inhibitors.
Following progression on a CDK4/6 inhibitor, ascertaining the endocrine sensitivity of HR-positive/HER2-negative disease may inform sequential treatment.
T-DXd improved progression-free survival over standard chemotherapy among patients with HR-positive/triple-negative breast cancer in DESTINY-Breast04.
The use of chemotherapy trended towards improved recurrence-free intervals in older patients with high-risk tumors as determined via the MammaPrint assay.
Use of a pharmacist-directed resource appears to improve provider confidence and adverse effect monitoring for patients undergoing infusion therapy.
Reshma L. Mahtani, DO, describes how updates from the DESTINY-Breast09, ASCENT-04, and VERITAC-2 trials may shift practices in the breast cancer field.
Multidisciplinary care can help ensure that treatment planning does not deviate from established guidelines for inflammatory breast cancer management.
Related Content