72 Breast Cancer After Breast Augmentation: A Multicenter Collaborative Study Of Patient Management and Outcomes

Publication
Article
Miami Breast Cancer Conference® Abstracts Supplement42nd Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference® - Abstracts
Volume 39
Issue 4
Pages: 80-81

72 Breast Cancer After Breast Augmentation: A Multicenter Collaborative Study Of Patient Management and Outcomes

72 Breast Cancer After Breast Augmentation: A Multicenter Collaborative Study Of Patient Management and Outcomes

Background/Significance

Breast augmentation is the most commonly performed cosmetic surgical procedure worldwide. Challenges to the management of breast cancer in this subgroup include management of native breast tissue, the implant, contralateral breast, the capsule, and the role of radiotherapy. Studies looking at breast conserving surgery, mastectomy, and reconstruction in this subgroup are limited. We aimed to assess current UK practice in managing breast cancer in this subgroup and to evaluate the safety and outcomes compared with national standards.

Materials and Methods

A national multicenter collaborative model was employed involving 24 UK units. Women diagnosed with invasive cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ from January 2012 to January 2024 with preexisting implant augmentation were included. Clinicopathological data collected included type of surgery, management of the implant and capsule, contralateral surgery, complications, and adjuvant treatments.

Results

Data was collected on 212 women (median age, 51 years; IQR, 44-58). A total of 177 (83.5%) patients presented symptomatically, while 30 (14.2%) were detected through breast screening. Of the patients, 143 (67.5%) underwent breast-conserving surgery, with 28 (19.6%) requiring further margin reexcision and 4 (2.8%) needing completion mastectomy. In the breast-conserving surgery group, 108 (75.5%) patients retained or exchanged their implants and 111 (77.6%) did not have manipulation of the implant capsule. Implant or capsule exchange/surgery was lower in patients with implants in the subpectoral plane. Ninety-three percent of breast-conserving surgery patients received adjuvant radiotherapy. Some 73 (34.4%) patients underwent mastectomy, of which 39 (53%) had reconstruction, predominantly implant-based (94%). Implant-related complications (infection, reoperation, implant loss) in the mastectomy groups were comparable or lower than in published national reconstruction audits.

Conclusion

This is the largest reported series of patients with breast cancer and prior cosmetic augmentation worldwide. Surgical management is diverse, with breast-conserving surgery and re-excision rates comparable to national standards but may be higher in patients with T2 tumors. In mastectomy patients, prior augmentation may be protective against complications such as implant loss. Prospective studies with long-term outcomes, including patient-reported outcome measures, are required to determine the optimal management for this subgroup of patients with breast cancer who still pose specific challenges.

Articles in this issue

20 Impact of Ribociclib Dose Reduction on Efficacy in Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Early Breast
20 Impact of Ribociclib Dose Reduction on Efficacy in Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Early Breast
21 Distant Disease-Free Survival Across Key Subgroups From the Phase 3 NATALEE Trial of Ribociclib Plus a Nonsteroidal Aromatase Inhibitor in Patients With HR+/HER2− Early Breast Cancer
21 Distant Disease-Free Survival Across Key Subgroups From the Phase 3 NATALEE Trial of Ribociclib Plus a Nonsteroidal Aromatase Inhibitor in Patients With HR+/HER2− Early Breast Cancer
22 Efficacy and Safety of Ribociclib + Nonsteroidal Aromatase Inhibitor in Younger Patients With HR+/HER2− Early Breast Cancer in NATALEE
22 Efficacy and Safety of Ribociclib + Nonsteroidal Aromatase Inhibitor in Younger Patients With HR+/HER2− Early Breast Cancer in NATALEE
23 Clinical Outcomes in Patients With HR+/HER2− Early Breast Cancer By Prior Systemic Treatment: A Subgroup Analysis of the NATALEE Trial
23 Clinical Outcomes in Patients With HR+/HER2− Early Breast Cancer By Prior Systemic Treatment: A Subgroup Analysis of the NATALEE Trial
TPS 24 Phase Ib Dose-Finding Study of [177Lu]Lu-NeoB + Ribociclib + Fulvestrant in Patients With ER+/HER2− Advanced Breast Cancer With GRPR Expression With Early Relapse FromAdjuvant Endocrine Therapy or Progression on ET + CDK4/6i for ABC
TPS 24 Phase Ib Dose-Finding Study of [177Lu]Lu-NeoB + Ribociclib + Fulvestrant in Patients With ER+/HER2− Advanced Breast Cancer With GRPR Expression With Early Relapse FromAdjuvant Endocrine Therapy or Progression on ET + CDK4/6i for ABC
TPS 25 Phase 1/2 Study of the Novel Radioligand Therapy [177Lu]Lu-NeoB Plus Capecitabine in Patients With ER+/HER2− Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC) With GRPR Expression After Progression on Prior Endocrine Therapy Plus a CDK4/6 Inhibitor for ABC
TPS 25 Phase 1/2 Study of the Novel Radioligand Therapy [177Lu]Lu-NeoB Plus Capecitabine in Patients With ER+/HER2− Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC) With GRPR Expression After Progression on Prior Endocrine Therapy Plus a CDK4/6 Inhibitor for ABC
26 Risk of Recurrence in Real-World NATALEE- and monarchE-Eligible Populations of Patients With HR+/HER2− Early Breast Cancer in an Electronic Health Record-Derived Database
26 Risk of Recurrence in Real-World NATALEE- and monarchE-Eligible Populations of Patients With HR+/HER2− Early Breast Cancer in an Electronic Health Record-Derived Database
27 Elacestrant vs Standard of Care in ER+, HER2- Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer With ESR1-Mutated Tumors: ESR1 Allelic Frequencies and Clinical Activity From the Phase 3 EMERALD Trial
27 Elacestrant vs Standard of Care in ER+, HER2- Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer With ESR1-Mutated Tumors: ESR1 Allelic Frequencies and Clinical Activity From the Phase 3 EMERALD Trial
TPS 28 ELEGANT: Elacestrant VS Standard Endocrine Therapy in Women and Men With Node-Positive, Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative, Early Breast Cancer With High Risk of Recurrence in a Global, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Phase 3 Study
TPS 28 ELEGANT: Elacestrant VS Standard Endocrine Therapy in Women and Men With Node-Positive, Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative, Early Breast Cancer With High Risk of Recurrence in a Global, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Phase 3 Study
29 A Real-World Exploratory Analysis to Identify Disparities in Breast Cancer Tumor Biopsy Practice at Community Oncology Clinics in the United States
29 A Real-World Exploratory Analysis to Identify Disparities in Breast Cancer Tumor Biopsy Practice at Community Oncology Clinics in the United States
30 Imlunestrant, an Oral Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader, as Monotherapy and Combined With Abemaciclib, for Patients with ER+, HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer, Pretreated With Endocrine Therapy: Results of the Phase 3 EMBER-3 Trial
30 Imlunestrant, an Oral Selective Estrogen Receptor Degrader, as Monotherapy and Combined With Abemaciclib, for Patients with ER+, HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer, Pretreated With Endocrine Therapy: Results of the Phase 3 EMBER-3 Trial
TPS 31 Real-World Sacituzumab Govitecan Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Second-Line or Later Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Leveraging Electronic Health Records and Manual Curation of a US Database
TPS 31 Real-World Sacituzumab Govitecan Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Second-Line or Later Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Leveraging Electronic Health Records and Manual Curation of a US Database
36 Expert Perspectives in the Management of Breast Cancer Brain Metastases: A Survey of 32 International Specialists
36 Expert Perspectives in the Management of Breast Cancer Brain Metastases: A Survey of 32 International Specialists
TPS 38 ELCIN: Elacestrant in Women and Men With CDK4/6 Inhibitor-Naive Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: An Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase 2 Study
TPS 38 ELCIN: Elacestrant in Women and Men With CDK4/6 Inhibitor-Naive Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: An Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase 2 Study
39 Development and Validation of a Questionnaire to Assess Motivation and Satisfaction in Mastectomy Patients With or Without Reconstruction
39 Development and Validation of a Questionnaire to Assess Motivation and Satisfaction in Mastectomy Patients With or Without Reconstruction

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
“If you have a [patient in the] fourth or fifth line, [JNJ-5322] could be a valid drug of choice,” said Rakesh Popat, BSc, MBBS, MRCP, FRCPath, PhD.
Earlier treatment with daratumumab may be better tolerated for patients with pretreated MRD-negative multiple myeloma.
The trispecific antibody JNJ-5322 demonstrated superior efficacy vs approved agents in multiple myeloma in results shared at the 2025 EHA Congress.
Despite CD19 CAR T-cell therapy exhibiting efficacy in patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma, less than half achieve long-term remission.
Current findings from the phase 1/2 CaDAnCe-101 trial show no predictive factors of improved responses with BGB-16673 in patients with CLL or SLL.
The phase 3 NIVOSTOP trial evaluated an anti–PD-1 immunotherapy, nivolumab, in a patient population similar in the KEYNOTE-689 trial.
Related Content