81 Assessing Recurrence Likelihood in Hormone Receptor–Positive/HER2-Negative Breast Cancer Patients Directly From MRI Using Imaging AI

Publication
Article
Miami Breast Cancer Conference® Abstracts Supplement42nd Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference® - Abstracts
Volume 39
Issue 4
Pages: 67

81 Assessing Recurrence Likelihood in Hormone Receptor–Positive/HER2-Negative Breast Cancer Patients Directly From MRI Using Imaging AI

81 Assessing Recurrence Likelihood in Hormone Receptor–Positive/HER2-Negative Breast Cancer Patients Directly From MRI Using Imaging AI

Background/Significance

Early-stage hormone receptor (HR)–positive, HER2-negative breast cancer is treated with endocrine therapy with or without chemotherapy. Commercially available genomic assays may not fully capture disease heterogeneity when performed on a single tissue block. Radiographic imaging with multi-modal AI allows for a global assessment of tumor heterogeneity. We developed and tested an AI-based model incorporating pretreatment dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI with clinicopathologic factors to predict recurrence risk in HR–positive/HER2-negative breast cancer.

Materials and Methods

A multi-institutional cohort of 1072 women diagnosed with invasive HR–positive/HER2-negative breast cancer who had follow-up and pretreatment DCE-MRI was identified. Institutions were assigned to either algorithm training or testing, resulting in datasets with 522 and 550 women, respectively. An AI risk model was developed that utilized clinicopathological data (age, race/ethnicity, T stage, N stage, grade) and image-based spatial features of the tumor and surrounding tissues derived from the DCE-MRI (Figure 1A, B). The risk model was calibrated on the training dataset to produce a score correlating with probability of loco-regional recurrence or distant recurrence (hereafter RP). High- and low-risk of recurrence categories were defined by optimizing a threshold in the training dataset. Finally, the risk model was assessed in the testing dataset using this threshold.

Results

In the test cohort, patients had a median follow-up time of 4.5 years, median age of 54 ± 11 years, and 15.6% were African American. The majority of women had T1-T2 disease (89.6%), and 34.4% had 1 to 3 involved lymph nodes. The 5-year RP for women predicted to be low-risk was 6.2% (95% CI, 3.8%-10.0%) compared with 17.4% (95% CI, 11.9%-25.2%) for women predicted to be high-risk (Figure 1C). The adjusted hazard ratio including clinicopathologic factors between low- and high-risk groups was 3.1 (95% CI, 1.7-5.8; P <.005). Similar hazard ratios between low- and high-risk were observed in important subgroups: node negative (3.6; 95% CI, 1.6-8.1), node positive (2.2; 95% CI, 0.8-5.9), age < 50 years (2.5; 95% CI, 1.0-6.2), and age > 50 years (2.9; 95% CI, 1.2-6.8).

Figure 1. A) AI model development includes whole-tumor imaging and clinicopathologic variables. B) Spatial characteristics correlate with recurrence risk. C) Results in the independent testing dataset.

Figure 1. A) AI model development includes whole-tumor imaging and clinicopathologic variables. B) Spatial characteristics correlate with recurrence risk. C) Results in the independent testing dataset.

Conclusion

Our AI-based prognostic tool incorporating imaging allows personalized treatment planning in real time in women with early-stage HR–positive/HER2-negative breast cancer. The prognostic benefit exceeded that of clinical features alone and was observed regardless of age and lymph node involvement.

Articles in this issue

61 Can the Use of Tumor Margin Markers for Intraoperative Specimen Radiographs Decrease the Rate of Margin Positivity During Breast Conservation Therapy?
61 Can the Use of Tumor Margin Markers for Intraoperative Specimen Radiographs Decrease the Rate of Margin Positivity During Breast Conservation Therapy?
63 Intraoperative Radiation and External Beam Radiation After Breast-Conserving Surgery in an Ethnic Minority Population: Patient Reported Outcomes Using BREAST-Q
63 Intraoperative Radiation and External Beam Radiation After Breast-Conserving Surgery in an Ethnic Minority Population: Patient Reported Outcomes Using BREAST-Q
64 A Prospective Study to Accurately Define the Nipple-Ward Margins in Patients Undergoing Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer
64 A Prospective Study to Accurately Define the Nipple-Ward Margins in Patients Undergoing Lumpectomy for Breast Cancer
65 The Outcomes of Nipple Sparing Goldilocks Mastectomy in a Primarily Overweight and Obese Population
65 The Outcomes of Nipple Sparing Goldilocks Mastectomy in a Primarily Overweight and Obese Population
67 Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM) for Intraoperative Histopathological Margin Assessment in Breast Conservation Surgery
67 Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM) for Intraoperative Histopathological Margin Assessment in Breast Conservation Surgery
68 Upper Extremity Disability Assessment Following Breast Cancer Surgery Using QuickDASH in an Ethnic Minority Population
68 Upper Extremity Disability Assessment Following Breast Cancer Surgery Using QuickDASH in an Ethnic Minority Population
70 Malignancy Upgrade Rates of Discordant Breast Lesions
70 Malignancy Upgrade Rates of Discordant Breast Lesions
71 Beyond the Surface: Suspicious Nipple Lesions
71 Beyond the Surface: Suspicious Nipple Lesions
72 Breast Cancer After Breast Augmentation: A Multicenter Collaborative Study Of Patient Management and Outcomes
72 Breast Cancer After Breast Augmentation: A Multicenter Collaborative Study Of Patient Management and Outcomes
73 Short- and Long-Term Outcomes in Use of Titanium-Coated Polypropylene Meshes in Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A Cost-Effective and Safe Option?
73 Short- and Long-Term Outcomes in Use of Titanium-Coated Polypropylene Meshes in Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A Cost-Effective and Safe Option?
74 Lessons Learned From a Breast Surgery ERAS Program in an Oncologic Ambulatory Center
74 Lessons Learned From a Breast Surgery ERAS Program in an Oncologic Ambulatory Center
75 Comparing 21-Gene Assay Recurrence Scores Before and After Preoperative Radiation Boost in Patients Enrolled in a Phase 2 Prospective Clinical Trial
75 Comparing 21-Gene Assay Recurrence Scores Before and After Preoperative Radiation Boost in Patients Enrolled in a Phase 2 Prospective Clinical Trial
76 Electromagnetic Chip Bracketed vs Wire Bracketed Localization in Breast Conserving Surgery
76 Electromagnetic Chip Bracketed vs Wire Bracketed Localization in Breast Conserving Surgery
77 A Radio Opaque Suture May Improve Radiation Target Delineation in Post Lumpectomy Patients With Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis
77 A Radio Opaque Suture May Improve Radiation Target Delineation in Post Lumpectomy Patients With Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis
78 Comparison of Positive Margin Rate of Breast Cancer in Higher BMI Patients
78 Comparison of Positive Margin Rate of Breast Cancer in Higher BMI Patients

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Prior studies, like the phase 3 VISION trial, may support the notion of combining radiopharmaceuticals with best supportive care.
Beta emitters like 177Lu-rosopatamab may offer built-in PSMA imaging during the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Ongoing ctDNA analysis may elucidate outcomes associated with divarasib plus migoprotafib for those with KRAS G12C–positive NSCLC.
Clinical trials conducted in recent years demonstrate the benefit of integrative oncology for patients undergoing treatment for cancer.
Multidisciplinary care can help ensure that treatment planning does not deviate from established guidelines for inflammatory breast cancer management.
Photographic and written documentation can help providers recognize inflammatory breast cancer symptoms across diverse populations.
The use of guideline-concordant care in breast cancer appears to be more common in White populations than Black populations.
Related Content