81 Assessing Recurrence Likelihood in Hormone Receptor–Positive/HER2-Negative Breast Cancer Patients Directly From MRI Using Imaging AI

Publication
Article
Miami Breast Cancer Conference® Abstracts Supplement42nd Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference® - Abstracts
Volume 39
Issue 4
Pages: 67

81 Assessing Recurrence Likelihood in Hormone Receptor–Positive/HER2-Negative Breast Cancer Patients Directly From MRI Using Imaging AI

81 Assessing Recurrence Likelihood in Hormone Receptor–Positive/HER2-Negative Breast Cancer Patients Directly From MRI Using Imaging AI

Background/Significance

Early-stage hormone receptor (HR)–positive, HER2-negative breast cancer is treated with endocrine therapy with or without chemotherapy. Commercially available genomic assays may not fully capture disease heterogeneity when performed on a single tissue block. Radiographic imaging with multi-modal AI allows for a global assessment of tumor heterogeneity. We developed and tested an AI-based model incorporating pretreatment dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI with clinicopathologic factors to predict recurrence risk in HR–positive/HER2-negative breast cancer.

Materials and Methods

A multi-institutional cohort of 1072 women diagnosed with invasive HR–positive/HER2-negative breast cancer who had follow-up and pretreatment DCE-MRI was identified. Institutions were assigned to either algorithm training or testing, resulting in datasets with 522 and 550 women, respectively. An AI risk model was developed that utilized clinicopathological data (age, race/ethnicity, T stage, N stage, grade) and image-based spatial features of the tumor and surrounding tissues derived from the DCE-MRI (Figure 1A, B). The risk model was calibrated on the training dataset to produce a score correlating with probability of loco-regional recurrence or distant recurrence (hereafter RP). High- and low-risk of recurrence categories were defined by optimizing a threshold in the training dataset. Finally, the risk model was assessed in the testing dataset using this threshold.

Results

In the test cohort, patients had a median follow-up time of 4.5 years, median age of 54 ± 11 years, and 15.6% were African American. The majority of women had T1-T2 disease (89.6%), and 34.4% had 1 to 3 involved lymph nodes. The 5-year RP for women predicted to be low-risk was 6.2% (95% CI, 3.8%-10.0%) compared with 17.4% (95% CI, 11.9%-25.2%) for women predicted to be high-risk (Figure 1C). The adjusted hazard ratio including clinicopathologic factors between low- and high-risk groups was 3.1 (95% CI, 1.7-5.8; P <.005). Similar hazard ratios between low- and high-risk were observed in important subgroups: node negative (3.6; 95% CI, 1.6-8.1), node positive (2.2; 95% CI, 0.8-5.9), age < 50 years (2.5; 95% CI, 1.0-6.2), and age > 50 years (2.9; 95% CI, 1.2-6.8).

Figure 1. A) AI model development includes whole-tumor imaging and clinicopathologic variables. B) Spatial characteristics correlate with recurrence risk. C) Results in the independent testing dataset.

Figure 1. A) AI model development includes whole-tumor imaging and clinicopathologic variables. B) Spatial characteristics correlate with recurrence risk. C) Results in the independent testing dataset.

Conclusion

Our AI-based prognostic tool incorporating imaging allows personalized treatment planning in real time in women with early-stage HR–positive/HER2-negative breast cancer. The prognostic benefit exceeded that of clinical features alone and was observed regardless of age and lymph node involvement.

Articles in this issue

TPS 38 ELCIN: Elacestrant in Women and Men With CDK4/6 Inhibitor-Naive Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: An Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase 2 Study
TPS 38 ELCIN: Elacestrant in Women and Men With CDK4/6 Inhibitor-Naive Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer: An Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase 2 Study
39 Development and Validation of a Questionnaire to Assess Motivation and Satisfaction in Mastectomy Patients With or Without Reconstruction
39 Development and Validation of a Questionnaire to Assess Motivation and Satisfaction in Mastectomy Patients With or Without Reconstruction
40 Frequency of Documented IHC Score in Patients With HER2-Negative Breast Cancer in the US: An Observational Study Using Guardian Research Network Data
40 Frequency of Documented IHC Score in Patients With HER2-Negative Breast Cancer in the US: An Observational Study Using Guardian Research Network Data
41 Provider Preferences and Practices in Testing and Reporting HER2 Immunohistochemistry in Patients With Breast Cancer: A Survey and Interview Study Among US Pathologists and Oncologists
41 Provider Preferences and Practices in Testing and Reporting HER2 Immunohistochemistry in Patients With Breast Cancer: A Survey and Interview Study Among US Pathologists and Oncologists
42 Exploring the Treatment Gap in High-Risk HR+, HER2– Early Breast Cancer: Eligible Patients Not Receiving Abemaciclib in the US
42 Exploring the Treatment Gap in High-Risk HR+, HER2– Early Breast Cancer: Eligible Patients Not Receiving Abemaciclib in the US
TPS 43 ADELA: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Phase 3 Trial of Elacestrant + Everolimus vs Elacestrant + Placebo in ER+/HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With ESR1-Mutated Tumors Progressing on Endocrine Therapy
TPS 43 ADELA: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Phase 3 Trial of Elacestrant + Everolimus vs Elacestrant + Placebo in ER+/HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With ESR1-Mutated Tumors Progressing on Endocrine Therapy
45 A Phase 3 Randomized Study of Adjuvant Sacituzumab Tirumotecan Plus Pembrolizumab vs Treatment of Physician’s Choice in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Who Received Neoadjuvant Therapy and Did Not Achieve a Pathological Complete Response at Surgery
45 A Phase 3 Randomized Study of Adjuvant Sacituzumab Tirumotecan Plus Pembrolizumab vs Treatment of Physician’s Choice in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Who Received Neoadjuvant Therapy and Did Not Achieve a Pathological Complete Response at Surgery
46 Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Chemotherapy Followed by Adjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo for High-Risk, Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Overall Survival and Subgroup Results From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-522 Study
46 Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Chemotherapy Followed by Adjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo for High-Risk, Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Overall Survival and Subgroup Results From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-522 Study
48 Prevalence of “HER2 Ultra-Low” Among Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With Historical IHC0 Status
48 Prevalence of “HER2 Ultra-Low” Among Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With Historical IHC0 Status
49 Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Persistence in US Patients With HR+/HER2–, Node-Positive Early Breast Cancer Treated With Abemaciclib: Real-World Study From First Year After Approval
49 Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Persistence in US Patients With HR+/HER2–, Node-Positive Early Breast Cancer Treated With Abemaciclib: Real-World Study From First Year After Approval
52 Correlation and Prediction of Complete Pathologic Response Rates and Ki-67 in Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
52 Correlation and Prediction of Complete Pathologic Response Rates and Ki-67 in Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
53 Comparison of Surgical Complications With Direct-to-Implant vs Tissue Expander Reconstruction After Wise Pattern Skin-Sparing Mastectomy
53 Comparison of Surgical Complications With Direct-to-Implant vs Tissue Expander Reconstruction After Wise Pattern Skin-Sparing Mastectomy
54 The Treatment of Breast Cancer With Percutaneous Thermal Ablation: Results of the THERMAC Trial
54 The Treatment of Breast Cancer With Percutaneous Thermal Ablation: Results of the THERMAC Trial
55 Do Genetic Counseling and Testing Affect Rates of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Patients Without Clinically Actionable Mutations?
55 Do Genetic Counseling and Testing Affect Rates of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Patients Without Clinically Actionable Mutations?
56 Paternal vs Maternal Inheritance of a BRCA Mutation: Is There a Difference in Presentation and Stage of Breast Cancer at Diagnosis?
56 Paternal vs Maternal Inheritance of a BRCA Mutation: Is There a Difference in Presentation and Stage of Breast Cancer at Diagnosis?

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
The phase 3 NIVOSTOP trial evaluated an anti–PD-1 immunotherapy, nivolumab, in a patient population similar in the KEYNOTE-689 trial.
Opportunities to further reduce relapses include pembrolizumab-based combination therapy and evaluating the agent’s contribution before and after surgery.
For patients with locally advanced head and neck cancers, the current standard of care for curative therapy has a cure rate of less than 50%.
According to Maurie Markman, MD, patient-reported outcomes pertain to more relevant questions surrounding the impact of therapy for patients.
Future findings from a translational analysis of the OVATION-2 trial may corroborate prior clinical data with IMNN-001 in advanced ovarian cancer.
Related Content