96 Elacestrant Real-World Progression-Free Survival of Adult Patients With ER+/HER2–, Advanced Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis Using Insurance Claims in the United States

Publication
Article
Miami Breast Cancer Conference® Abstracts Supplement42nd Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference® - Abstracts
Volume 39
Issue 4
Pages: 39-40

96 Elacestrant Real-World Progression-Free Survival of Adult Patients With ER+/HER2–, Advanced Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis Using Insurance Claims in the United States

96 Elacestrant Real-World Progression-Free Survival of Adult Patients With ER+/HER2–, Advanced Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis Using Insurance Claims in the United States

Background

Endocrine therapy (ET) plus CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) is the standard-of-care (SOC) for first-line estrogen receptor–positive/HER2-negative (ER+/HER2–) advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Sequential ET monotherapy or combinations are used second line post-ET plus CDK4/6i. Combination regimens in second-line or late metastatic breast cancer can be associated with significant toxicities and high discontinuation rates. ESR1 mutations, a type of acquired resistance, eventually emerge in up to 50% of patients after first-line treatment for ER+/HER2– metastatic breast cancer. In the phase 3 EMERALD trial (NCT03778931), patients with ESR1-mutated tumors had a 45% reduction in risk of progression or death with elacestrant vs SOC ET (median progression-free survival [PFS] 3.8 months vs 1.9 months; HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.39-0.77; P = .0005). In patients with 12 months or more prior ET plus CDK4/6i, the median PFS with elacestrant was 8.6 months vs 1.9 months with SOC ET (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.26-0.63). Elacestrant was FDA-approved in January 2023 for the treatment of postmenopausal ER+/HER2– ESR1-mutated metastatic breast cancer with progression after at least one line of ET. Sufficient time has passed since approval to characterize the real-world use of elacestrant in the current treatment landscape. This study aims to describe the real-world PFS of elacestrant overall and in patients with no prior exposure to fulvestrant, only 1 to 2 lines of ET, 3 or more lines of ET, and/or visceral metastases.

Materials and Methods

Adults with diagnosed ER+/HER2– metastatic breast cancer who initiated elacestrant in a real-world setting between January 2023 and May 2024 were identified in the Komodo Research Database. Demographic information described at index date (time of first administration of elacestrant) included metastatic sites identified during the 6-month baseline period prior to index date and prior metastatic breast cancer treatments. Real-world PFS was defined as time from index date until earliest outcome (start of next line of metastatic breast cancer therapy to progression or death). Patients were censored at first occurrence of end of data availability or end of health plan enrollment.

Results

A total of 276 patients treated were evaluated (median age 63 years, 86% visceral metastases, 90% prior CDK4/6i, 61% prior fulvestrant). Real-world PFS was prolonged with elacestrant in patients with prior fulvestrant and in the overall population in all subgroups (Table).

Table. Real-World Median Progression-Free Survival

Table. Real-World Median Progression-Free Survival

Conclusion

In a real-world setting, elacestrant showed a consistent real-world PFS benefit among all patients with ER+/HER2– metastatic breast cancer and across clinically relevant subgroups. The real-world PFS with elacestrant exceeded the overall median PFS in EMERALD and is longer when patients are treated in earlier lines.

Articles in this issue

TPS 89 A Randomized Phase 3 Study of First-Line Saruparib (AZD5305) Plus Camizestrant Versus CDK4/6i Plus Physician’s Choice Endocrine Therapy or CDK4/6i Plus Camizestrant in Patients With HR+/HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer With BRCA1/BRCA2/PALB2 Mutations (EvoPAR-B)
TPS 89 A Randomized Phase 3 Study of First-Line Saruparib (AZD5305) Plus Camizestrant Versus CDK4/6i Plus Physician’s Choice Endocrine Therapy or CDK4/6i Plus Camizestrant in Patients With HR+/HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer With BRCA1/BRCA2/PALB2 Mutations (EvoPAR-B)
90 Contralateral Risk Reduction Mastectomy in Patients With Unilateral Breast Cancer: A Multinational and Multidisciplinary Survey—Physicians’ Perspective
90 Contralateral Risk Reduction Mastectomy in Patients With Unilateral Breast Cancer: A Multinational and Multidisciplinary Survey—Physicians’ Perspective
91 Adverse Effects and Financial Burden of Radiation Therapy in Patients With T3N0M0 Luminal Breast Cancer
91 Adverse Effects and Financial Burden of Radiation Therapy in Patients With T3N0M0 Luminal Breast Cancer
92 Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging With Indocyanine Green vs Isosulfan Blue for Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping: Comparative Cost Analysis in Early-Stage Breast Cancer
92 Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging With Indocyanine Green vs Isosulfan Blue for Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping: Comparative Cost Analysis in Early-Stage Breast Cancer
96 Elacestrant Real-World Progression-Free Survival of Adult Patients With ER+/HER2–, Advanced Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis Using Insurance Claims in the United States
96 Elacestrant Real-World Progression-Free Survival of Adult Patients With ER+/HER2–, Advanced Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis Using Insurance Claims in the United States
97 Treatment Discontinuation Among Patients With Stage IV HER2–Negative Breast Cancer
97 Treatment Discontinuation Among Patients With Stage IV HER2–Negative Breast Cancer
TPS 99 Phase 3, Randomized, Open-Label TroFuse-010 Study of Sacituzumab Tirumotecan Alone and With Pembrolizumab Versus Treatment of Physician’s Choice Chemotherapy in Patients With HR+/HER2– Unresectable Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer
TPS 99 Phase 3, Randomized, Open-Label TroFuse-010 Study of Sacituzumab Tirumotecan Alone and With Pembrolizumab Versus Treatment of Physician’s Choice Chemotherapy in Patients With HR+/HER2– Unresectable Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer
100 Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Managing Abemaciclib-Associated Adverse Events in Patients With Early/Advanced HR+/HER2– Breast Cancer: A US-Based Health Care Provider Survey
100 Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Managing Abemaciclib-Associated Adverse Events in Patients With Early/Advanced HR+/HER2– Breast Cancer: A US-Based Health Care Provider Survey
102 Novel Prognostic and Predictive Locoregional Biosignature for Risk Stratification of Early-Stage Hormone Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer
102 Novel Prognostic and Predictive Locoregional Biosignature for Risk Stratification of Early-Stage Hormone Receptor–Positive Breast Cancer
103 Leveraging Digital Technology to Improve Breast Cancer Patients’ Understanding of Treatment Recommendations
103 Leveraging Digital Technology to Improve Breast Cancer Patients’ Understanding of Treatment Recommendations
104 Identification of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Patients With Low-Risk Clinicopathology Who Benefit From Radiation Therapy With and Without Endocrine Therapy After Breast-Conserving Surgery Assessed With the 7-Gene Biosignature
104 Identification of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Patients With Low-Risk Clinicopathology Who Benefit From Radiation Therapy With and Without Endocrine Therapy After Breast-Conserving Surgery Assessed With the 7-Gene Biosignature
TPS 105 ALISertib in Combination With Endocrine Therapy in Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer: the Phase 2 ALISCA-Breast1 Study
TPS 105 ALISertib in Combination With Endocrine Therapy in Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer: the Phase 2 ALISCA-Breast1 Study
106 Extended Adjuvant Neratinib in HER2+/HR+ Early Breast Cancer in Clinical Routine: Interim Analysis of the Multinational, Prospective, Noninterventional Study ELEANOR (N=300)
106 Extended Adjuvant Neratinib in HER2+/HR+ Early Breast Cancer in Clinical Routine: Interim Analysis of the Multinational, Prospective, Noninterventional Study ELEANOR (N=300)
107 Neratinib-Based Combination Treatments for Patients With HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Brain Metastases
107 Neratinib-Based Combination Treatments for Patients With HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Brain Metastases

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Photographic and written documentation can help providers recognize inflammatory breast cancer symptoms across diverse populations.
The use of guideline-concordant care in breast cancer appears to be more common in White populations than Black populations.
Strict inclusion criteria may disproportionately exclude racial minority populations from participating in breast cancer trials.
Spatial transcriptomics and multiplex immunohistochemistry from samples may elucidate outcomes for patients who undergo surgical care for cancer.
Future work may focus on optimizing symptom management associated with percutaneous transesophageal gastrostomy placement in malignant bowel obstructions.
Post-operative length of stay ranged from 4 to 9 days for patients who underwent percutaneous transesophageal gastrostomy for malignant bowel obstructions.
Future research will aim to assess the efficacy of PIPAC-MMC plus systemic therapy vs systemic therapy alone in patients with peritoneal tumors.
Although small incision surgery may serve as a conduit to deliver PIPAC-MMC, it may confer benefits in the staging and treatment of peritoneal tumors.
Patients with peritoneal metastases were historically associated with limited survival and low consideration for clinical trials.
Related Content