96 Elacestrant Real-World Progression-Free Survival of Adult Patients With ER+/HER2–, Advanced Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis Using Insurance Claims in the United States

Publication
Article
Miami Breast Cancer Conference® Abstracts Supplement42nd Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference® - Abstracts
Volume 39
Issue 4
Pages: 39-40

96 Elacestrant Real-World Progression-Free Survival of Adult Patients With ER+/HER2–, Advanced Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis Using Insurance Claims in the United States

96 Elacestrant Real-World Progression-Free Survival of Adult Patients With ER+/HER2–, Advanced Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis Using Insurance Claims in the United States

Background

Endocrine therapy (ET) plus CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) is the standard-of-care (SOC) for first-line estrogen receptor–positive/HER2-negative (ER+/HER2–) advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Sequential ET monotherapy or combinations are used second line post-ET plus CDK4/6i. Combination regimens in second-line or late metastatic breast cancer can be associated with significant toxicities and high discontinuation rates. ESR1 mutations, a type of acquired resistance, eventually emerge in up to 50% of patients after first-line treatment for ER+/HER2– metastatic breast cancer. In the phase 3 EMERALD trial (NCT03778931), patients with ESR1-mutated tumors had a 45% reduction in risk of progression or death with elacestrant vs SOC ET (median progression-free survival [PFS] 3.8 months vs 1.9 months; HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.39-0.77; P = .0005). In patients with 12 months or more prior ET plus CDK4/6i, the median PFS with elacestrant was 8.6 months vs 1.9 months with SOC ET (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.26-0.63). Elacestrant was FDA-approved in January 2023 for the treatment of postmenopausal ER+/HER2– ESR1-mutated metastatic breast cancer with progression after at least one line of ET. Sufficient time has passed since approval to characterize the real-world use of elacestrant in the current treatment landscape. This study aims to describe the real-world PFS of elacestrant overall and in patients with no prior exposure to fulvestrant, only 1 to 2 lines of ET, 3 or more lines of ET, and/or visceral metastases.

Materials and Methods

Adults with diagnosed ER+/HER2– metastatic breast cancer who initiated elacestrant in a real-world setting between January 2023 and May 2024 were identified in the Komodo Research Database. Demographic information described at index date (time of first administration of elacestrant) included metastatic sites identified during the 6-month baseline period prior to index date and prior metastatic breast cancer treatments. Real-world PFS was defined as time from index date until earliest outcome (start of next line of metastatic breast cancer therapy to progression or death). Patients were censored at first occurrence of end of data availability or end of health plan enrollment.

Results

A total of 276 patients treated were evaluated (median age 63 years, 86% visceral metastases, 90% prior CDK4/6i, 61% prior fulvestrant). Real-world PFS was prolonged with elacestrant in patients with prior fulvestrant and in the overall population in all subgroups (Table).

Table. Real-World Median Progression-Free Survival

Table. Real-World Median Progression-Free Survival

Conclusion

In a real-world setting, elacestrant showed a consistent real-world PFS benefit among all patients with ER+/HER2– metastatic breast cancer and across clinically relevant subgroups. The real-world PFS with elacestrant exceeded the overall median PFS in EMERALD and is longer when patients are treated in earlier lines.

Articles in this issue

39 Development and Validation of a Questionnaire to Assess Motivation and Satisfaction in Mastectomy Patients With or Without Reconstruction
39 Development and Validation of a Questionnaire to Assess Motivation and Satisfaction in Mastectomy Patients With or Without Reconstruction
40 Frequency of Documented IHC Score in Patients With HER2-Negative Breast Cancer in the US: An Observational Study Using Guardian Research Network Data
40 Frequency of Documented IHC Score in Patients With HER2-Negative Breast Cancer in the US: An Observational Study Using Guardian Research Network Data
41 Provider Preferences and Practices in Testing and Reporting HER2 Immunohistochemistry in Patients With Breast Cancer: A Survey and Interview Study Among US Pathologists and Oncologists
41 Provider Preferences and Practices in Testing and Reporting HER2 Immunohistochemistry in Patients With Breast Cancer: A Survey and Interview Study Among US Pathologists and Oncologists
42 Exploring the Treatment Gap in High-Risk HR+, HER2– Early Breast Cancer: Eligible Patients Not Receiving Abemaciclib in the US
42 Exploring the Treatment Gap in High-Risk HR+, HER2– Early Breast Cancer: Eligible Patients Not Receiving Abemaciclib in the US
TPS 43 ADELA: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Phase 3 Trial of Elacestrant + Everolimus vs Elacestrant + Placebo in ER+/HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With ESR1-Mutated Tumors Progressing on Endocrine Therapy
TPS 43 ADELA: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Phase 3 Trial of Elacestrant + Everolimus vs Elacestrant + Placebo in ER+/HER2– Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With ESR1-Mutated Tumors Progressing on Endocrine Therapy
45 A Phase 3 Randomized Study of Adjuvant Sacituzumab Tirumotecan Plus Pembrolizumab vs Treatment of Physician’s Choice in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Who Received Neoadjuvant Therapy and Did Not Achieve a Pathological Complete Response at Surgery
45 A Phase 3 Randomized Study of Adjuvant Sacituzumab Tirumotecan Plus Pembrolizumab vs Treatment of Physician’s Choice in Patients With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Who Received Neoadjuvant Therapy and Did Not Achieve a Pathological Complete Response at Surgery
46 Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Chemotherapy Followed by Adjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo for High-Risk, Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Overall Survival and Subgroup Results From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-522 Study
46 Neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Chemotherapy Followed by Adjuvant Pembrolizumab or Placebo for High-Risk, Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Overall Survival and Subgroup Results From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-522 Study
48 Prevalence of “HER2 Ultra-Low” Among Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With Historical IHC0 Status
48 Prevalence of “HER2 Ultra-Low” Among Advanced Breast Cancer Patients With Historical IHC0 Status
49 Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Persistence in US Patients With HR+/HER2–, Node-Positive Early Breast Cancer Treated With Abemaciclib: Real-World Study From First Year After Approval
49 Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Persistence in US Patients With HR+/HER2–, Node-Positive Early Breast Cancer Treated With Abemaciclib: Real-World Study From First Year After Approval
52 Correlation and Prediction of Complete Pathologic Response Rates and Ki-67 in Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
52 Correlation and Prediction of Complete Pathologic Response Rates and Ki-67 in Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
53 Comparison of Surgical Complications With Direct-to-Implant vs Tissue Expander Reconstruction After Wise Pattern Skin-Sparing Mastectomy
53 Comparison of Surgical Complications With Direct-to-Implant vs Tissue Expander Reconstruction After Wise Pattern Skin-Sparing Mastectomy
54 The Treatment of Breast Cancer With Percutaneous Thermal Ablation: Results of the THERMAC Trial
54 The Treatment of Breast Cancer With Percutaneous Thermal Ablation: Results of the THERMAC Trial
55 Do Genetic Counseling and Testing Affect Rates of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Patients Without Clinically Actionable Mutations?
55 Do Genetic Counseling and Testing Affect Rates of Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Patients Without Clinically Actionable Mutations?
56 Paternal vs Maternal Inheritance of a BRCA Mutation: Is There a Difference in Presentation and Stage of Breast Cancer at Diagnosis?
56 Paternal vs Maternal Inheritance of a BRCA Mutation: Is There a Difference in Presentation and Stage of Breast Cancer at Diagnosis?
57 Tumor Morphology Concordance in Multifocal/Multicentric Triple- Negative and HER2+ Breast Cancers
57 Tumor Morphology Concordance in Multifocal/Multicentric Triple- Negative and HER2+ Breast Cancers

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Future findings from a translational analysis of the OVATION-2 trial may corroborate prior clinical data with IMNN-001 in advanced ovarian cancer.
The dual high-affinity binding observed with ISB 2001 may avoid resistance mechanisms reported with other BCMA-targeted therapies.
The use of chemotherapy trended towards improved recurrence-free intervals in older patients with high-risk tumors as determined via the MammaPrint assay.
Use of a pharmacist-directed resource appears to improve provider confidence and adverse effect monitoring for patients undergoing infusion therapy.
Reshma L. Mahtani, DO, describes how updates from the DESTINY-Breast09, ASCENT-04, and VERITAC-2 trials may shift practices in the breast cancer field.
Co-hosts Kristie L. Kahl and Andrew Svonavec highlight what to look forward to at the 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting, from hot topics and emerging trends to travel recommendations.
Related Content