ABBV-400 Shows Early Promise in Pretreated, Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

News
Video

“It does appear like MET expression could be one of the mechanisms wherein you could differentiate between responders and non-responders,” Kanwal P.S. Raghav, MBBS, MD, stated.

Kanwal P.S. Raghav, MBBS, MD, spoke with CancerNetwork® at the 2025 Gastrointestinal Cancer Symposium following his presentation on a phase 2 trial (NCT06107413) evaluating ABBV-400 with fluorouracil, folinic acid, and bevacizumab (Avastin) in patients who were pretreated and had metastatic colorectal cancer.

Raghav, an associate professor in the Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine and clinical medical director in the Division of Ambulatory Treatment Centers at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, spoke about how bevacizumab was largely chosen because it elicits VEGF-inhibition in colorectal cancer and that fluorouracil was chosen because of its conduciveness to additive vaccines.

Additionally, when prompted about specific patient populations that this study treatment might have increased benefit for, Raghav noted that it's still early for the phase 2 trial to know, or have data, on specific patient subgroups. There is, however, another phase 1 study (NCT05029882) evaluating ABBV-400 in advanced solid tumors both as a monotherapy and in combination with bevacizumab that offers the possibility that MET expression might be able to signify who may or may not respond to the study treatment.

Transcript:

[For] bevacizumab, VEGF inhibition with bevacizumab continuing in colorectal cancer, has been shown previously to be effective, and therefore it is a very logical partner. There have been additive [vaccines] with [fluorouracil] and irinotecan, and that’s the rationale for combining these drugs.

[Regarding patient subgroups] I don’t think, [so far], from this study, we have any such data, but from our third-line study, with some of the data that was already presented, it does appear like MET expression could be one of the mechanisms wherein you could differentiate between responders and non-responders.

Reference

Raghav K, Hubert A, Fakih M, et al. Phase 2 randomized study evaluating safety, efficacy, and optimal dose of ABBV-400 in combination with fluorouracil, folinic acid, and bevacizumab in previously treated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2025;43(4):TPS308. doi:10.1200/JCO.2025.43.4_suppl.TPS308

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
An ongoing phase 1 trial seeks to prove XmAb819 as an effective treatment and ENPP3 as a plausible target in patients with relapsed or refractory RCC.
“The therapy is designed to prevent both CAR T-cell inactivation and to restore the anti-tumor immunity of the white blood cells that have gotten through the tumor,” said Marasco, MD, PhD.
Ongoing studies aim to combine base immunotherapy regimens with novel agents to potentially improve outcomes among patients with kidney cancer.
Investigators have found a way to reduce liver and biliary toxicity when targeting the molecule CAIX in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Neoantigen-targeting vaccines resulted in an absence of recurrence in 9 patients with high-risk kidney cancer, according to David A. Braun, MD, PhD.
The Kidney Cancer Research Consortium may allow collaborators to form more mechanistic and scientifically driven efforts in the field.
Wayne A. Marasco, MD, PhD, stated that by targeting 2 molecules instead of 1, higher levels of tumor cell killing can be achieved in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Leading experts in the breast cancer field highlight the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, and other treatment modalities.
Related Content