Abemaciclib Improves Response, PFS in Endocrine-Resistant Breast Cancer

Article

Abemaciclib plus fulvestrant was linked with improved response and PFS in patients with endocrine-resistant, HR-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.

CHICAGO-Adding abemaciclib to fulvestrant was associated with an improved objective response rate (ORR) and a 7-month improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) compared with placebo among patients with endocrine-resistant, HR-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer, according to findings from the multicenter, double-blind, randomized, phase III MONARCH 2 trial (abstract 1000), presented at the 2017 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, held June 2–6. The findings were also published online as a rapid communication in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Abemaciclib with fulvestrant was “an effective treatment for women with HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who progressed on endocrine therapy,” reported lead study author George W. Sledge, Jr, MD, of the Stanford University School of Medicine in Stanford, California.

Abemaciclib is an oral selective cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4 and CDK6 inhibitor that has received US Food and Drug Administration Breakthrough Therapy Designation for refractory metastatic breast cancer based on phase I monotherapy trial findings. CDK4&6 inhibition leads to reversible tumor cell G1 arrest. Continuous CDK4&6 inhibition causes sustained tumor cell cycle arrest, potentially triggering apoptosis.

The study authors randomly assigned 669 study participants 2:1 to receive fulvestrant plus either placebo (n = 223) or abemaciclib (150 mg twice daily or 200 mg twice daily prior to study amendment; n = 446). Premenopausal and perimenopausal women were administered a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist.

At a follow-up of 19.5 months, median PFS was 16.4 months for patients in the abemaciclib group and 9.3 months for the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.553; 95% CI, 0.449–0.681; P < .0000001).

“In patients with measurable disease, the ORR was 48.1% (3.5% complete response) for abemaciclib plus fulvestrant and 21.3% (0% complete response) for placebo plus fulvestrant,” Sledge said.

Treatment-emergent adverse events for abemaciclib plus fulvestrant were near universal and included diarrhea (86% vs 25% for the placebo group), neutropenia (46% vs 4%), nausea (45.1% vs 22.9%), and fatigue (39.9% vs 26.9%). The grade 3/4 neutropenia rate was 26.5% on abemaciclib, Sledge noted. “Diarrhea typically occurred early and was readily managed with dose adjustment and antidiarrheal medication.”

Based on the findings, abemaciclib and endocrine therapy will be studied as an adjuvant therapy for women with high-risk HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer in the monarchE study, which will begin recruiting patients late this year.

Recent Videos
Whole or accelerated partial breast ultra-hypofractionated radiation in older patients with early breast cancer may reduce recurrence with low toxicity.
Ultra-hypofractionated radiation in those 65 years or older with early breast cancer yielded no ipsilateral recurrence after a 10-month follow-up.
The unclear role of hypofractionated radiation in older patients with early breast cancer in prior trials incentivized research for this group.
Patients with HR-positive, HER2-positive breast cancer and high-risk features may derive benefit from ovarian function suppression plus endocrine therapy.
Paolo Tarantino, MD discusses updated breast cancer trial findings presented at ESMO 2024 supporting the use of agents such as T-DXd and ribociclib.
Paolo Tarantino, MD, discusses the potential utility of agents such as datopotamab deruxtecan and enfortumab vedotin in patients with breast cancer.
Paolo Tarantino, MD, highlights strategies related to screening and multidisciplinary collaboration for managing ILD in patients who receive T-DXd.