Addressing Limitations to Clinical Trial Development for Lymphoma Treatment

Commentary
Video

Retrospective and real-world registry studies may be necessary to guide clinical decision-making for rarer lymphomas with insufficient prospective data.

In an interview with CancerNetwork®, Neha Mehta-Shah, MD, MSCI, associate professor in the John T. Milliken Department of Medicine in the Division of Oncology at the Washington University Medical School in St Louis, Missouri, discussed challenges related to developing clinical trials to treat rarer lymphoma subtypes.

She began by explaining that rare lymphomas are often lumped together to better understand and categorize them when conducting clinical trials. Citing marginal zone lymphoma as an example, Mehta-Shah expressed that although marginal zone lymphoma consists of numerous disease subtypes that have different biological drivers and different propensities to affect disparate areas of the body, they all end up being lumped into a single cohort within clinical trials.

Furthermore, she remarked that to effectively understand the impact of a therapy on a particular disease subtype, subgroup analyses have to be conducted. These subgroup analyses end up representing a small sample of patients, which can present concerns when treating patients with a rare disease subtype.

Mehta-Shah concluded by suggesting that retrospective studies and real-world registry studies may be necessary to guide clinical decision-making or develop national guidelines, despite less reliance on these types of studies in other areas of medicine.

Transcript:

Sometimes we have these rare lymphomas, and in order to better understand them and categorize them, [they] are put together in 1 category, but they usually encompass more than 1 type of disease. Marginal zone lymphoma is a perfect example of that, where patients can have marginal zone lymphoma but there are multiple subtypes of marginal zone lymphoma: primary cutaneous marginal zone lymphoma, splenic marginal zone lymphoma, nodal marginal zone lymphoma, or mucosal-associated marginal zone lymphoma.

These are fundamentally different diseases. They have different biological drivers. They have a different propensity to affect different areas of the body, and we treat these differently. Because marginal zone lymphomas are rare, most studies in marginal zone lymphoma encompass all these subtypes. Helping a patient understand how a particular drug or therapy is going to work for them relies on us to then look at those data specific to that patient and do a subgroup analysis. Usually, those numbers get small in helping to understand the likelihood of response or the duration of response for a particular patient.

While we do not rely on retrospective studies in all areas of medicine to inform our practice in rare diseases, sometimes retrospective studies...[or] real-world registry type of studies may be the best type of information we have to help guide our clinical decision-making or inform the development of national guidelines.

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Extravasation with beta emitters may elicit more drastic adverse effects due to their higher radiation dose.
Increasing the use of patient-reported outcomes may ensure that practitioners can fully ascertain the impact of treatment for rare lymphomas.
Photographic and written documentation can help providers recognize inflammatory breast cancer symptoms across diverse populations.
The use of guideline-concordant care in breast cancer appears to be more common in White populations than Black populations.
Extravasation results in exposing healthy tissue to radiation, which can be highly dosed depending on the isotope used for treatment.
Ongoing studies seek to evaluate immunotherapy in earlier lines of therapy for patients with early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma.
Strict inclusion criteria may disproportionately exclude racial minority populations from participating in breast cancer trials.
A paucity of prospective, well-vetted data to guide therapy in patients with rare lymphomas may result in a reliance on expert consensus guidelines.
Related Content