JNJ-5322 Shows Efficacy in Later-Line Multiple Myeloma

Commentary
Video

“If you have a [patient in the] fourth or fifth line, [JNJ-5322] could be a valid drug of choice,” said Rakesh Popat, MBBS, PhD, MRCP, FRCPath.

In a phase 1 trial (NCT05652335) that evaluated the trispecific antibody JNJ-79635322 (JNJ-5322), the median number of prior lines of therapy was 4. The agent, in patients who were exposed to prior BCMA/GPRC5D-targeted therapy, elicited an overall response rate (ORR) of 55.0% at 50 to 300 mg. In those who were BCMA/GPRC5D naive, the ORR was 100.0% in both patients who received 100 mg once every 4 weeks, the recommended phase 2 dose, and in those who received 300 mg once every 4 weeks.

These results were shared at the European Hematology Association 2025 Congress by Rakesh Popat, MBBS, PhD, MRCP, FRCPath. CancerNetwork® spoke with Popat, who stated that all the patients in the trial had triple-class–exposed disease. Despite this, there were fewer patients who had triple-class–exposed and penta-refractory disease compared with initial studies for other agents such as teclistamab-cqyv (Tecvayli), elranatamab-bcmm (Elrexfio), and talquetamab-tgvs (Talvey).

He concluded by emphasizing that, for patients in the fourth or fifth line of therapy, JNJ-5322 is a valid option.

Popat is a consultant hematologist at University College Hospital, leads the Myeloma Clinical Trials Program, and is the program lead for the National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Clinical Research Facility.

Transcript:

What’s of note in this study was that these patients did have 4 or more prior lines of therapy, essentially, but they were all triple-class exposed. What we also find is if you drill down into the details, the number of patients who were penta-refractory or triple-class refractory was slightly lower than some of the initial studies with teclistamab, elranatamab, and talquetamab. It is a slightly different population. But nevertheless, what it tells us is that in the relapsed/refractory situation, this drug is highly effective. That is much better compared with some of the conventional treatments that we have. As I said, it does offer some advantages compared with the bispecific [antibodies]. If you have a [patient in the] fourth or fifth line, this could be a valid drug of choice.

Reference

Popat R, Touzeau C, Perrot A, et al. First-in-human study of JNJ-79635322 (JNJ-5322), a novel, next-generation trispecific antibody, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: initial phase 1 results. Abstract presented at: European Hematology Association 2025 Congress; June 12-15, 2025; Milan, Italy. Abstract S100.

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
According to Jorge Nieva, MD, there are a multitude of things that can be explored to enhance the treatment landscape for lung cancer.
Taletrectinib showed improved efficacy in patients with ROS1-positive non–small cell lung cancer who were treatment-naïve.
“It’s a drug that I’m very comfortable with, and it is a drug I’ll likely use primarily in the first-line setting,” stated Jorge Nieva, MD, on taletrectinib in non–small cell lung cancer.
Those being treated for peritoneal carcinomatosis may not have to experience the complication rates or prolonged recovery associated with surgical options.
For patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, integrating PIPAC into a treatment regimen does not interrupt their systemic therapy.
According to Benjamin J. Golas, MD, PIPAC could be used as a bridging therapy before surgical debulking or between subsequent large surgical operations.
Related Content