Adjuvant Treatment of Kidney Cancer Remains an Uncertainty, Says Expert

Video

“Much more research” is needed to advance the adjuvant treatment of patients with kidney cancer, according to an expert from the Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust.

During the 2022 Society for Urologic Oncology (SUO) Annual Meeting, CancerNetwork® spoke with Axel Bex, MD, PhD, a urologic surgeon at the Specialist Centre For Kidney Cancer, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, and a professor at University College London, Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, about his presentation on new developments in adjuvant therapy for renal cell carcinoma—a type of kidney cancer.

According to Bex, the only trial read out that indicated positive results in the field at this year’s meeting was the phase 3 KEYNOTE-564 trial (NCT03142334), which assessed pembrolizumab (Keytruda) in the adjuvant treatment of patients with renal cell carcinoma following nephrectomy. Despite these findings, he says that there are more developments to be expected in the adjuvant management of renal cell carcinoma.

Transcript:

The most important thing is that the field is still uncertain. You have 1 trial out of 4 that has reported as a positive trial; the other 3 are negative. It's a developing field, there's still a lot of developments to be expected in the neoadjuvant space, as well. Some would say: "how can new agents come in now with these negative results?" But if you look across our own field, we look to melanoma, for example, they use neoadjuvant trials, they actually look at the pathological response. Then, the tumors have been resected and then decided about further adjuvant settings. Just summing it up, it's important to know that 3 trials failed in this setting, but it's by no means bad. Pembrolizumab is a standard-of-care option, which is most important to know. You have to do much more research.

Related Videos
Considering cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer may help with managing the shortage of Bacillus Calmette-Guerin, according to Joshua J. Meeks, MD, PhD, BS.
Anemia in patients who receive talazoparib plus enzalutamide for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer appears to be manageable without any compromises in patient-reported outcomes and quality of life.
Patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer and visceral disease may particularly benefit from enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab, according to Amanda Nizam, MD.
High-grade adverse effects with zanidatamab plus palbociclib and fulvestrant seem to be uncommon in patients with HER2-positive, hormone receptor–positive, metastatic breast cancer, according to Sara Hurvitz, MD, FACP.
Black male patients with breast cancer appear to experience worse survival outcomes compared with White patients when controlling for clinicopathological variables, according to Jason (Jincong) Q. Freeman, MPH, MS.
Results from the ECOG-ACRIN E4112 trial appear to support the use of DCIS scores for identifying patients with breast cancer who may be eligible to omit radiotherapy following MRI-guided surgery.
Providers should inform patients with breast cancer that selecting later-line therapies following prior treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors is a “developing area,” says Abigail M. Johnston, JD.
Data from the phase 3 NATALEE trial highlight a positive toxicity profile for ribociclib as an adjuvant therapy for patients with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, says Neil M. Iyengar, MD.
Future research will focus on ctDNA dynamics change over time in the full translational cohort of patients with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer in the phase 3 monarchE study, says Stephanie L. Graff, MD.
Findings from a National Cancer Database analysis highlight no statistically significant differences in survival outcomes with chemotherapy for patients over 81 years old with triple-negative breast cancer compared with those who do not receive chemotherapy.
Related Content