Around the Practice: Updates in HER2+ Breast Cancer - Episode 9
The recent approval of novel HER2-targeted therapies has improved options for the treatment of patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC), particularly those with brain metastases. More data are needed on optimal sequencing of therapy and therapies for subgroups of patients with HER2-positive disease, according to experts who participated in a recent virtual Around the Practice panel. The panel was moderated by V.K. Gadi, MD, PhD, the University of Illinois Cancer Center in Chicago, Illinois, and included Neil Iyengar, MD,Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, New York; Claudine Isaacs, MD, Georgetown University in Washington, DC; and Virginia Kaklamani, MD,University of Texas Health San Antonio in San Antonio.
The objectives of the interactive panel, which included a live audience, were to discuss current treatment approaches and challenges for patients with relapsed or refractory HER2-positive mBC as well as new data from clinical studies presented at the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual meeting. The panel reviewed case studies of patients with HER2-positive mBC and discussed factors to consider for third-line therapies, such as quality of life (QOL).
CURRENT TREATMENT APPROACHES AND CHALLENGES
As noted by Iyengar, the increased use of neoadjuvant therapy for early-stage disease has changed thetreatment landscape for HER2-positive mBC. He typically uses the HER2/neu receptor antagonists trastuzumab (Herceptin) and pertuzumab (Perjecta) with a taxane to maximize volume reduction in the neoadjuvant setting, followed by dual HER2-targeted therapy with trastuzumab and pertuzumab in the adjuvant setting.1,2 Results from the APHINITY trial (NCT01358877) showed that the 3-year rate of invasive disease-free survival (DFS) was higher with pertuzumab than with placebo when added to chemotherapy and trastuzumab in patients with node-positive or high-risk node-negative HER2-positive operable breast cancer (94.1% vs 93.2%; HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.66-1.00; P = .045).3
In addition, Iyengar said he considers trastuzumab emtansine (Kadcyla; T-DM1) for patients with a substantial amount of residual disease in the adjuvant setting, based on results from the phase 3 KATHERINE trial (NCT01772472), which showed 3-year invasive DFS was higher with T-DM1 (88.3%) than with trastuzumab (77%) in patients with residual invasive disease in the breast or axilla after receiving neoadjuvant therapy.4 Also, Iyengar typically uses a taxane with trastuzumab and pertuzumab in the first-line metastatic setting. This is based on end-of-study results from the phase 3 CLEOPATRA trial (NCT00567190), which showed that the group treated with pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel had a longer median overall survival (OS) than the group treated with placebo, trastuzumab, and docetaxel (57.1 vs 40.8 months; HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.58-0.82; P < .0001).5
According to Iyengar, diverse options have led to more practice variation in the second-line metastatic setting, including T-DM1 as well as tucatinib (Tukysa), a kinase inhibitor, with capecitabine and trastuzumab, the latter of which is often considered for patients with brain metastases.6 In the third-line setting, Iyengar said common options include tucatinib with capecitabine and trastuzumab, trastuzumab deruxtecan (Enhertu; T-DXd), a HER2-directed antibody and topoisomerase inhibitor, standard chemotherapy with HER2 antibodies, and combinations of chemotherapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (eg, lapatinib or neratinib plus capecitabine).7-9
There are still several unmet needs for HER2-positive mBC, including lack of clinical trials addressing treatment for leptomeningeal disease, identification of the optimal duration of maintenance therapy for patients with a complete response to HER2-targeted therapy, and treatment regimens that can prevent brain metastases, Kaklamani said.
UPDATES FROM ASCO 2021
In response to Poll Question 1, which asked which studies were most relevant to the audience, 34% said HER2CLIMB (NCT02614794) followed by 25% for DESTINY-Breast01 (NCT03248492) and neoadjuvant studies. In a follow-up question about how likely data presented at ASCO2021 and this session would change respondents’ clinical practice, 55% said yes (Poll Question 2).
Isaacs noted that results from the HER2CLIMB that were presented at ASCO 2021 showed longer OS with tucatinib when added to capecitabine and trastuzumab than with placebo plus capecitabine and trastuzumab (24.7 vs 19.2 months; HR, 0.73; P = .004).10 OS improvement was also observed in the subgroup of patients with brain metastases at baseline (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.44-0.81) and in an exploratory analysis of patients with visceral metastases (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.55-0.89; P = .004).
Also, Isaacs highlighted results of studies in of patients with brain metastases in DESTINY-Breast01 presented at ASCO 2021, which showed that T-Dxd reduced baseline brain lesion diameter in 7 of 17 patients (41.2%).11
Limited data exist on optimal treatment for patients with hormone receptor–positive and HER2-positive disease, Issacs said. Resultsfrom a small phase 2 trial from China (NCT01950182) presented at ASCO 2021 showed that progression-free survival (PFS) and OS were similar between endocrine-based therapy and chemotherapy when added to trastuzumab in patients with hormone receptor-positive and HER2-positive mBC.12 Gadi and Iyengar said this regimen may be considered in individuals for whom chemotherapy is contraindicated.
Results from the phase 2 PERTAIN trial (NCT01491737) presented at ASCO 2021 showed that adding pertuzumab to trastuzumab plus an aromatase inhibitor (AI) was associated with longer medianstratified PFS in patients with locally advanced or HER2-positive MBC than trastuzumab and an AI alone (18.9 vs 15.1 months; HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.48-0.89; P = .0070).13
“I think this is an incredible space for future development of those biomarkers and risk stratification development as well as novel agents that can be combined in that maintenance setting to try to prolong that [chemotherapy]-free interval,” Iyengar said.
VISCERAL DISEASE WITH BRAIN METASTASES
Ninety-one percent of audience members said they would change their approach to treatment if their patients with visceral disease also had brain metastases (Poll Question 3). Most respondents (72%) said they screen patients with visceral disease for brain metastases only if they show symptoms (Poll Question 4).
Isaacs said she is increasingly inclined to use tucatinib in patients with brain metastases in light of results from an exploratory analysis in HER2CLIMB of patients with intracranial lesions.14 Among 291 patients with brain metastases, the estimated 1-year central nervous system PFS was 40.2% in the tucatinib group vs 0% (95% CI, 29.5%-50.6%) in the control group. Risk for progression in the brain or death was decreased by 68% with tucatinib-based treatment (HR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.22-0.48; P < .0001). Among the patients with active brain metastases and measurable intracranial disease at baseline, the confirmed ORR was higher in patients in the tucatnib group than the control group (47.3% vs 61.2%, P = .03). In these patients who responded to treatment, the median duration of response was longer in the tucatinib group than the control group (6.8 vs 3.0 months).
However, Isaacs noted that the decision to use tucatinib is “nuanced” and depends on factors such as disease burden in the brain and response to their current treatment. She noted that, if patients are generally responding well to their current systemic regimen, clinicians may choose to treat small solitary brain metastases with stereotactic radiosurgery rather than switch to tucatinib.
Iyengar said he is starting to “lean a little further away from” continuing the current systemic therapy for small or asymptomatic brain metastases, a decision informed by findings in HER2CLIMB, which showed that the median time from random assignment to second progression (brain or body) or death was longer with tucatinib than with placebo in patients who received local therapy for isolated brain metastases (15.9 vs 9.7 months; HR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.11-0.77; P = .009).14
Case 1: The panelists discussed a case study of a woman, 50 years of age, who initially presented with a 4-cm lump that was found to be HER2-positive, hormone receptor-negative breast cancer. She received 6 cycles of neoadjuvant docetaxel, carboplatin, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab (TCHP) followed by lumpectomy and radiation therapy. She obtained pathological complete response (pCR), which lasted for 32 months, until she returned to the clinic with complaints of increased fatigue, right-upper quadrant pain, loss of appetite, and persistent cough. An abdominal CT scan showed a 5.5-cm nodule in the liver, which was confirmed by liver biopsy to be HER2-positive. PET of her brain was negative for metastases. The patient received T-DM1, but a CT performed a year later showed progression in the liver.
Case 1 Discussion
Up to 20% of patients develop a distant recurrence, Isaacs estimated. Although she considered T-DM1 to be acceptable in this setting, she would have considered retreating with docetaxel, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab (THP) because this patient had a relatively long pCR. Kaklamani agreed. She said that in the first line she prefers T-DM1 and then follows up with new agents in later lines. In the third line, Kaklamani said she would likely choose a tucatinib-based regimen or T-DXd; the selection would depend on the presence of symptomatic brain metastasis, toxicities, and whether the patient was able to take orally administered medication.
She noted that interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a concern with T-DXd. In DESTINY-Breast01, 25 patients(13.6%) had treatment-related ILD and 4 patients (2.2%) died as a result of ILD.15
In lieu of data to provide insight on which patients are most susceptible to develop ILD, as a precautionary measure, Kaklamani avoids prescribing T-DXd in patients who already experienced respiratory problems after treatment. Two patients she treated required intubation post-T–DM1 therapy.
The persistent cough reported by the case study patient would discourageyengar from using T-DXd in this patient because he said it would be difficult to identify new or subjective changes in the cough that are indicative of ILD.
QOL Considerations for mBC
Poll Question 5 respondents said patient QOL is either very important (70%) or moderately important (30%) when selecting a therapy for mBC.
As Gadi noted, large clinical trials increasingly include QOL data. Kaklamani said this information is particularly important in phase 3 studies but cautioned about the potential for inherent biases to affect reported data. “When I treat 3 [or] 4 patients with a specific medication and I see really bad toxicities regardless of everything I do, that probably taints my perception of that medication,” she said.
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer instruments may be helpful for providing more accurate patient-reported outcomes with a given agent, Iyengar suggested.
Third-line Therapy Selection for MBC Without Brain Metastases
When asked how likely respondents are to use tucatinib for third-line therapy for a patient with HER2-positive mBC without brain metastases, 45% of respondents said “likely,” followed by 22% for “very likely” and “very unlikely” and 11% for “somewhat unlikely” (Poll Question 6).
For most patients with HER2-positive mBC, all of the available drugs are likely to be used at some point throughout their treatment, Isaacs said; therefore, patient preferences and a physician’s clinical judgment are likely to be important decision-making factors.
Case 2: The panelists discussed a case study of a woman, 63 years of age, who was originally diagnosed with stage IIa (T1N1M0), hormone receptor-negative, HER2-positive, right-sided invasive ductal carcinoma. She obtained pCR following neoadjuvant therapy with TCHP for 6 cycles. A CT scan conducted 36 months later discovered recurrence in the lung and bone, which was confirmed by biopsy to be hormone receptor-negative HER2-positive mBC. She was then treated with THP and obtained PR, but 18 months later, the disease progressed to the lung. After treatment with T-DM1, she obtained PR that was stable for 3 months. Six months later, she presented with new lung metastases.
Case 2 Discussion
Based on the short PFS with T-DM1, this patient likely has an aggressive disease, Iyengar hypothesized. Consequently, he would likely choose a tucatinib-based regimen or T-DXd. His therapeutic selection in this setting for a patient with visceral disease would be informed by the toxicity profiles of the available agents, the site of metastasis, whether the patient is presenting with any symptoms that are indicative of early pneumonitis or ILD, and the patient’s preferences.
While tucatinib is often preferred for brain metastases, intracranial responses could potentially occur with any active agent, Kaklamani noted. “You’re not going to go wrong picking either of these 2 agents,” she said.
At the end of the session, Isaacs said that the importance of neoadjuvant therapy has become increasingly recognized. Furthermore, the ability to adapt adjuvant therapy based on a patient’s response to neoadjuvant therapy is important.
The multiple approvals for new therapeutics in HER2-positive mBC in recent years have made it “pretty hard to run out of options,” Kaklamani observed. She said long-term efficacy data will help inform therapeutic choices, including treatment sequencing and combination strategies.
Lastly, Iyengar emphasized the importance of repeat biopsies when possible, particularly with metastatic disease, to identify the possibility of clonal evolution and to guide treatment decisions.
EDITOR’S NOTE: Interview quotes slightly modified for readability.
1. Herceptin. Prescribing information. Genentech, Inc; 2021. Accessed July 14, 2021. https://www.gene.com/download/pdf/herceptin_prescribing.pdf
2. Perjeta. Prescribing information. Genentech, Inc; 2021. Accessed July 14, 2021. https://www.gene.com/download/pdf/perjeta_prescribing.pdf
3. von Minckwitz G, Procter M, de Azambuja E, et al. Adjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in early HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(2):122-131. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1703643
4. von Minckwitz G, Huang CS, Mano MS, et al. Trastuzumab emtansine for residual invasive HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(7):617-628. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1814017
5. Swain SM, Miles D, Kim SB, et al. Pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (CLEOPATRA): end-of-study results from a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(4):519-530. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30863-0
6. Tukysa. Prescribing information. Seagen Inc; 2021. Accessed July 14, 2021. https://seagendocs.com/TUKYSA_Full_Ltr_Master.pdf
7. Enhertu. Prescribing information. Daiichi Sankyo Co, Ltd; 2021. Accessed July 14, 2021. https://dsi.com/prescribing-information-portlet/getPIContent?productName=Enhertu&inline=true
8. Tykerb. Prescribing information. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; 2021. Accessed July 14, 2021. https://www.novartis.us/sites/www.novartis.us/files/tykerb.pdf
9. Nerlynx. Prescribing information. Puma Biotechnology, Inc; 2021. Accessed August 3, 2021. https://nerlynxhcp.com/pdf/full-prescribing-information.pdf
10. Curigliano G, Mueller V, Borges V, et al. Updated results of tucatinib vs placebo added to trastuzumab and capecitabine for patients with pretreated HER2+ metastatic breast cancer with and without brain metastases (HER2CLIMB). Poster presented at: ASCO Annual Meeting, June 4-8, 2021; virtual.
11. Jerusalem G, Park YH, Yamashita T, et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer with brain metastases: a subgroup analysis of the DESTINY-Breast01 trial. Abstract presented at: ASCO Annual Meeting. June 4-8, 2021; virtual.
12. Yuan Z, Huang JJ, Hua X, et al. Trastuzumab plus endocrine therapy or chemotherapy as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer with hormone receptor positive and HER2-positive: the sysucc-002 randomized clinical trial. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(suppl 15):1003-1003. doi:10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.1003
13. Rimawi M, Ferrero JM, de la Haba-Rodriguez J, et al. First-line trastuzumab plus an aromatase inhibitor, with or without pertuzumab, in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive and hormone receptor-positive metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer (PERTAIN): a randomized, open-label phase II trial. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(28):2826-2835. doi:10.1200/JCO.2017.76.7863
14. Lin NU, Borges V, Anders C, et al. Intracranial efficacy and survival with tucatinib plus trastuzumab and capecitabine for previously treated HER2-positive breast cancer with brain metastases in the HER2CLIMB trial. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(23):2610-2619. doi:10.1200/JCO.20.00775
15. Modi S, Saura C, Yamashita T, et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan in previously treated HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(7):610-621. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1914510