Camrelizumab Plus Chemo Yields Improved Response Rates in Gastric/GEJ Cancer

Fact checked by Tim Cortese
News
Article

Results from the phase 2 FDZL-001 trial showed high OS and PFS rates when camrelizumab plus Nab-POF was used to treat patients with gastric/GEJ cancer.

Results from the phase 2 FDZL-001 trial showed high OS and PFS rates when camrelizumab plus Nab-POF was used to treat patients with gastric/GEJ cancer.

Results from the phase 2 FDZL-001 trial showed high OS and PFS rates when camrelizumab plus Nab-POF was used to treat patients with gastric/GEJ cancer.

Camrelizumab plus nab-paclitaxel (Abraxane), oxaliplatin, fluorouracil (Nab-POF) was found to have safe conversion rates with high efficacy response at 3 years for patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma, according to results from the phase 2 FDZL-001 trial (NCT04510064) presented at the 2025 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancer Symposium.

The median overall survival (OS) was not reached (NR; 95% CI, 25.4-not evaluable [NE]). The 3-year OS rate was 62.8% (95% CI, 41.6%-78.0%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was NR (95% CI, 17.0-NE). At 3-years, the PFS rate was 56.9% (95% CI, 45.7%-86.3%).

The R0 resection rate was achieved in 75.0% of patients. A pathological complete response (pCR) was noted in 23.1% of patients, the overall response rate (ORR) was 88.5%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 98.1%. The total complete response rate (CR) that included clinical complete response plus pCR was 23.1%.

“[The FDZL-001] trial preliminarily shows promising results providing a new conversion drug treatment option for patients with initially unresectable, locally advanced and limited metastatic gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma,” Qirong Geng, MD, from the Department of Medical Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China, stated during the presentation.

A total of 52 patients were enrolled, with 73.1% being male, and 50.0%, respectively, being younger than 65 or older than 65. An ECOG performance status of 0 or 1 was noted in 100% of patients, and 78.8% had metastatic disease.

The primary tumor location was either proximal gastric (34.6%), distal gastric (34.6%), gastric body (23.1%), or multicentric (7.7%). Additionally, a majority of patients did not have liver metastases (53.8%) or lung metastases (100.0%).

Patients were given 200 mg of camrelizumab plus 125 mg/m2 of nab-paclitaxel, and 85 mg/m2 of oxaliplatin. If patients were HER2-positive, they were given trastuzumab (Herceptin) at 6 mg/kg for the first dose then 4 mg/kg thereafter. Fluorouracil was given at 2.4 g/m2.

The primary end point was R0 resection rate. Key secondary end points included ORR, DCR, pCR, total CR, PFS, and OS.

Overall, 53 patients were given the study treatment with or without trastuzumab, of that 43 were HER2-negative and 10 were HER2-positive. This included the 52 evaluable patients in the per protocol set, with 39 continuing on to surgery, and 39 continuing prescheduled post-operation treatment and follow-up. Of note, 7 died during the analysis.

The subgroup analysis found that there was no difference in the OS and PFS between patients with HER2-positive and HER2-negative disease with locally advanced and limited metastatic tumors. Investigators also highlighted that the 3-year OS was above 50% for those who had HER2-negative disease or limited metastatic disease.

Regarding safety, treatment-related adverse effects (TRAEs) occurred in 100% of patients for all grade and 42.3% for grade 3/4. The most common hematologic TRAEs were anemia (86.5% vs 3.8%), neutropenia (78.8% vs 36.5%), leukopenia (63.5% vs 9.6%), and thrombocytopenia (48.1% vs 3.8%) between all grade and grade 3/4, respectively.

The non-hematologic TRAEs included reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (63.5% vs 0.0%), aspartate aminotransferase increase (51.9% vs 1.9%), alanine aminotransferase increase (50.0% vs 1.9%), rash (21.1% vs 1.9%), and febrile neutropenia (0.0% vs 3.8%) between all grade and grade 3/4, respectively.

Immune-related AEs of all grade occurred in 19.2% of patients and 3.8% for grade 3/4. The most common included adrenal insufficiency (1.9% vs 1.9%) and dermatitis (1.9% vs 1.9%) between all grade and grade 3/4, respectively.

Reference

Geng Q, Feng W, Huang H, et al. Conversion effects of PD-1 inhibitor camrelizumab (Cam) combined with Nab-POF regimen in patients (pts) with initially unresectable locally advanced or limited metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: FDZL-001 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2025;43(4):334. doi:10.1200/JCO.2025.43.4_suppl.334

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Those being treated for peritoneal carcinomatosis may not have to experience the complication rates or prolonged recovery associated with surgical options.
For patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, integrating PIPAC into a treatment regimen does not interrupt their systemic therapy.
According to Benjamin J. Golas, MD, PIPAC could be used as a bridging therapy before surgical debulking or between subsequent large surgical operations.
“If you have a [patient in the] fourth or fifth line, [JNJ-5322] could be a valid drug of choice,” said Rakesh Popat, BSc, MBBS, MRCP, FRCPath, PhD.
Earlier treatment with daratumumab may be better tolerated for patients with pretreated MRD-negative multiple myeloma.
The trispecific antibody JNJ-5322 demonstrated superior efficacy vs approved agents in multiple myeloma in results shared at the 2025 EHA Congress.
Despite CD19 CAR T-cell therapy exhibiting efficacy in patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma, less than half achieve long-term remission.
Current findings from the phase 1/2 CaDAnCe-101 trial show no predictive factors of improved responses with BGB-16673 in patients with CLL or SLL.
According to Benjamin Golas, MD, PIPAC is emerging as minimally invasive laparoscopic approach for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis.
Related Content