Certain Subgroup in RCC Derives Promising Benefit from Neoadjuvant Axitinib


Interim results from the phase 2 PADRES trial demonstrated that partial nephrectomy may be possible for a subgroup of patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma with complex masses who received neoadjuvant axitinib.

A subgroup of patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and complex masses experienced a significant reduction in tumor size that allowed for a partial nephrectomy following treatment with neoadjuvant axitinib (Inlyta), according to results from the phase 2 PADRES trial (NCT03438708) that were presented at the American Urological Association 2022 Annual Meeting.

Explaining the background of the study, lead author Kevin Hakimi, a medical student at the UC San Diego School of Medicine, said, “Up to 25% of patients presenting with renal masses have renal insufficiency or other imperative indications for nephron-conserving management. Further, although partial nephrectomy is increasingly pursued in patients with large or complex masses, a subgroup of patients with imperative indication may not initially have masses that are amenable for partial nephrectomy.”

Accordingly, Hakimiet al launched the single-arm PADRES trial (NCT03438708) to determine whether neoadjuvant therapy with the TKI axitinib could cytoreduce renal tumors and enable patients with an imperative indication to receive a partial nephrectomy.

There were 26 patients enrolled in the study, with a median age of 69.5 years. Patients had biopsy-confirmed clear cell RCC strongly indicated for partial nephrectomy with the potential for dialysis dependence if given radical nephrectomy. All patients had complex renal masses, which the study defined as a RENAL Nephrometry score in the high range of 10 to 12 and a tumor stage of cT1b to cT3M0.

There were 14 males and 12 females. The ECOG performance status was 0 for nine patients, 1 for fifteen patients, and 2 for two patients.

Patients received oral axitinib at 5 mg twice daily for 8 weeks prior to nephrectomy. The primary end point of the trial was reduction in longest tumor diameter as determined by imaging criteria. Secondary outcome measures included tumor response per RESIST criteria, feasibility of partial nephrectomy, change in RENAL Nephrometry score, survival outcomes, and post-surgical complications.

At a median follow-up of 12 months, the median reduction in tumor size was 19% (P <.001), with a median size of 7.7 cm prior to axitinib treatment and 6.3 cm after. Axitinib also led to a significant reduction in median RENAL Nephrometry score from 11 to 10 (P <.001). There were 9 patients (34.6%) who had a partial response per RECIST criteria and the remaining 17 patients had stable disease.

The specific tumor staging pre- vs post-axitinib was as follows: T1a, 0 vs 5 patients, respectively; T1b, 4 vs 3 patients; T2a, 2 vs 0 patients; T3a, 17 patients each; T3b, 3 vs 1 patient.

“Twenty patients initially presented with T3a/T3b disease and 9 patients were downstaged,” said Hakimi.

Regarding the safety of pre-operative axitinib, Hakimi said that 5 patients experienced grade 3 adverse events related to the treatment, consisting of hypertension (n = 3), fatigue (n = 1), and weigh loss (n = 1).

Surgical outcomes showed that 25 patients were able to complete nephrectomy, comprising 19 partial nephrectomies and 6 radical nephrectomies. Twenty four (92.3%) of the patients had negative margins. There were 6 patients who had grade 3/4 post-operative complications.

Hakimi also noted that, importantly, “Patients who underwent partial nephrectomy had preserved renal function.”

Regarding next steps, he said the PADRES trial “continues to accrue with an end goal of 50 patients.”


Hakimi K, Campbell S, Nguyen M, et al. Interim analysis of PADRES (prior axitinib as a determinant of outcome of renal surgery nct03438708) clinical trial. Presented during 2022 AUA Annual Meeting; New Orleans, LA. Abstract LBA01-08.

Related Videos
Considering cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer may help with managing the shortage of Bacillus Calmette-Guerin, according to Joshua J. Meeks, MD, PhD, BS.
Anemia in patients who receive talazoparib plus enzalutamide for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer appears to be manageable without any compromises in patient-reported outcomes and quality of life.
Patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer and visceral disease may particularly benefit from enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab, according to Amanda Nizam, MD.
High-grade adverse effects with zanidatamab plus palbociclib and fulvestrant seem to be uncommon in patients with HER2-positive, hormone receptor–positive, metastatic breast cancer, according to Sara Hurvitz, MD, FACP.
Black male patients with breast cancer appear to experience worse survival outcomes compared with White patients when controlling for clinicopathological variables, according to Jason (Jincong) Q. Freeman, MPH, MS.
Results from the ECOG-ACRIN E4112 trial appear to support the use of DCIS scores for identifying patients with breast cancer who may be eligible to omit radiotherapy following MRI-guided surgery.
Providers should inform patients with breast cancer that selecting later-line therapies following prior treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors is a “developing area,” says Abigail M. Johnston, JD.
Data from the phase 3 NATALEE trial highlight a positive toxicity profile for ribociclib as an adjuvant therapy for patients with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, says Neil M. Iyengar, MD.
Future research will focus on ctDNA dynamics change over time in the full translational cohort of patients with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer in the phase 3 monarchE study, says Stephanie L. Graff, MD.
Findings from a National Cancer Database analysis highlight no statistically significant differences in survival outcomes with chemotherapy for patients over 81 years old with triple-negative breast cancer compared with those who do not receive chemotherapy.
Related Content