Differences in Structural Proteins in Prostate Cells May GiveEarly Indications of Cancer

Publication
Article
OncologyONCOLOGY Vol 9 No 8
Volume 9
Issue 8

Variations in structural proteins found in the nucleus of prostatecells may indicate whether a cell will become cancerous, according

Variations in structural proteins found in the nucleus of prostatecells may indicate whether a cell will become cancerous, accordingto a Pittsburgh Cancer Institute (PCI) investigator.

Robert Getzenberg, PhD, Assistant Professor of Pathology, Surgery,Medicine and Pharmacology at PCI, presented his findings at theannual meeting of the American Urological Association in Las Vegas.Dr. Getzenberg's research focuses on nuclear alterations thatare prevalent in prostate cancer cells and are commonly used asa pathological marker for cancer.

Researchers looked at structural proteins within the cell's nucleus.These proteins form the "scaffolding framework" of thenucleus, and are involved in DNA organization. "When we startedlooking at the nuclear matrix proteins in the cells of prostatetissue, we found that there is a difference between normal andcancer cells," Dr. Getzenberg said.

Variations in nuclear matrix proteins may be a useful tool fordiagnosing early stages of prostate cancer, and may offer newstrategies for treatment, according to the investigators.

Dr. Getzenberg and his colleagues identified proteins that werepresent only in the normal prostate and were missing in both prostatecancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH); proteins foundonly in the prostate cancer cells and missing in the normal prostateand BPH; and proteins that appeared in both normal and BPH samplesbut were absent from prostate cancers.

"Differences in nuclear matrix proteins may be a fundamentalcause of, or a major contributor to, the pattern of altered geneexpression identified in prostate cancer," Dr. Getzenbergsaid.

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Specialties including neurosurgery, radiation oncology, and neuro-rehabilitation all play a notable role in the care of patients with brain tumors.
Treatment-related toxicities during neuro-oncology therapy appear well managed with dose modifications and treatment cycle holds.
The phase 3 NIVOSTOP trial evaluated an anti–PD-1 immunotherapy, nivolumab, in a patient population similar in the KEYNOTE-689 trial.
CAR T-cell therapies appear to be an evolving modality in the treatment of those with intracranial tumors, said Sylvia Kurz, MD, PhD.
Opportunities to further reduce relapses include pembrolizumab-based combination therapy and evaluating the agent’s contribution before and after surgery.
For patients with locally advanced head and neck cancers, the current standard of care for curative therapy has a cure rate of less than 50%.
According to Maurie Markman, MD, patient-reported outcomes pertain to more relevant questions surrounding the impact of therapy for patients.
CancerNetwork® spoke with Neha Mehta-Shah, MD, MSCI, about the clinical landscape for patients undergoing treatment for rare lymphomas.
Related Content