End of Life Immunotherapy Use Is Increasing in Metastatic Cancer

News
Article

Patients with metastatic cancer who are receiving treatment at nonacademic or low-volume facilities appear more likely to receive end of life immunotherapy.

“As global experience with immunotherapy continues to grow, clinicians are learning where to draw the line for patient selection such that delivery of nonbeneficial treatment is minimized and patient outcomes are optimized. Prospective data on predictors of nonresponse to immunotherapy, including biomarkers and genetic testing, will be essential to guiding this process," according to the study authors.

“As global experience with immunotherapy continues to grow, clinicians are learning where to draw the line for patient selection such that delivery of nonbeneficial treatment is minimized and patient outcomes are optimized. Prospective data on predictors of nonresponse to immunotherapy, including biomarkers and genetic testing, will be essential to guiding this process," according to the study authors.

After findings from a cohort study indicated that initiation of end of life (EOL) immunotherapy is increasing in cancer care, investigators reported that tracking usage may yield insights into national prescribing patterns and lead to changes in how advanced disease is managed.

Investigators reported that EOL immunotherapy use increased in patients across all cancer types. More than 1 in 14 instances of immunotherapy treatment in 2019 began within 1 month of death. Those who were risk-adjusted with 3 or more organs involved with metastatic disease were 3.8-fold (95% CI, 3.1-4.7; P <.001) more likely to die within a month of beginning immunotherapy compared with those who had lymph node involvement only. Additionally, receipt of treatment at an academic or high-volume center vs a nonacademic or very low–volume facility was associated with a 31% (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.65-0.74; P <.001) and 30% (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.65-0.76; P <.001) lower risk of death within a month of beginning an immunotherapeutic.

“As global experience with immunotherapy continues to grow, clinicians are learning where to draw the line for patient selection such that delivery of nonbeneficial treatment is minimized and patient outcomes are optimized,” the authors wrote. “Prospective data on predictors of nonresponse to immunotherapy, including biomarkers and genetic testing, will be essential to guiding this process.”

The study authors utilized the National Cancer Database, which includes demographic variables, treatment details, and patient outcomes. Investigators incorporated several disease types that were found to have the highest volume and longest longitudinal experience with immunotherapy, including stage IV melanoma, non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and kidney cell carcinoma (KCC). The study included patients who were 18 years or older who had been diagnosed with stage IV cancer. Those with unknown immunotherapy status or unknown timing of immunotherapy were not eligible to be included.

A total of 242,371 patients were included in the analysis. It was reported that the mean age was 67.9 years, with 42.5% of patients being more than 70 years of age. Additionally, 56.0% of patients were men, and 29.3% underwent treatment with immunotherapy.

Moreover, 57% of patients did not receive immunotherapy, 41% were treated with immunotherapy and lived for more than 1 month after beginning treatment, and 3% were treated with EOL immunotherapy. In the melanoma cohort (n = 20,415), 57%, 41%, and 3% of patients did not receive immunotherapy, received immunotherapy and lived longer than 1 month, and received EOL immunotherapy, respectively; investigators also reported immunotherapy status in the NSCLC (n = 197,331; 72%, 26%, and 3%) and KCC cohorts (n = 24,625; 73%, 26%, and 2%), respectively.

Investigators reported that both academic and high-volume facilities prescribed the most immunotherapy across all disease types. Additionally, receipt of EOL immunotherapy was found to increase parallel to the increase in overall immunotherapy rate; this included an increase from 0.8% to 4.3% in the melanoma cohort, 0.9% to 3.2% for NSCLC, and 0.5% to 2.6% for KCC. Moreover, EOL chemotherapy decreased in the melanoma group from 8.8% in 2012 to 5.1% in 2019 (P = .04); conversely, there was no significant change in proportion of EOL immunotherapy treatment (5.0% to 6.9%; P = .20).

Reference

Kerekes DM, Frey AE, Prsic EH, et al. Immunotherapy initiation at the end of life in patients with metastatic cancer in the US. JAMA Oncol. Published online January 4, 2024. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.6025

Related Videos
Cancer vaccines are a “cross-cutting approach” that may be applicable across several cancer types, according to Catherine J. Wu, MD.
mRNA may be a potential modality for developing cancer-based vaccines, according to Catherine J. Wu, MD.
Analyzing the KRAS mutation across various cancer types may be a worthwhile target when using a cancer vaccine or immunotherapy, says Catherine J. Wu, MD.
The AACR Health Disparities Report highlights the changes needed to achieve health equity for patients with cancer.
Robert A. Winn, MD, gives insight into how institutions and community practices can improve access to cancer care.
In the October edition of Snap Recap, we review the latest FDA news and the vote from the last ODAC meeting.
In this September edition of Snap Recap, we share our highlights from Prostate Cancer Awareness Month, news in the breast cancer space, and the latest FDA updates.
Implementing tax benefits for manufacturers who produce chemotherapy drugs may be one solution to increase drug production in the United States, according to Lucio N. Gordan, MD.
Lucio N. Gordan, MD, describes how his practice deals with increasing costs of limited chemotherapy agents to ensure that patients with cancer continue to receive treatment.
Related Content