FDG and NaF PET/CT Predictive for Overall Survival in Genitourinary Malignancies


At 2022 ASCO GU, early trial results show promise for fluorodeoxyglucose and sodium fluoride PET/CT prognostic ability to predict survival in patients with metastatic genitourinary malignancies treated with cabozantinib plus PD-1/CTLA-3 inhibition.

Data presented at the 2022 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium that that baseline parameters associated with fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT and sodium fluoride (NaF) PET/CT may be linked with overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic genitourinary (mGU) malignancies.

These parameters along with the percent change in number of lesions were determined to be prognostic in patients who were treated with the combination of cabozantinib (Cabometyx) plus nivolumab (Opdivo) with or without ipilimumab (Yervoy) according to findings in a phase 1 study. FDG PET/CT was risk stratified based on high vs low semi-quantitative parameters, whereas NaF PET/CT functioned best by risk stratifying according to the presence or absence of lesions.1

FDG PET/CT scanning parameters were metabolic volume tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), hottest maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), and number of lesions. NaF PET/CT scanning parameters were fluoride uptake tumor volume (FTV), total lesion fluoride uptake (TLF), and number of lesions.

In 81 patients studied, investigators analyzed 957 FDG PET/CT and 414 NaF PET/CT lesions.

The most significant association with OS was found with the baseline MTV parameter (HR = 2.87, 95% CI, 1.62-5.08; P = .0003) and The FDG lesion number percent change (HR = 2.71; 95% CI, 1.40-5.24, P = .0031).

Investigators observed that MTV, with a baseline of 54 or less, had a median OS (mOS) of 31 months. A baseline greater than 54 had a median OS of 11 months (P = .0002). A TLG baseline of lower than 216 had an mOS of 30 months vs 11 months with a TLG of 216 or more (P = .0004). Patients with the hottest SUVmax less than 10.5 had an mOS of 25 months vs 12 months for those whose hottest SUVmax was 10.5 or greater (P = .025). Patients with fewer than 3 lesions had an mOS of 79 months compared with 15 months in patients with 3 or more lesions (P = .0005). Patients whose FDG PET percent change lesion number was decreasing had an mOS of 24 months vs 17 months for patients with stable lesion numbers. In patients whose FDG percent change lesion number was increasing, the mOS was 12 months (P = .021).

NaF PET/CT saws the most significant OS association in the number of lesions. Those without lesions had an mOS of 26 months vs 16 months in patients with 1 or more lesions (P = .007). The TLF in patients who were 0, between 1 and 130, and greater than 130 had an mOS of 26 vs 18 vs 14 months, respectively (P = .026). The FTV in patients who were 0, between 0 and 40, and greater than 40 had an mOS of 26 vs 20 vs 12 months, respectively (P = .016).

All 81 patients had a baseline FDG PET scan, and 78 had a baseline NaF PET scan. Patients received an 8-week FDG PET/CT and NaF PET/CT imaging follow up.

The majority of patients were male (83%). Forty-eight patients (59%) received the doublet combination and 33 patients (41%) received the triplet combination. The most common cancers found were urothelial (37%), renal clear cell (19%), and germ cell tumor (11%). Investigators assessed that the distribution of lesions found was 43% lymph nodal (n = 411), 26% lung (n = 252), 16% bone (n = 152), 9% liver (n = 87), and 6% other visceral metastases (n = 55).

The investigators suggest examining circulating biomarkers and imaging parameters to better predict patient outcomes in patients with mGU malignancies.


Simon N, Lei K, Verdini NP, et al. The association of FDG PET/CT and NaF PET/CT with survival outcomes in patients (pts) with metastatic genitourinary malignancies (mGU) treated with cabozantinib + nivolumab +/- ipilimumab (CaboNivo +/- Ipi). J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(suppl 6):452. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2022.40.6_suppl.452

Related Videos
Cretostimogene grenadenorepvec’s efficacy compares favorably with the current nonsurgical standards of care in high-risk, Bacillus Calmette Guerin–unresponsive non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.
Artificial intelligence models may be “seamlessly incorporated” into clinical workflow in the management of prostate cancer, says Eric Li, MD.
Robust genetic testing guidelines in the prostate cancer space must be supported by strong clinical research before they can be properly implemented, says William J. Catalona, MD.
Treatment with tisotumab vedotin may be a standard of care in second- or third-line recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer, says Brian Slomovitz, MD, MS, FACOG.
Future analyses will look at durvalumab/olaparib for endometrial cancer populations with TP53 and POLE alterations, as well as those with estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor positivity.
Patients with mismatch repair proficient, newly diagnosed, advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer may have enhanced benefit with the addition of olaparib to durvalumab.
Common adverse effects following treatment with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in the phase 3 CLEAR study include diarrhea, hypertension, and fatigue, according to Thomas E. Hutson, DO, PharmD, FACP.
Lenvatinib in combination with pembrolizumab appears to raise no new safety signals in patients with advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma after 4 years of follow-up in the phase 3 CLEAR study.
According to Thomas E. Hutson, DO, PharmD, FACP, 4-year follow-up data from the phase 3 CLEAR study confirm the maintained benefits of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.
Findings from the phase 3 MIRASOL trial support mirvetuximab soravtansine as a standard treatment option for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, according to Ritu Salani, MD.
Related Content