Fumiko Chino, MD, on Medicare’s Impact on Cancer Mortality Rates

Video

In a recent interview with CancerNetwork, Fumiko Chino, MD, discussed the need to evaluate Medicare’s impact on cancer mortality rates, and moreover, what she and her colleagues found in a recent study presented at the 2020 ASCO Virtual Program.

According to data presented at the 2020 ASCO Virtual Program, states that expanded Medicaid coverage saw a steeper decline in cancer mortality rates, compared to those that didn’t follow the passage of the Affordable Care Act of 2010.

In a recent interview with CancerNetwork, Fumiko Chino, MD, discussed the need to evaluate Medicare’s impact on cancer mortality rates, and moreover, what she and her colleagues found.

Transcription:

I think that health and healthcare inequity has been a major issue in the United States. And part of that is driven by equal access to care and health insurance. The Affordable Care Act was specifically designed to try to improve these disparities through improving insurance status. And we know already that unfortunately, equal access to care can really be associated with poor quality of care, and ultimately survival.

So when we were putting together the study, we really were trying to figure out what the true benefit of the Affordable Care Act was, because there's been some evidence in the past that we've improved insurance status and that maybe patients are being diagnosed at an earlier stage, and maybe that the timeliness of the treatment is improving. But ultimately, what matters to most people is survival. So we wanted to show that the Affordable Care Act did have a meaningful impact on cancer survival.

We actually looked at a comprehensive national database, which included essentially everyone in the United States, all US residents who died from cancer, and we calculated age-adjusted cancer mortality for the entire US population but separated it into 2 groups: an expanded state cohort and a non-expanded state cohort. And we followed them over time. So not just in the peri-ACA years when Medicaid was being expanded, but also to establish their baselines.

What we found is that there really was a mortality difference between the 2 state cohorts and that unfortunately, there's been no cancer disparities. So basically, patients who live and expanded states, quite simply do better. And they did better even before the Affordable Care Act. But there was an additional cancer mortality benefit from states that expanded Medicaid and this is the first comprehensive national study to show this and I think that it's pretty impressive that we were able to show this in just a couple of years of follow up because I think as you know, it's not like you get diagnosed with cancer and then immediately you know, have a poor outcome. It really does take years, sometimes for a cancer diagnosis to ultimately, unfortunately kill people. So the fact that we were able to show it with just a couple of years of follow up is pretty phenomenal.

Related Videos
Howard A. Burris, MD, highlighted previous findings of the phase 3 TOPAZ-1 trial assessing durvalumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin vs placebo plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in advanced biliary tract cancer and patient-reported outcomes (PRO)data that were presented at 2022 ASCO.
Shubham Pant, MD, spoke to the potential of ELI-002 2P as a treatment for minimal residual disease positivity in patients with KRAS-mutant solid tumors.
Eric J. Sherman, MD, highlights several drugs that are being used to treat RET-positive thyroid cancer.
Eric J. Sherman, MD, on the Efficacy of Cabozantinib in Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer
Eric J. Sherman, MD, a medical oncologist at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center,
Eric J. Sherman, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center highlights research on adjuvant capecitabine in nasopharynx cancer.
Related Content