Fumiko Chino, MD, on Next Steps in Evaluating Medicare’s Impact on Cancer Mortality Rates

Video

The expert explained how states that expanded Medicaid coverage saw a steeper decline in cancer mortality rates, and next steps for further evaluation.

States that expanded Medicaid coverage saw a steeper decline in cancer mortality rates, compared to those that didn’t follow the passage of the Affordable Care Act of 2010, according to Fumiko Chino, MD, and colleagues.

“What we found is that there really was a mortality difference between the 2 state cohorts and that unfortunately, there's been no cancer disparities. So basically, patients who live and expanded states, quite simply do better,” she explained in an interview with CancerNetwork. “And they did better even before the Affordable Care Act. But there was an additional cancer mortality benefit from states that expanded Medicaid.”

Chino went on to discuss the clinical implications of their study, as well as next steps.

Transcription:

I think the driving line for me is that cancer care really shouldn't be a political issue. But unfortunately, we really know that the debate over health insurance is. And I think that our study really helps show that a national healthcare initiative like the Affordable Care Act can really make a difference. And that health insurance matters. I think it's just as simple as that. I don't think it's a political issue.

I really do think that our true North, in terms of taking care of patients is just wanting what's best for them, what allows them to have the best access to care, a timely access to care, and then most treatment options. And I think if it's a difference of having no insurance versus newly acquired Medicaid insurance, I think we can show that the Medicaid insurance really makes a difference.

As I mentioned earlier, we only have a couple of years of follow-up data after the Affordable Care Act was rolled out, for the calculations from 2015 to 2017. So basically, as every year as we get more data, I think we could potentially show an even bigger difference. So just more time will help. But then also we wanted to look at specific patient populations to specific types of cancers to show maybe there were certain cancers that really did have the most benefit and we have some ideas of which cancers to look at first, but those would be the next steps for this analysis.

Recent Videos
Advocacy groups such as Cancer Support Community and the Leukemia & Lymphoma Society may help support patients with CML undergoing treatment.
Paolo Tarantino, MD, discusses the potential utility of agents such as datopotamab deruxtecan and enfortumab vedotin in patients with breast cancer.
Paolo Tarantino, MD, highlights strategies related to screening and multidisciplinary collaboration for managing ILD in patients who receive T-DXd.
Those with CML should discuss adverse effects such as nausea or fatigue with their providers to help optimize their quality of life during treatment.
Patients with CML can become an active part of their treatment plan by discussing any questions that come to mind with their providers.
Jorge E. Cortes, MD, emphasizes proper communication between patients with chronic myeloid leukemia and their providers during the treatment course.
Dietary interventions or other medications may help mitigate diarrhea in patients who undergo therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia.
Considering notable adverse effects associated with treatment may be critical when selecting therapy options for those with CML.
Byoung Chul Cho, MD, PhD, highlights ongoing trials assessing intravenous and subcutaneous amivantamab in EGFR-mutant non–small cell lung cancer.
An AI-based system may reduce the time needed to match patients with cancer to suitable clinical trials.
Related Content