Fuzuloparib Maintenance Therapy Prolonged Progression-Free Survival, Maintained Safety for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

Article

Data presented at the Society of Gynecologic Oncology 2021 Annual Meeting on Women’s Cancer found a statistically significant benefit with fuzuloparib maintenance therapy compared with placebo for patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer.

Implementing fuzuloparib as maintenance therapy for patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer prolonged median progression-free survival (PFS) when compared with placebo, according to data from a phase 3 trial (NCT03863860) presented at the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) 2021 Virtual Annual Meeting on Women’s Cancer.

Patients experienced a benefit from fuzuloparib maintenance therapy regardless of germline BRCA1/2 status, and no further safety signals were observed in the analysis.

“Fuzuloparib as maintenance therapy achieved a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS for patients with platinum-sensitive, relapsed ovarian cancer compared with placebo regardless of BRCA mutation and had a manageable safety profile,” presenting author, Ning Li, MD, of the Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, explained in her presentation of the data.

The randomized, double-blind study assessed the efficacy and safety of fuzuloparib maintenance therapy for this cohort of patients. The population was randomized 2:1 to receive either 150 mg of fuzuloparib (n = 167) or placebo (n = 85) in 4-week cycles.

Eligible patients for the population had platinum-sensitive, relapsed, high-grade serious ovarian, fallopian tube, primary peritoneal, or endometrioid ovarian carcinoma. More, the patients received 2 or more previous platinum-based regimens and achieved a complete or partial response to their last treatment of that type.

The primary end point of the research was PFS assessed by a blinded independent review committee (BIRC). Key secondary end points included investigator-assessed PFS, chemotherapy-free interval, overall survival, safety, and objective response rate for patients with measurable disease at baseline.

The median PFS assessed by BIRC was 12.9 months (95% CI, 11.1-not reached [NR]) for patients receiving fuzuloparib compared with 5.5 months (95% CI, 3.8-5.6) for patients receiving placebo (HR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.17-0.36; P < .0001). Regardless of BRCA mutation status, median PFS per BIRC assessment was longer for the fuzuloparib group than with placebo.

More, median investigator-assessed PFS showed similar data, with the fuzuloparib group at 12.9 months (95% CI, 11.1-NR) compared with 5.4 months (95% CI, 3.8-5.6) for the placebo group (HR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.18-0.39; P < .0001).

“Previous phase 1 and phase 2 studies have revealed that fuzuloparib [at] 150 mg [twice daily] was well tolerated as [the recommended phase 2 dose] showed promising antitumor activity in patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer and germline BRCA mutations who had received prior 2 to 4 lines of chemotherapy,” Li said.

Focusing on one of the key secondary end points, the median chemotherapy-free interval was NR for patients in the fuzuloparib group and recorded at 11.6 months (95% CI, 8.8-NR) for the placebo group (HR, 0.30; 95%, 0.18-0.48; P < .0001).

Examining the safety profile of fuzuloparib compared with placebo, 48.5% of patients in the fuzuloparib group experienced grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) versus only 10.7% in the placebo group. Serious AEs were recorded in 10.8% and 3.8% of patients in the fuzuloparib and placebo groups, respectively. No treatment-related deaths were reported.

Phase 3 research focusing on fuzuloparib as first-line maintenance therapy to treat patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (NCT04229615) is ongoing, with a primary end point of IRC-assessed PFS.

Reference:

Li N, Zhang Y, Wang J, et al. Fuzuloparib maintenance therapy in patients with platinum-sensitive, relapsed ovarian cancer: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial. Presented at: 2021 Society of Gynecologic Oncology Virtual Annual Meeting on Women’s Cancer. Abstract 11557.

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Future findings from a translational analysis of the OVATION-2 trial may corroborate prior clinical data with IMNN-001 in advanced ovarian cancer.
The dual high-affinity binding observed with ISB 2001 may avoid resistance mechanisms reported with other BCMA-targeted therapies.
The use of chemotherapy trended towards improved recurrence-free intervals in older patients with high-risk tumors as determined via the MammaPrint assay.
Use of a pharmacist-directed resource appears to improve provider confidence and adverse effect monitoring for patients undergoing infusion therapy.
Reshma L. Mahtani, DO, describes how updates from the DESTINY-Breast09, ASCENT-04, and VERITAC-2 trials may shift practices in the breast cancer field.
Co-hosts Kristie L. Kahl and Andrew Svonavec highlight what to look forward to at the 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting, from hot topics and emerging trends to travel recommendations.
Approximately 10% of patients discontinued treatment with avutometinib/defactinib due to toxicity in the phase 2 RAMP 201 trial.
Response rates appeared to be higher with avutometinib plus defactinib vs avutometinib alone in the phase 2 RAMP 201 study.
Patients who respond to avutometinib/defactinib may be maintained on treatment for long periods of time, says Rachel N. Grisham, MD.
Related Content