Improved Responses in Pancreatic Cancer With Gemcitabine/Docetaxel

Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 10 No 12
Volume 10
Issue 12

SAN FRANCISCO-Two phase II chemotherapy regimens combining gemcitabine (Gemzar) and docetaxel (Taxotere) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer show higher response rates than gemcitabine alone and suggest further explorations of the combination are warranted, according to presentations at the 37th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO).

SAN FRANCISCO—Two phase II chemotherapy regimens combining gemcitabine (Gemzar) and docetaxel (Taxotere) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer show higher response rates than gemcitabine alone and suggest further explorations of the combination are warranted, according to presentations at the 37th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO).

Robert C. Shepard, MD, associate professor of medicine, University of Virginia Cancer Center, Charlottesville, pointed out that some of the highest response rates in pancreatic cancer have been reported with docetaxel, and many in vitro studies suggest synergism between docetaxel and gemcitabine. Also, the combination has been effective in lung cancer. "Pancreatic cancer is even more resistant than lung cancer to chemotherapy, which is why we wanted to look at the combination in pancreatic cancer," Dr. Shepard said.

In Dr. Shepard’s ECOG trial (abstract 614), patients received intravenous docetaxel (75 mg/m² over 1 hour) then gemcitabine (2,000 mg/m² over 30 minutes) given biweekly for four cycles. The 32 patients received a median of four cycles of therapy (range, 1 to 12).

At a median follow-up of 8.6 months, there were two confirmed complete responses, two partial responses, and three patients with no change. The overall response rate was 12.5%; including stable disease, the rate was 22%. Eight patients (25%) were alive at the time of the presentation. One of the complete responders remained progression free, Dr. Shepard said.

Neutropenia was the most common severe toxicity (grade 3-4), with 13 events. Dehydration and fatigue were reported 7 and 6 times, respectively. There were 6 occurrences of grade 3 or higher febrile neutropenia. One patient expired with a myocardial event. There was no pulmonary toxicity.

Noting that response rates with gemcitabine alone are in the 6% to 9% range, Dr. Shepard commented: "It’s an advance, but not a home run. You can say that it is almost a 50% gain in median survival, but in absolute numbers, the change is not that big."

German Study

A second trial of a docetaxel and gemcitabine combination (abstract 624) also found tolerability and increased response rates. In a multicenter study, 43 patients with inoperable advanced or recurrent pancreatic cancer received gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m² and docetaxel 35 mg/m² (on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle), said Karsten Ridwelski, MD, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.

After a mean of 3.2 cycles, 3 patients (7%) had a complete response, and 5 (11.6%) had a partial response, for an overall response rate of 19%. Eighteen patients remained stable (42%). Noting a median overall survival of 9 months and 1-year survival of 13.9%, Dr. Ridwelski concluded that the small survival advantage over gemcitabine alone warrants a phase III trial comparing the combination with gemcitabine monotherapy.

Toxicity was mild to moderate in most cases, except for alopecia. There were no grade 4 toxicities.

Dr. Shepard observed that the findings in the two studies buttress each other. Regarding future directions, Dr. Shepard said, "My bias is that dose escalation doesn’t work in metastatic solid tumors. You need, instead, to be smarter about combining active chemotherapeutic agents, perhaps with biologic agents such as the new antiangiogenesis agents, for example thalidomide [Thalomid] or thalidomide derivatives."

Dr. Shepard also expressed interest in using COX-2 inhibitors. He has proposed a study with lower doses of gemcitabine/docetaxel (800 mg/m², 35 mg/m²), adding a lower than typical dose of capecitabine (Xeloda) (about 1,500 mg/m²/d), and including thalidomide or a derivative and the COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib (Celebrex). The latter has demonstrated significant in vitro activity against pancreatic cancer cell lines and would offer analgesia as well, he said.

Related Videos
An expert from the University of California, Los Angeles suggests that the NALIRIFOX may be a beneficial treatment for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who receive NALIRIFOX tend to have more gastrointestinal toxicity while nab-paclitaxel/gemcitabine results in more cytopenias, according to an expert from University of California, Los Angeles.
An expert from the University of California, Los Angeles described the purpose and design of the phase 3 NAPOLI-3 study, assessing NALIRIFOX in metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Data from a ctDNA analysis of the phase 3 INTRIGUE study indicate that KIT mutational status may be associated with response to certain Tyrosine kinase inhibitors in GIST, according to an expert from the Yale Cancer Center in New Haven, Massachusetts.
Future research into the management of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma may involve combining local therapies with checkpoint inhibitors like durvalumab and tremelimumab, according to Ghassan K. Abou-Alda, MD.
Patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma who have recurrent disease following surgery or locally advanced diseases who will likely progress on local therapy may have an opportunity to benefit from tremelimumab and durvalumab following its FDA approval, according to Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, MD.
Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, MD, discusses the importance of improving access to novel therapies and combinations for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma across the world.
Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa, MD, spoke about the recent approval of tremelimumab plus durvalumab for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, based on results from the phase 3 HIMALAYA trial.
Related Content