Ixempra gets ok for resistant breast cancer

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 16 No 11
Volume 16
Issue 11

FDA has approved Bristol-Myers Squibb's Ixempra (ixabepilone) for treatment of resistant or refractory metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer.

ROCKVILLE, Maryland—FDA has approved Bristol-Myers Squibb's Ixempra (ixabepilone) for treatment of resistant or refractory metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer. "We now have an important new option for patients with metastatic breast cancer who have rapidly progressed through currently approved chemotherapies," said Ixempra investigator Linda Vahdat, MD, of New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center.

Ixempra, a semisynthetic analog of epothilone B that acts as a microtubule inhibitor, is indicated for use as a single agent in patients with advanced breast cancer who are no longer responding to anthracyclines, taxanes, and capecitabine (Xeloda), and in combination with capecitabine in patients with metastatic or locally advanced tumors that are refractory to anthracycline and taxane treatment, or in those patients whose cancer is taxane-resistant and further anthracycline therapy is contraindicated.

FDA's approval was based on the analyses of two multicenter trials that enrolled 878 patients.

A phase II single-arm trial evaluated Ixempra as monotherapy in 126 patients with advanced disease resistant to three prior therapies (an anthracycline, a taxane, and capecitabine). Among 113 evaluable patients, 12.4% had an objective partial response.

Treatment-related adverse events included peripheral neuropathy (62%; grade 3-4 14%) and fatigue/asthenia (56%, grade 3-4 13%). Grade 3-4 hematological events included neutropenia (54%) and leukopenia (49%).

Combination therapy

A randomized phase III trial compared Ixempra/capecitabine to capecitabine alone. The investigators accrued 752 patients with prior resistance to anthracyclines and taxanes. Anthracycline resistance was defined as progression while on therapy or within 6 months in the adjuvant setting or 3 months in the metastatic state. Taxane resistance was defined as progression while on therapy or within 12 months in the adjuvant setting or 3 months in the metastatic setting.

FDA found that Ixempra plus cape-citabine significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS), compared with capecitabine alone: 5.7 months vs 4.1 months (HR 0.69, P < .0001).

Results updated at ECCO 2007 showed progression-free survival of 5.8 months vs 4.2 months (P = .0003). Said investigator Jacek Jassem, MD, of the Medical University of Gdansk, Poland, "Epothilones work differently than other classes of chemotherapy and are less susceptible to known tumor resistance mechanisms. Therefore, we believe this new class, and ixabepilone in particular, may be an effective treatment option for some metastatic breast cancer patients."

Ixempra/capecitabine also significantly improved PFS in the poor-prognosis subgroup of HER2 patients who had failed trastuzumab (Herceptin) as well as athracyclines/taxanes, according to a presentation at the 2007 ASCO Breast Cancer Symposium (abstract 151).

"This suggests that ixabepilone may be a candidate to combine with HER2-targeting agents," said Guillermo Lerzo, MD, of Hospital de Oncologia Maria Curie, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Two ongoing clinical trials are underway to determine if Ixempra significantly improves survival.

Safety analysis

In the safety analysis, neuropathy was the most significant adverse nonhematological event, with grade 3-4 neuropathy seen in 21% of the combination patients vs 0% on capecitabine alone. Grade 3-4 neutropenia and leukopenia occurred in 68% and 57%, respectively, of the combination patients vs 11% and 6% of the capecitabine-alone patients.

Ixempra should not be taken by patients who have reacted adversely to drugs that contain Cremophor or its derivatives, or by those with baseline bone marrow suppression. Ixempra with capecitabine is also contraindicated in patients with moderate-to-severe liver problems.

Related Videos
Sara M. Tolaney, MD, MPH, an expert on breast cancer
Sara M. Tolaney, MD, MPH, an expert on breast cancer
The August CancerNetwork Snap Recap takes a look back at key FDA news updates, as well as expert perspectives on the chemotherapy shortage.
Ann H. Partridge, MD, MPH, talks about how fertility preservation can positively impact the psychosocial health in patients with breast cancer.
Daniel G. Stover, MD, describes how findings from the phase 3 NATALEE trial may support expanding the portion of patients who receive CDK 4/6 inhibitors as a treatment for hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.
Daniel G. Stover, MD, suggests that stromal tumor infiltrating lymphocytes may serve as a biomarker of immune activation and can potentially help optimize therapy with microtubule-targeting agents for patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Sara M. Tolaney, MD, MPH, discusses how, compared with antibody-drug conjugates, chemotherapy produces low response rates and disease control in the treatment of those with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.
Hope Rugo, MD, speaks to the importance of identifying patients with aromatase inhibitor–resistant, hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who are undergoing treatment with capivasertib/fulvestrant who may be at a high risk of developing diabetes or hyperglycemia.
Sara M. Tolaney, MD, MPH, describes the benefit of sacituzumab govitecan for patients with HER2-low metastatic breast cancer seen in the final overall survival analysis of the phase 3 TROPiCS-02 study.
An expert from Dana-Farber Cancer Institute describes which patients hormone receptor-positive,  HER2-negative breast cancer will benefit most from treatment with sacituzumab govitecan.
Related Content