Matthew D. Galsky, MD, on Key Takeaways From 2021 ASCO Annual Meeting in Bladder Cancer

Video

CancerNetwork® sat down with Matthew D. Galsky, MD, at the 2021 ASCO Annual Meeting to discuss his thoughts on research he believes has the greatest potential to impact standard of care treatment of bladder cancer.

At the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, CancerNetwork® spoke with Matthew D. Galsky, MD, of Mount Sinai Hospital in New York, regarding bladder-sparing approaches to bladder cancer and how new data may motivate more clinicians to utilize these treatment strategies. Galsky and colleagues presented findings from a study combining bladder-sparing surgery and systemic neoadjuvant therapy with nivolumab and chemotherapy.

Transcript:

I think that the biggest impact from studies at ASCO this year in the bladder cancer field probably have to do with bladder-sparing approaches. They really mark a new dawn in bladder-sparing approaches in bladder cancer in terms of integrating immune checkpoint blockade with radiation, or even without radiation in terms of trying to achieve bladder sparing. This is an approach that’s, of course, been used for decades. It is standard of care. There’s level one evidence for the approach, although it’s not practiced as frequently in some parts of the world as others. It could be that the integration of a new treatment modality into the bladder-sparing arena is a tipping point that is needed to really [motivate] the community to embrace this as a reasonable option for patients with bladder cancer.

Reference

Galsky MD, Daneshmand S, Chan KG, et al. Phase 2 trial of gemcitabine, cisplatin, plus nivolumab with selective bladder sparing in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC): HCRN GU 16-257. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(suppl 15):4503. doi:10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.4503

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Spatial transcriptomics and multiplex immunohistochemistry from samples may elucidate outcomes for patients who undergo surgical care for cancer.
Future work may focus on optimizing symptom management associated with percutaneous transesophageal gastrostomy placement in malignant bowel obstructions.
Post-operative length of stay ranged from 4 to 9 days for patients who underwent percutaneous transesophageal gastrostomy for malignant bowel obstructions.
Comprehensive prehabilitation may help prepare patients for bladder-preserving surgery, helping to optimize quality of life outcomes.
Ongoing research suggests environmental exposures and the role of microbiomes may influence bladder cancer development and response to treatment.
Future research will aim to assess the efficacy of PIPAC-MMC plus systemic therapy vs systemic therapy alone in patients with peritoneal tumors.
Although small incision surgery may serve as a conduit to deliver PIPAC-MMC, it may confer benefits in the staging and treatment of peritoneal tumors.
Patients with peritoneal metastases were historically associated with limited survival and low consideration for clinical trials.
Findings from the OVARIO study show that patients with HRR–deficient and BRCA-mutated disease benefitted the most from niraparib/bevacizumab maintenance.
Related Content