Michael Kim, MD, Discusses Study on Mutant p53 and Oncogenic KRAS in Pancreatic Cancer

Video

The MD Anderson expert discussed the main takeaway from the data published during the virtual AACR Annual Meeting, while looking forward to what comes next with these genetic drivers.

Michael Kim, MD, from The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, spoke with CancerNetwork about the main takeaways and potential action regarding mutant p53 and oncogenic KRAS in pancreatic cancer to be taken from his research presented at the virtual AACR Annual Meeting.

Transcription:

Targeting genetic drivers of cancer has proven to be very successful. For example, in melanoma and in certain types of hematopoietic malignancies (leukemias and GI stromal tumors), we know that targeting genetic drivers can be very effective. But we don't have any therapies that target oncogenic KRAS that's prevalent in pancreatic cancer. And we have no therapies that target mutant p53. Since these are the heart and brain of pancreatic cancer, we need to find novel ways to target these. One way is to identify how they work together and attack that cooperative signaling node somewhat like dividing and conquering.

So, if we can disentangle or decouple oncogenic KRAS from mutant p53, our hope is that we can prevent or highly disrupt metastasis. And then we can use other targeted, or potentially immunotherapies, to kill the actual tumor cells. So, it's really kind of identifying CREB1 is the link between oncogenic KRAS effectors and mutant p53 gain of function. And then using other drugs in our armamentarium to target the tumor cells themselves.

Related Videos
Tailoring neoadjuvant therapy regimens for patients with mismatch repair deficient gastroesophageal cancer represents a future step in terms of research.
Not much is currently known about the factors that may predict pathologic responses to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in this population, says Adrienne Bruce Shannon, MD.
Data highlight that patients who are in Black and poor majority areas are less likely to receive liver ablation or colorectal liver metastasis in surgical cancer care.
Findings highlight how systemic issues may impact disparities in outcomes following surgery for patients with cancer, according to Muhammad Talha Waheed, MD.
Pegulicianine-guided breast cancer surgery may allow practices to de-escalate subsequent radiotherapy, says Barbara Smith, MD, PhD.
Adrienne Bruce Shannon, MD, discussed ways to improve treatment and surgical outcomes for patients with dMMR gastroesophageal cancer.
Barbara Smith, MD, PhD, spoke about the potential use of pegulicianine-guided breast cancer surgery based on reports from the phase 3 INSITE trial.
Patient-reported symptoms following surgery appear to improve with the use of perioperative telemonitoring, says Kelly M. Mahuron, MD.
Treatment options in the refractory setting must improve for patients with resected colorectal cancer peritoneal metastasis, says Muhammad Talha Waheed, MD.
Although immature, overall survival data from the KEYNOTE-868 trial may support the use of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in patients with endometrial cancer.
Related Content