Mirvetuximab Soravtansine Yields Meaningful OS in Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer

News
Article

Data from the phase 3 MIRASOL trial support mirvetuximab soravtansine as a new standard of care for patients with folate receptor α–positive, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, says Kathleen N. Moore, MD, MS.

“[We believe] these data are practice-changing and position mirvetuximab as a new standard of care for patients with FRα-positive platinum-resistant ovarian cancer,” according to Kathleen N. Moore, MD, MS.

“[We believe] these data are practice-changing and position mirvetuximab as a new standard of care for patients with FRα-positive platinum-resistant ovarian cancer,” according to Kathleen N. Moore, MD, MS.

Mirvetuximab soravtansine-gynx (Elahere) is the first novel therapy to produce an overall survival (OS) benefit among patients with folate receptor α (FRα)–high, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer in a phase 3 setting, according to exploratory analysis findings from the phase 3 MIRASOL trial (NCT04209855) presented at the 2023 Annual Global Meeting of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society (IGCS).

Among patients who were naïve to treatment with PARP inhibitors, the median OS was 14.82 months (95% CI, 11.33-not reached [NR]) with mirvetuximab soravtansine (n = 97) vs 15.44 months (95% CI, 12.39-17.41) with investigator’s choice of chemotherapy (n = 94; HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.59-1.38; P = .6319). Among those who previously received a PARP inhibitor, the median OS was 19.88 months (95% CI, 15.61-NR) in the mirvetuximab soravtansine arm (N = 124) vs 11.37 months (95% CI, 9.89-13.77) in the chemotherapy arm (n = 127; HR 0.48; 95% CI, 0.33-0.71; P = .0002).

In a population of patients who received 1 or 2 prior lines of therapy, the median OS was 16.46 months (95% CI, 12.88-NR) with mirvetuximab soravtansine (n = 122) vs 13.77 months (95% CI, 11.20-16.69) with chemotherapy (n = 123; HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.45-0.98; P = .0375). For those who received 3 prior lines of treatment, the median OS was 17.35 months (95% CI, 12.81-20.24) in the mirvetuximab soravtansine arm (n = 105) vs 12.39 months (95% CI, 9.63-13.34) in the chemotherapy arm (n = 103; HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.43-0.96; P = .0308).

“[We believe] these data are practice-changing and position mirvetuximab as a new standard of care for patients with FRα-positive platinum-resistant ovarian cancer,” senior author Kathleen N. Moore, MD, MS, associate director of clinical research at Stephen Cancer Center in The University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, said during the presentation.

In the open-label MIRASOL trial, 453 patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive mirvetuximab soravtansine at 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks or investigator’s choice of paclitaxel, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, or topotecan. Patients were stratified by the type of chemotherapy they received and number of prior lines of therapy.

The study’s primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS), with key secondary end points including investigator-assessed overall response rate (ORR), OS, and patient-reported outcomes. Other secondary end points included duration of response (DOR), PFS2, and safety/tolerability.

Those with platinum-resistant, FRα–high disease as detected via immunohistochemistry; high-grade serous histology; and who previously received 1 to 3 prior lines of therapy were eligible to enroll on the trial. Patients who previously received treatment with PARP inhibitors and bevacizumab (Avastin), as well as those with disease harboring BRCA mutations, were able to enroll on the trial.

According to Moore, a higher proportion of patients in the PARP inhibitor–naïve cohort underwent 1 or 2 previous lines of therapy, although most patients across the entire population received 3 prior lines of treatment. Additionally, it was more probable for those who were PARP inhibitor naïve to have no response to their most recent line of therapy.

In the PARP inhibitor naïve population, the median PFS was 5.39 months (95% CI, 3.32-5.85) vs 4.27 months (95% CI, 2.83-5.52) with mirvetuximab soravtansine and chemotherapy, respectively (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.54-1.03; P = .0685). The median PFS among patients previously treated with a PARP inhibitor was 5.85 months (95% CI, 4.57-7.06) vs 3.91 months (95% CI, 2.60-4.37) in each respective treatment arm (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.43-0.78; P = .0002).

The median PFS among patients who received 1 to 2 prior lines of treatment was 5.68 months (95% CI, 4.96-6.97) with mirvetuximab soravtansine vs 4.04 months (95% CI, 2.83-5.29) with chemotherapy (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.45-0.81; P = .0007). Additionally, investigators reported a median PFS of 4.37 months (95% CI, 3.32-5.85) vs 3.98 months (95% CI, 2.66-4.34) in each respective arm among patients who received 3 prior lines of treatment (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.52-0.98; P = .0362).

Treatment with mirvetuximab soravtansine elicited an ORR of 42% (95% CI, 36%-49%) compared with 16% (95% CI, 11%-21%) among patients who received chemotherapy in the overall population (odds ratio [OR], 3.81; 95% CI, 2.44-5.94; P <.0001).

The ORR in the PARP inhibitor–naïve population was 40% (95% CI, 30%-51%) with the experimental treatment vs 14% (95% CI, 8%-23%) with chemotherapy (OR, 4.19; 95% CI, 2.06-8.54; P <.0001). Among patients previously treated with a PARP inhibitor, the ORR was 45% (95% CI, 36%-54%) vs 17% (95% CI, 11%-25%) in each respective arm (OR, 3.93; 95% CI, 2.20-7.02; P <.0001).

Among patients who received 1 or 2 prior lines of treatment, the ORR was 46% (95% CI, 37%-55%) with mirvetuximab soravtansine vs 15% (95% CI, 9%-22%) with chemotherapy (OR, 4.95; 95% CI, 2.68-9.14; P <.0001). Additionally, the ORR with each respective treatment was 38% (95% CI, 29%-48%) vs 18% (95% CI, 11%-26%) among those previously treated with 3 lines of therapy (OR, 2.91; 95% CI, 1.53-5.53; P = .0009).

Any-grade treatment-emergent adverse effects (TEAEs) affected 96% of patients who received mirvetuximab soravtansine compared with 94% of those who received chemotherapy. Additionally, 9% and 16% of patients in each respective arm discontinued study therapy following TEAEs. According to Moore, mirvetuximab soravtansine demonstrated a favorable safety profile compared with chemotherapy, and that most toxicities associated with the experimental agent consisted of low-grade ocular, neurosensory, and gastrointestinal events.

Reference

Van Gorp T, Sabatier R, Konecny GE, et al. Efficacy of mirvetuximab soravtansine in folate receptor alpha high, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer by type and number of prior treatment regimens: an exploratory analysis. Presented at the 2023 Annual Global Meeting of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society (IGCS); November 5-7, 2023; Seoul, South Korea.

Related Videos
Cretostimogene grenadenorepvec’s efficacy compares favorably with the current nonsurgical standards of care in high-risk, Bacillus Calmette Guerin–unresponsive non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.
Artificial intelligence models may be “seamlessly incorporated” into clinical workflow in the management of prostate cancer, says Eric Li, MD.
Robust genetic testing guidelines in the prostate cancer space must be supported by strong clinical research before they can be properly implemented, says William J. Catalona, MD.
Treatment with tisotumab vedotin may be a standard of care in second- or third-line recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer, says Brian Slomovitz, MD, MS, FACOG.
Future analyses will look at durvalumab/olaparib for endometrial cancer populations with TP53 and POLE alterations, as well as those with estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor positivity.
Patients with mismatch repair proficient, newly diagnosed, advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer may have enhanced benefit with the addition of olaparib to durvalumab.
Common adverse effects following treatment with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in the phase 3 CLEAR study include diarrhea, hypertension, and fatigue, according to Thomas E. Hutson, DO, PharmD, FACP.
Interim data reveal favorable responses in patients with low-grade serous ovarian cancer treated with avutometinib plus defactinib, according to Susana N. Banerjee, MD.
Related Content