Moderate-Dose External Radiation Plus Implants Increase Survival in Cervical Cancer

Publication
Article
OncologyONCOLOGY Vol 13 No 7
Volume 13
Issue 7

Standard radiation therapy for patients with latestage cervical cancer (stage IIIB) should be adjusted so that each patient receives moderate doses of external-beam radiation therapy plus radioactive implants, according to a study led by Dr. Mark

Standard radiation therapy for patients with latestage cervical cancer (stage IIIB) should be adjusted so that each patient receives moderate doses of external-beam radiation therapy plus radioactive implants, according to a study led by Dr. Mark D. Logsdon, now at the Radiological Association of Sacramento, California. For the large, single-institution study, Dr. Logsdon and his team of investigators reviewed the records of more than 1,000 patients treated between 1960 and 1993 at M. D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas.

“The study found that patients who received both types of radiation treatment had a survival rate nearly double that of patients who were treated with high doses of external-beam radiation therapy alone,” said Dr. Logsdon, md. In addition, the study showed that higher doses of external-beam radiation treatment are not really better. Patients treated with moderate doses of external-beam radiation therapy (34 to 47 Gy) plus radioactive implants had a survival rate of 53% at 5 years, compared to a rate of about 30% for patients treated with higher doses of external-beam radiation therapy and lower implant doses.

Moderate Doses Lessen Complications

The risk of complications was also much lower with moderate doses of external-beam radiation. The incidence of severe complications almost tripled as the external-beam dose increased, said Dr. Logsdon.

“Conventional thinking has been that increased doses of external-beam therapy were necessary to cure such advanced disease. In fact, patients derived a double benefit—increased cure rates and better long-term quality of life—when more moderate doses of external treatment were combined with higher implant doses,” he said.

The study results, say the investigators, provide convincing evidence that optimal radiation therapy for cervical cancer must include both moderate doses of external-beam treatment plus radioactive implants. (Recently announced studies indicate that the survival rate may be improved even further by adding chemotherapy.)

The study was published in the March 1999 issue of the International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology and Physics.

Related Videos
Brian Slomovitz, MD, MS, FACOG discusses the use of new antibody drug conjugates for treating patients with various gynecologic cancers.
Developing novel regimens may continue to improve survival outcomes of patients with advanced cervical cancer following the FDA approval of pembrolizumab and chemoradiation, says Jyoti S. Mayadev, MD.
Treatment with pembrolizumab plus chemoradiation appears to be well tolerated with no detriment to quality of life among those with advanced cervical cancer.
Jyoti S. Mayadev, MD, says that pembrolizumab in combination with chemoradiation will be seamlessly incorporated into her institution’s treatment of those with FIGO 2014 stage III to IVA cervical cancer following the regimen’s FDA approval.
Despite the addition of a TIGIT inhibitor to a checkpoint inhibitor resulting in high levels of safety, there is no future for that combination alone, according to Ritu Salani, MD.
Treatment with tisotumab vedotin may be a standard of care in second- or third-line recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer, says Brian Slomovitz, MD, MS, FACOG.
Domenica Lorusso, MD, PhD, says that paying attention to the quality of chemoradiotherapy is imperative to feeling confident about the potential addition of pembrolizumab for locally advanced cervical cancer.
Guidelines from the Society of Gynecologic Oncology may help with managing the ongoing chemotherapy shortage in the treatment of patients with gynecologic cancers, according to Brian Slomovitz, MD, MS, FACOG.
Related Content