Novel AI Tool Helps Patients to Find, Understand Clinical Trials

Article helped to match patients with gastrointestinal cancers to clinical trials using 7 different criteria, possibly paving the way for patients to find, understand, and enroll in oncology clinical trials.

According to an ongoing study presented at the 2020 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Gastrointestinal Cancer Symposium, a novel artificial intelligence (AI)-based search tool is now making it easier for patients to find and understand oncology clinical trials, while simultaneously offering more clarity on how patients can enroll in them. helped to match patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancers to clinical trials using 7 different criteria, including trial sponsor, trial phase, tumor type, cancer stage, across solid tumors, by genetic mutations, and by previous treatment.

“Patients have limited access to an understanding of clinical trials and the online search tools that we have available – not only for patients, but even for providers – can be very hard to navigate,” study author Pashtoon Kasi, MD, MS, clinical assistant professor of internal medicine, hematology, oncology and blood and marrow transplantation at the University of Iowa Health Care, said during a virtual presentation at the symposium.

Improving understanding and access to clinical trials may result in more representative trial enrollment. Lack of diversity in clinical trials has been an issue that many researchers are facing, and can result in, “sometimes devastating medical consequences,” the researchers wrote.

After utilizing, participants were asked to complete a 20-minute survey evaluating both – which is commonly used for searching for trials – and the novel tool Patients used a 5-point Likert scale to rate aspects of usability for each platform.

“We took GI clinical trials as an example of how this would be applicable to several other tumor types,” Kasi said. “The trial information is restructured based on key eligibility differentiators, [and] is patient-focused in terms of providing questionnaires that have been based on eligibility differentiators, which could be further personalized, and a value for institutions as well as patient advocacy groups.”

At baseline, the average rating for participants’ understanding of clinical trials was 3.1 (±1.2). Patient associations and the internet were their main sources of information about trials. Finding clinical trials was easier for patients using, compared to not using the tool (3.7±0.9 vs. 2.7±1.3, respectively).

Additionally, the researchers said that the tool improved patients’ understanding of information presented (3.8±1.1 vs. 2.6±1.3); and directionally provided more clarity on how to enroll in trials (4.2±0.8 vs. 3.7±1.4). Ultimately, these factors led to improved patient satisfaction (3.4±1.1 vs. 2.3±0.5). also could lead to better connection among principal investigators, patients and caregivers, and advocacy groups.

“In summary, with this tool, personalizing and simplifying client information can lead to better patient comprehension, as well as ease of access and navigation, leading to better patient satisfaction and an increased trial pool,” Kasi said. “This could mean broader and more diverse patient pool.”


Kasi PM, Jordan E, Jahreiss L. Deploying an AI-based online search tool to increase patients’ access to and understanding of solid tumor GI clinical trials. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39 (suppl 3). Abstract #: 456.

Related Videos
Considering cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer may help with managing the shortage of Bacillus Calmette-Guerin, according to Joshua J. Meeks, MD, PhD, BS.
Anemia in patients who receive talazoparib plus enzalutamide for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer appears to be manageable without any compromises in patient-reported outcomes and quality of life.
Patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer and visceral disease may particularly benefit from enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab, according to Amanda Nizam, MD.
High-grade adverse effects with zanidatamab plus palbociclib and fulvestrant seem to be uncommon in patients with HER2-positive, hormone receptor–positive, metastatic breast cancer, according to Sara Hurvitz, MD, FACP.
Black male patients with breast cancer appear to experience worse survival outcomes compared with White patients when controlling for clinicopathological variables, according to Jason (Jincong) Q. Freeman, MPH, MS.
Results from the ECOG-ACRIN E4112 trial appear to support the use of DCIS scores for identifying patients with breast cancer who may be eligible to omit radiotherapy following MRI-guided surgery.
Providers should inform patients with breast cancer that selecting later-line therapies following prior treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors is a “developing area,” says Abigail M. Johnston, JD.
Data from the phase 3 NATALEE trial highlight a positive toxicity profile for ribociclib as an adjuvant therapy for patients with hormone receptor–positive, HER2-negative breast cancer, says Neil M. Iyengar, MD.
Future research will focus on ctDNA dynamics change over time in the full translational cohort of patients with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer in the phase 3 monarchE study, says Stephanie L. Graff, MD.
Findings from a National Cancer Database analysis highlight no statistically significant differences in survival outcomes with chemotherapy for patients over 81 years old with triple-negative breast cancer compared with those who do not receive chemotherapy.
Related Content