Omission of 5-FU From Combo Therapy May Improve Results in Advanced GI Cancers

News
Article

The use of 5-fluorouracil decreased toxicity and possible savings in first-line advanced gastrointestinal cancers.

The use of 5-fluorouracil decreased toxicity and possible savings in first-line advanced gastrointestinal cancers.

The use of 5-fluorouracil decreased toxicity and possible savings in first-line advanced gastrointestinal cancers.

Recent data from a large multicenter cohort study of 11,745 patients suggest that the omission of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) from first-line multidrug regimens may lead to reduced treatment toxicity without compromising efficacy in patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancers, according to a study published in the Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network.

Of note, there was no difference detected in overall survival (OS) when the 5-FU bolus component was omitted from regimens (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.91–1.07; P = .74), according to the inverse probability treatment weighting analysis (IPTW). Among subgroups categorized by age, sex, EGOC performance status, cancer type, medication regimen, and practice setting, there was no significant difference in OS.

The analysis was further stratified by year of treatment, and data from the study did not show a difference in OS (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.91–1.06; P = .62). Investigators saw no difference in OS based on regimen used—FOLFOX ((leucovorin, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin) vs FOLFIRI (leucovorin, fluorouracil, and irinotecan) vs FOLFIRINOX (leucovorin, fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.90–1.05; P = .51)—or cancer type (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.91–1.06; P = .62). Adjusted doses for oxaliplatin and irinotecan also yielded no difference (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.86–1.11; P = .78), along with the use of adjunctive monoclonal antibodies and immunotherapies (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.93–1.09; P = .83).

“Historically, the benefit of including the 5-FU bolus component has not been studied as a primary end point in clinical trials, but several studies suggest that the bolus may not be needed,” Chengwei Peng, MD, a medical oncologist from Northwestern Medicine, and colleagues wrote in the article. “The phase 3 OPTIMOX1 trial in colorectal cancer comparing FOLFOX4 (using both bolus and infusional 5-FU) vs FOLFOX7 (infusional 5-FU only) suggests that there is no additional benefit to bolus 5-FU, although this was not the primary endpoint. Retrospective studies in pancreatic cancer comparing FOLFIRINOX vs modified FOLFIRINOX (which does not contain 5-FU bolus) have also not demonstrated survival differences. In our study, we observed no differences in survival, regardless of the specific 5-FU MDR used or the cancer subtype.”

The median patient age in the study was 63 years old, 59.6% were male, 64.2% were White, and 90.3% had an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1. The most common cancer subtype was colorectal cancer (73.7%), followed by pancreatic cancer (13.7%), and gastroesophageal cancer (12.6%).

Of the patients who received 5-FU, 68.1% received FOLFOX, 18.2% received FOLFIRI, and 13.7% received FOLFIRINOX. Most patients—86.3%—received the standard-dose 5-FU bolus on the initial day of treatment. The bolus was administered to 61.6% of patients who received FOLFIRINOX, 89.2% of patients who received FOLFIRI, and 90.4% of patients who received FOLFOX. Patients who received the 5-FU bolus tended to be younger and healthier, accompanied by lower EGOC performance status scores and Charlson comorbidity scores. These patients also tended to receive higher starting doses of oxaliplatin and irinotecan.

Before the PTW analysis, the median OS was 14.0 months (95% CI, 6.5-31.8) in those who did not receive a 5-FU bolus and 20.3 months (95% CI, 9.2-42.2) for those who did (P < .01). The median OS after the IPTW analysis found the median OS was 18.6 months (95% CI, 8.5-40.5) vs 19.4 (95% CI, 8.4-40.7) in each group, respectively.

In terms of the safety profile, it was shown in the unadjusted analysis that patients who received 5-FU bolus were more likely to experience neutropenia within 14 days of treatment (22.3% vs 14.6%; P < .01), including more grade 3/4 neutropenia (8.2% vs 6.0%; P < .01). Following IPTW analysis, patients who received the 5-FU bolus became more likely to experience thrombocytopenia within 14 days after treatment (16.1% vs 11.2%; P < .01). It was also found that patients who received the 5-FU bolus required granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) at significantly higher rates within 30 days following treatment.

Reference

Peng C, Saffo S, Oberstein PE, et al. Omission of 5-fluorouracil bolus from multidrug regimens for advanced gastrointestinal cancers: a multicenter cohort study. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2024;22(00):1–7. doi:10.6004/jnccn.2024.7029

Newsletter

Stay up to date on recent advances in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer.

Recent Videos
Those being treated for peritoneal carcinomatosis may not have to experience the complication rates or prolonged recovery associated with surgical options.
For patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, integrating PIPAC into a treatment regimen does not interrupt their systemic therapy.
According to Benjamin J. Golas, MD, PIPAC could be used as a bridging therapy before surgical debulking or between subsequent large surgical operations.
According to Benjamin Golas, MD, PIPAC is emerging as minimally invasive laparoscopic approach for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis.
According to Ronan J. Kelly, deciding whether to give nivolumab- or durvalumab-based regimens in gastric cancers may rely on a patient’s frailty.
Five-year follow-up revealed that patients treated with nivolumab vs placebo in the phase 3 CheckMate 577 trial experienced a “doubling” of survival.
Patients treated with nivolumab in the phase 3 CheckMate 577 trial were less likely to experience progression-related treatment discontinuation vs placebo.
Testing a patient’s genetics may influence decisions such as using longer courses of radiotherapy, says Rachit Kumar, MD.
Spatial transcriptomics and multiplex immunohistochemistry from samples may elucidate outcomes for patients who undergo surgical care for cancer.