(P115) The Experience of a Radiation Oncology Center in Gauging the Use of Single-Fraction Radiotherapy for Painful Bone Metastases

OncologyOncology Vol 29 No 4_Suppl_1
Volume 29
Issue 4_Suppl_1

We observed an increase in the use of SFRT for bone metastases over the time period covered. Tracking the encounters by ICD codes and CPT codes, when properly coded, served as a useful tool in providing a snapshot view of SFRT usage. Additionally, physician education is a prerequisite for the proper use of a CPT 77431 to capture the true rate of usage of SFRT in clinical practice.

George A. Dawson, MD, Ignat Glushko, MBA, Alice V. Cheuk, MD; Veterans Health Administration

BACKGROUND: There is mounting category 1 evidence of the effectiveness of single-fraction radiotherapy (SFRT) in the treatment of uncomplicated, painful bone metastases [Jones, CA Cancer J Clin 2014]. Surveys indicate that physicians in the United States still prefer multiple fractions of RT for uncomplicated bone metastases compared with their Canadian or European colleagues [Popovic et al, Radiother Oncol 2014].

In this report, we used current procedure terminology (CPT) code tracking to determine the scope of use of SFRT for painful malignant bone lesions compared with multiple-fraction RT (MFRT).

METHOD: We searched for encounters with an International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code 198.5-Secondary malignancy of bone and/or bone marrow either in primary or secondary positions-and current procedural terminology (CPT) code 77431-Physician weekly visit for 1–2 treatments. Data points below represent 77431 usage only.

From 2002 to 2008, usage was as follows: 2002 (0), 2003 (0), 2004 (5), 2005 (1), 2006 (7), 2007 (4), and 2008 (0). From 2009 to October 13, 2014, usage was as follows: 2009 (0), 2010 (0), 2011 (4), 2012 (12), 2013 (10), and 2014 (8). These periods were chosen to reflect a surge in interest in SFRT usage at the end of life, such as the Choosing Wisely Campaign of the American Society of Radiation Oncology in 2013.

Data limitations/assumptions: Not all providers code appropriately for both procedures and diagnosis.

RESULTS: We noted a 133% increase in the use of SFRT for painful bone lesions at our center from 2002–2008 to 2009–October 13, 2014. On average, CPT code 77431 was used 2.43 times a year for patients with ICD code 198.5 of bone metastases from 2002–2008, and 5.67 times (8.50 times, excluding 2009 and 2010) from 2009–October 13, 2014. Of note, in 2002, 2003, 2008, 2009, and 2010, CPT code 77431 was not used at all.

CONCLUSION: We observed an increase in the use of SFRT for bone metastases over the time period covered. Tracking the encounters by ICD codes and CPT codes, when properly coded, served as a useful tool in providing a snapshot view of SFRT usage. Additionally, physician education is a prerequisite for the proper use of a CPT 77431 to capture the true rate of usage of SFRT in clinical practice.

Proceedings of the 97th Annual Meeting of the American Radium Society - americanradiumsociety.org

Articles in this issue

(P005) Ultrasensitive PSA Identifies Patients With Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer Requiring Postop Radiotherapy
(P001) Disparities in the Local Management of Breast Cancer in the United States According to Health Insurance Status
(P002) Predictors of CNS Disease in Metastatic Melanoma: Desmoplastic Subtype Associated With Higher Risk
(P003) Identification of Somatic Mutations Using Fine Needle Aspiration: Correlation With Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
(P004) A Retrospective Study to Assess Disparities in the Utilization of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and Proton Therapy (PT) in the Treatment of Prostate Cancer (PCa)
(S001) Tumor Control and Toxicity Outcomes for Head and Neck Cancer Patients Re-Treated With Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT)-A Fifteen-Year Experience
(S003) Weekly IGRT Volumetric Response Analysis as a Predictive Tool for Locoregional Control in Head and Neck Cancer Radiotherapy 
(S004) Combination of Radiotherapy and Cetuximab for Aggressive, High-Risk Cutaneous Squamous Cell Cancer of the Head and Neck: A Propensity Score Analysis
(S005) Radiotherapy for Carcinoma of the Hypopharynx Over Five Decades: Experience at a Single Institution
(S002) Prognostic Value of Intraradiation Treatment FDG-PET Parameters in Locally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
(P006) The Role of Sequential Imaging in Cervical Cancer Management
(P008) Pretreatment FDG Uptake of Nontarget Lung Tissue Correlates With Symptomatic Pneumonitis Following Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR)
(P009) Monte Carlo Dosimetry Evaluation of Lung Stereotactic Body Radiosurgery
(P010) Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Treatment of Adrenal Gland Metastasis: Toxicity, Outcomes, and Patterns of Failure
(P011) Stereotactic Radiosurgery and BRAF Inhibitor Therapy for Melanoma Brain Metastases Is Associated With Increased Risk for Radiation Necrosis
Related Videos
The risk of radionuclide exposure to the public reflects one reason urologists need to collaborate with radiation oncologists when administering radiopharmaceuticals to patients with prostate cancer.
Switching out beta emitters for alpha emitters, including radium-223, is one way to improve radiopharmaceutical treatment of prostate cancer, according to an expert from Weill Cornell Medicine.
Data demonstrate the feasibility of automated glomerular filtration rate prediction to decide between partial nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy in kidney cancer, according to an expert from the Cleveland Clinic.
Early phase trials investigating cellular therapies, bispecific antibodies, and antibody-drug conjugates for refractory kidney cancer may uncover strategies to overcome resistance mechanisms.
Increasing cancer antigen presentation as well as working with tumor cells in and delivering novel cells to the microenvironment may help in overcoming mechanisms of immune checkpoint inhibitor resistance in refractory renal cell carcinoma.
Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab appears to be the best option for patients with refractory metastatic renal cell carcinoma who are progressing on immunotherapy combinations or are lenvatinib naïve.
Ipilimumab monotherapy does not appear effective in driving complete responses in refractory renal cell carcinoma despite yielding some progression-free survival intervals, according to an expert from the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center.
An expert from the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center discusses several phase 3 clinical trials supporting the use of various single-agent and combination immunotherapy regimens for advanced kidney cancer.
Shilpa Gupta, MD, shares the current standard of care for muscle-invasive bladder cancer and highlights other options that may be suitable for some patients.
An expert from Stanford Medicine that the goal behind a study characterizing circulating tumor DNA and its predictive value is to eventually replace blood marrow exams with a blood draw for those with multiple myeloma.
Related Content